IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/woraff/v187y2024i4p387-403.html

China and Russia as service providers for illiberal governance

Author

Listed:
  • Erica Marat
  • Marlene Laruelle
  • Gagan Atreya

Abstract

Illiberal governance is on the rise across the globe. At the same time, China and Russia are expanding their investment and political presence in many countries. Most studies link these two trends—the rise of domestic illiberalism and China's and Russia's growing geopolitical influence—often assuming that both Beijing and Moscow are responsible for the spread of autocratic values across the globe. Instead, we find that China and Russia are leveraging existing illiberal trends to expand their global reach. In this article, we analyze media coverage between 2015 and 2022 in Hungary, Türkiye, and Kyrgyzstan of these countries' respective bilateral relations with China and Russia, and we show that countries pursue their own interests by collaborating with China and Russia, often framing external engagement as a positive political and economic development. Our analysis shows that China's foreign messaging is consolidated around a set of ideals, while Russian engagement is mostly driven by anti‐Western sentiments. 非自由治理在全球范围内呈上升趋势。与此同时,中国和俄罗斯正在许多国家扩大投资和政治影响。大多数研究将这两种趋势联系起来——即国内反自由主义的兴起、以及中国和俄罗斯日益增长的地缘政治影响力——通常假设北京和莫斯科方面都对独裁价值观在全球的传播负有责任。相反,我们发现,中国和俄罗斯正在利用现有的非自由趋势来扩大其全球影响力。本文中,我们分析了2015年至2022年匈牙利、土耳其和吉尔吉斯斯坦的媒体对这些国家各自与中国和俄罗斯的双边关系的报道。我们表明,各国通过与中国和俄罗斯的合作来追求自身利益,通常将对外接触建构为积极的政治发展和经济发展。我们的分析表明,中国的对外信息是围绕一系列理想进行巩固的,而俄罗斯的参与主要是由反西方情绪驱动的。 La gobernanza iliberal está aumentando en todo el mundo. Al mismo tiempo, China y Rusia están ampliando sus inversiones y su presencia política en muchos países. La mayoría de los estudios vinculan estas dos tendencias (el auge del iliberalismo interno y la creciente influencia geopolítica de China y Rusia), asumiendo a menudo que tanto Beijing como Moscú son responsables de la difusión de valores autocráticos en todo el mundo. En cambio, encontramos que China y Rusia están aprovechando las tendencias antiliberales existentes para expandir su alcance global. En este artículo analizamos la cobertura mediática entre 2015 y 2022 en Hungría, Türkiye y Kirguistán de las respectivas relaciones bilaterales de estos países con China y Rusia, y mostramos que los países persiguen sus propios intereses colaborando con China y Rusia, a menudo enmarcando el compromiso externo. como un desarrollo político y económico positivo. Nuestro análisis muestra que los mensajes exteriores de China se consolidan en torno a un conjunto de ideales, mientras que el compromiso ruso está impulsado principalmente por sentimientos antioccidentales.

Suggested Citation

  • Erica Marat & Marlene Laruelle & Gagan Atreya, 2024. "China and Russia as service providers for illiberal governance," World Affairs, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 187(4), pages 387-403, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:woraff:v:187:y:2024:i:4:p:387-403
    DOI: 10.1002/waf2.12044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/waf2.12044
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/waf2.12044?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bei Qin & David Strömberg & Yanhui Wu, 2017. "Why Does China Allow Freer Social Media? Protests versus Surveillance and Propaganda," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 31(1), pages 117-140, Winter.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leopoldo Fergusson & Carlos Molina, 2020. "Facebook Causes Protests," HiCN Working Papers 323, Households in Conflict Network.
    2. Lai, Weizheng, 2024. "The effect of education on voter turnout in China's rural elections," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 230-247.
    3. Joël Cariolle & Yasmine Elkhateeb & Mathilde Maurel, 2022. "(Mis-)information technology: Internet use and perception of democracy in Africa," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 22010, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    4. Xiaoyue Yan & Mike S. Schäfer, 2025. "Multimodal climate change communication on WeChat: analyzing visual/textual clusters on China’s largest social media platform," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 178(7), pages 1-22, July.
    5. Tähtinen, Tuuli, 2024. "When Facebook Is the Internet: The Role of Social Media in Ethnic Conflict," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    6. Erin Baggott Carter & Brett L. Carter, 2021. "Propaganda and Protest in Autocracies," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 65(5), pages 919-949, May.
    7. Yu, Wei & Pan, Jianping & Fan, Rui & Yu, Manjiao, 2025. "Government provided credit ratings and foreign sales: Evidence from China," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    8. Chen Li & Shenjing He, 2023. "‘Carrot and stick’ approach to housing demolition and relocation under flexible authoritarianism in urban China," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, December.
    9. Anton Bogs, 2026. "Participation Disenchants: How Online Political Participation Decreases Online Political Efficacy in China," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(1), pages 35-63, January.
    10. Li, Yi & Zhang, Wei & Wang, Pengfei & Goodell, John W., 2024. "Social media as an amplifier of insider trading profits," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    11. von Essen, Emma & Jansson, Joakim, 2020. "Misogynistic and Xenophobic Hate Language Online: A Matter of Anonymity," Working Paper Series 1350, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    12. Danielle Caled & Mário J. Silva, 2022. "Digital media and misinformation: An outlook on multidisciplinary strategies against manipulation," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 123-159, May.
    13. Leo Yang Yang & Yiqing Xu, 2025. "User Location Disclosure Fails to Deter Overseas Criticism but Amplifies Regional Divisions on Chinese Social Media," Papers 2507.03238, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2025.
    14. Kun Tracy Wang & Nathan Zhenghang Zhu & Guqiang Luo, 2024. "Does News Media Affect Firm Innovation in Emerging Markets? Evidence from China," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 60(4), pages 709-751, December.
    15. Monica Martinez-Bravo & Gerard Padró I Miquel & Nancy Qian & Yang Yao, 2017. "The Rise and Fall of Local Elections in China: Theory and Empirical Evidence on the Autocrat's Trade-off," NBER Working Papers 24032, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Kun He & Scott A. Eldridge II & Marcel Broersma, 2024. "Tactics of Disconnection: How Netizens Navigate China’s Censorship System," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 12.
    17. Jiménez Durán, Rafael & Müller, Karsten & Schwarz, Carlo, 2022. "The Effect of Content Moderation on Online and Offline Hate: Evidence from Germany's NetzDG," CEPR Discussion Papers 17554, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    18. Modreanu Andra & Toma Sorin-George & Gradinaru Catalin, 2023. "A Different Approach Towards Social Media: Chinese Young Consumers Behaviour Insights," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 6, pages 227-233, December.
    19. Shuhuan Zhou & Xiaokun Yang & Zhian Zhang, 2025. "Effects of COVID-19 Fact-Checking on Youths’ Rectifying Behaviors in Chinese Social Media: The Third-Person Effect," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(4), pages 21582440251, October.
    20. Myunghee Kim & Xiongwei Cao, 2021. "Linking global leadership to domestic legitimacy: Comparative analysis of perceptions of Xi and Obama," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(4), pages 1638-1653, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:woraff:v:187:y:2024:i:4:p:387-403. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.