IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v33y2025is1p475-500.html

Systematic Literature Review and Meta‐Analysis of Landscape‐Scale Green Infrastructure Identification

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoqi Yang
  • Takeshi Kinoshita
  • Qian Wang
  • Yifan Chen

Abstract

As an early concept in Green Infrastructure (GI) research, landscape‐scale GI (LGI) has faced challenges due to its large spatial scale, limiting its application compared to smaller‐scale GI. However, its efficiency and multifunctionality in supporting Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are gaining attention. To address knowledge fragmentation and research gaps, this study integrates meta‐analysis with a systematic review to examine key factors influencing LGI identification methods and their impact on results. Following PRISMA guidelines, relevant literature was systematically screened, and extracted data were transformed into binary‐coded variables for quantitative analysis. The findings reveal multiple determinants affecting LGI identification, validated through meta‐analytic techniques. By introducing an innovative binary‐variable meta‐analysis in environmental science, this study develops a generalizable framework that systematically synthesizes literature and extracts new insights, ultimately enhancing LGI's capacity to support SDGs more effectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoqi Yang & Takeshi Kinoshita & Qian Wang & Yifan Chen, 2025. "Systematic Literature Review and Meta‐Analysis of Landscape‐Scale Green Infrastructure Identification," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(S1), pages 475-500, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:s1:p:475-500
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.70011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70011
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.70011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:s1:p:475-500. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.