IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/sysdyn/v37y2021i2-3p197-211.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Insights from system dynamics that support experimental research: an exemplar of the NMDA receptor

Author

Listed:
  • Crystle J. Kelly
  • James Rogers
  • Edward J. Gallaher

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Crystle J. Kelly & James Rogers & Edward J. Gallaher, 2021. "Insights from system dynamics that support experimental research: an exemplar of the NMDA receptor," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 37(2-3), pages 197-211, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:sysdyn:v:37:y:2021:i:2-3:p:197-211
    DOI: 10.1002/sdr.1688
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1688
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sdr.1688?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James Rogers & Edward J. Gallaher & David Dingli, 2018. "Personalized ESA doses for anemia management in hemodialysis patients with end‐stage renal disease," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 34(1-2), pages 121-153, January.
    2. Barry Richmond, 1993. "Systems thinking: Critical thinking skills for the 1990s and beyond," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 9(2), pages 113-133, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khalid Saeed, 2014. "Jay Forrester's operational approach to economics," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 30(4), pages 233-261, October.
    2. Jagustović, Renata & Zougmoré, Robert B. & Kessler, Aad & Ritsema, Coen J. & Keesstra, Saskia & Reynolds, Martin, 2019. "Contribution of systems thinking and complex adaptive system attributes to sustainable food production: Example from a climate-smart village," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 65-75.
    3. Yun Eui Choi & Kihwan Song & Min Kim & Junga Lee, 2017. "Transformation Planning for Resilient Wildlife Habitats in Ecotourism Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-28, March.
    4. Gürsan, C. & de Gooyert, V., 2021. "The systemic impact of a transition fuel: Does natural gas help or hinder the energy transition?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    5. K. Lawler & T. Vlasova & A. Moscardini, 2019. "Using System Dynamics in Macroeconomics," Вестник Киевского национального университета имени Тараса Шевченко. Экономика., Socionet;Киевский национальный университет имени Тараса Шевченко, vol. 3(204), pages 34-40.
    6. Piero Mella & Michela Pellicelli, 2017. "How Myopia Archetypes Lead to Non-Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, December.
    7. Estee Vermeulen-Miltz & Jai Kumar Clifford-Holmes & Amanda Talita Lombard & Bernadette Snow, 2023. "Coastal Tourism Recovery amid COVID-19: Insights from a Participatory System Dynamics Approach," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-16, July.
    8. Bucaro, Anthony C., 2019. "Enhancing auditors' critical thinking in audits of complex estimates," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 35-49.
    9. Fernandes, Aline R. & da Silva, Carlos Arthur B., 2017. "Ten Years later: A Comparison of Results of Simulation Scenarios under a Systems Dynamic Approach and the Actual Economic Performance of Small-Scale Agro-industries Supported by Brazilian Agro-industr," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 8(2), March.
    10. Heidi L. Davidz & Deborah J. Nightingale, 2008. "Enabling systems thinking to accelerate the development of senior systems engineers," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, March.
    11. Zamra Sajid & Morten Andersen & Johnny T. Ottesen, 2020. "System dynamics of cancer in erythropoiesis with multiple EPO feedbacks," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 36(4), pages 447-466, October.
    12. Kwamina Ewur Banson & Daniel Kwasi Asare & Fidelis Doodaa Dery & Kwadwo Boakye & Akudugu Boniface & Moses Asamoah & Lourees Esi Awotwe, 2020. "Impact of Fall Armyworm on Farmer’s Maize: Systemic Approach," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 237-264, April.
    13. Orkun İrsoy & Şanser Güz & Naz Beril Akan & Gönenç Yücel, 2020. "Dynamic trade‐offs in granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor (G‐CSF) administration during chemotherapy," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 36(4), pages 397-446, October.
    14. Linlin Wang & Rongchang Wang & Haiyan Yan, 2021. "System-Dynamics Modeling for Exploring the Impact of Industrial-Structure Adjustment on the Water Quality of the River Network in the Yangtze Delta Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.
    15. Thomas Grisold & Markus F. Peschl, 2017. "Why a Systems Thinking Perspective on Cognition Matters for Innovation and Knowledge Creation. A Framework towards Leaving behind Our Projections from the Past for Creating New Futures," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 335-353, May.
    16. Martin F. G. Schaffernicht & Stefan N. Groesser, 2016. "A competence development framework for learning and teaching system dynamics," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 32(1), pages 52-81, January.
    17. Camilo Olaya, 2015. "Cows, agency, and the significance of operational thinking," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 31(4), pages 183-219, October.
    18. Paul H. Thibodeau & Cynthia McPherson Frantz & Mirella L. Stroink, 2016. "Situating a Measure of Systems Thinking in a Landscape of Psychological Constructs," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(6), pages 753-769, November.
    19. Gohari, Alireza & Savari, Peyman & Eslamian, Saeid & Etemadi, Nematollah & Keilmann-Gondhalekar, Daphne, 2022. "Developing a system dynamic plus framework for water-land-society nexus modeling within urban socio-hydrologic systems," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    20. Gattie, David K. & Kellam, Nadia N. & Turk, H. Jeff, 2007. "Informing ecological engineering through ecological network analysis, ecological modelling, and concepts of systems and engineering ecology," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 208(1), pages 25-40.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:sysdyn:v:37:y:2021:i:2-3:p:197-211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/0883-7066 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.