IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/syseng/v16y2013i1p29-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A framework for benchmarking competency assessment models

Author

Listed:
  • Joseph Kasser
  • Derek Hitchins
  • Moti Frank
  • Yang Yang Zhao

Abstract

This paper discusses the need for competent systems engineers, the differences between nine current ways of assessing competencies (competency models) and the difficulty of comparing the competency models due to the different ways each model groups the competencies. The paper then introduces a competency model maturity framework (CMMF) for benchmarking competency models of systems engineers. The paper benchmarks the nine models using the CMMF and a surprising finding was an error of omission in all nine models. The paper shows that the CMMF can also be used as the basis for developing an original model for a specific organization in a specific time and place and concludes with suggestions for future research. ©2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Syst Eng 15

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph Kasser & Derek Hitchins & Moti Frank & Yang Yang Zhao, 2013. "A framework for benchmarking competency assessment models," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(1), pages 29-44, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:16:y:2013:i:1:p:29-44
    DOI: 10.1002/sys.21217
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21217
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sys.21217?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moti Frank, 2006. "Knowledge, abilities, cognitive characteristics and behavioral competences of engineers with high capacity for engineering systems thinking (CEST)," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(2), pages 91-103, June.
    2. Barry Richmond, 1993. "Systems thinking: Critical thinking skills for the 1990s and beyond," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 9(2), pages 113-133, June.
    3. Michael Emes & Alan Smith & Douglas Cowper, 2005. "Confronting an identity crisis—How to “brand” systems engineering," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(2), pages 164-186.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Omid Ali Kharazmi & Amirali Kharazmi, 2022. "A pathological analysis of challenges related to systems thinking studies in Iran," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(2), pages 241-257, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bucaro, Anthony C., 2019. "Enhancing auditors' critical thinking in audits of complex estimates," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 35-49.
    2. Kelley E. Dugan & Erika A. Mosyjowski & Shanna R. Daly & Lisa R. Lattuca, 2022. "Systems thinking assessments in engineering: A systematic literature review," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 840-866, July.
    3. Gürsan, C. & de Gooyert, V., 2021. "The systemic impact of a transition fuel: Does natural gas help or hinder the energy transition?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    4. K. Lawler & T. Vlasova & A. Moscardini, 2019. "Using System Dynamics in Macroeconomics," Вестник Киевского национального университета имени Тараса Шевченко. Экономика., Socionet;Киевский национальный университет имени Тараса Шевченко, vol. 3(204), pages 34-40.
    5. Heidi L. Davidz & Deborah J. Nightingale, 2008. "Enabling systems thinking to accelerate the development of senior systems engineers," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, March.
    6. Crystle J. Kelly & James Rogers & Edward J. Gallaher, 2021. "Insights from system dynamics that support experimental research: an exemplar of the NMDA receptor," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 37(2-3), pages 197-211, April.
    7. Camilo Olaya, 2015. "Cows, agency, and the significance of operational thinking," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 31(4), pages 183-219, October.
    8. Paul H. Thibodeau & Cynthia McPherson Frantz & Mirella L. Stroink, 2016. "Situating a Measure of Systems Thinking in a Landscape of Psychological Constructs," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(6), pages 753-769, November.
    9. Gattie, David K. & Kellam, Nadia N. & Turk, H. Jeff, 2007. "Informing ecological engineering through ecological network analysis, ecological modelling, and concepts of systems and engineering ecology," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 208(1), pages 25-40.
    10. Sue McAvoy & Andrew Staib & Gregory Treston, 2021. "Can a system dynamics model of the emergency department show which levers reduce bottlenecks and delays to improve access to care?," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 61-79, January.
    11. Min Kim & Soojin You & Jinhyung Chon & Junga Lee, 2017. "Sustainable Land-Use Planning to Improve the Coastal Resilience of the Social-Ecological Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-21, June.
    12. Rodney J. Scott & Robert Y. Cavana & Donald Cameron, 2016. "Mechanisms for Understanding Mental Model Change in Group Model Building," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 100-118, January.
    13. Eric D. Smith & A. Terry Bahill, 2010. "Attribute substitution in systems engineering," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(2), pages 130-148, June.
    14. Stanislava Mildeová & Martin Dalihod, 2017. "Systems Approach to Scientific Investigation in Informatics [Systémový přístup k vědeckému zkoumání v informatice]," Acta Informatica Pragensia, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2017(1), pages 60-69.
    15. Adam C. Davis & Mirella L. Stroink, 2016. "The Relationship between Systems Thinking and the New Ecological Paradigm," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 575-586, July.
    16. Schlör, Holger & Märker, Carolin & Venghaus, Sandra, 2021. "Developing a nexus systems thinking test –A qualitative multi- and mixed methods analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    17. Khalid Saeed, 2014. "Jay Forrester's operational approach to economics," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 30(4), pages 233-261, October.
    18. Jagustović, Renata & Zougmoré, Robert B. & Kessler, Aad & Ritsema, Coen J. & Keesstra, Saskia & Reynolds, Martin, 2019. "Contribution of systems thinking and complex adaptive system attributes to sustainable food production: Example from a climate-smart village," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 65-75.
    19. Yun Eui Choi & Kihwan Song & Min Kim & Junga Lee, 2017. "Transformation Planning for Resilient Wildlife Habitats in Ecotourism Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-28, March.
    20. Guido A. Veldhuis & Dominique Blok & Maaike H.T. de Boer & Gino J. Kalkman & Roos M. Bakker & Rob P.M. van Waas, 2024. "From text to model: Leveraging natural language processing for system dynamics model development," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 40(3), July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:16:y:2013:i:1:p:29-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6858 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.