IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v33y2025i2p2975-2995.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing environmental, social, and governance, performance and reporting through integration of life cycle sustainability assessment framework

Author

Listed:
  • Alejandro Padilla‐Rivera
  • Marwa Hannouf
  • Getachew Assefa
  • Ian Gates

Abstract

We introduce an innovative framework integrating Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA) impact categories with Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors, offering a unified approach for ESG assessment and reporting. It covers sustainable development's key aspects, enabling a detailed evaluation of environmental, economic, and social performance across product and system life cycles, in line with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Incorporating the UN's 10 principles, the framework fosters a synergy to improve ESG reporting, adaptable across industries. To demonstrate its practicality, a theoretical application in Canada's oil and gas sector highlights how this framework can provide actionable insights for SDG‐aligned performance improvements. This example illustrates how the framework can identify and address sustainability issues, thereby improving ESG performance. Beyond its theoretical contributions, the framework serves as a valuable tool for practitioners and investors, promoting informed and comprehensive ESG reporting. Ultimately, it aims to enhance organizations' contributions towards achieving the SDGs and advancing global sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Alejandro Padilla‐Rivera & Marwa Hannouf & Getachew Assefa & Ian Gates, 2025. "Enhancing environmental, social, and governance, performance and reporting through integration of life cycle sustainability assessment framework," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(2), pages 2975-2995, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:2:p:2975-2995
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.3265
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3265
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.3265?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Monica Billio & Michele Costola & Iva Hristova & Carmelo Latino & Loriana Pelizzon, 2021. "Inside the ESG ratings: (Dis)agreement and performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5), pages 1426-1445, September.
    2. Alessio Baratta & Antonio Cimino & Francesco Longo & Vittorio Solina & Saverino Verteramo, 2023. "The Impact of ESG Practices in Industry with a Focus on Carbon Emissions: Insights and Future Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, April.
    3. Marzia Traverso & Matthias Finkbeiner & Andreas Jørgensen & Laura Schneider, 2012. "Life Cycle Sustainability Dashboard," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 16(5), pages 680-688, October.
    4. ., 2024. "Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive," Chapters, in: EU Banking and Financial Regulation, chapter 72, pages 648-653, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Matthias Finkbeiner & Erwin M. Schau & Annekatrin Lehmann & Marzia Traverso, 2010. "Towards Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 2(10), pages 1-14, October.
    6. Rajna Gibson Brandon & Philipp Krueger & Peter Steffen Schmidt, 2021. "ESG Rating Disagreement and Stock Returns," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 77(4), pages 104-127, October.
    7. Yahong Dong & Md. Uzzal Hossain & Hongyang Li & Peng Liu, 2021. "Developing Conversion Factors of LCIA Methods for Comparison of LCA Results in the Construction Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-16, August.
    8. Xue, Min & Fu, Chao & Yang, Shan-Lin, 2020. "Group consensus reaching based on a combination of expert weight and expert reliability," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 369(C).
    9. Sakis Kotsantonis & George Serafeim, 2019. "Four Things No One Will Tell You About ESG Data," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 31(2), pages 50-58, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michele Rubino & Ilaria Mastrorocco & Giovanni Maria Garegnani, 2024. "The influence of market and institutional factors on ESG rating disagreement," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 3916-3926, September.
    2. Zhang, Cheng & Zha, Qianyao & Sun, Xun & Chen, Liping, 2024. "Does ESG rating disagreement affect audit opinions?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA).
    3. Wang, Xue & Liu, Qingyuan, 2024. "Information disclosure and ESG rating disagreement: Evidence from green bond issuance in China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    4. Horn, Matthias & Oehler, Andreas, 2024. "Constructing stock portfolios by sorting on ESG ratings: Does the rating provider matter?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA).
    5. Liu, Xiangqiang & Yang, Qingqing & Wei, Kai & Dai, Peng-Fei, 2024. "ESG rating disagreement and idiosyncratic return volatility: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(PB).
    6. Muck, Matthias & Schmidl, Thomas, 2024. "Comparing ESG score weighting approaches and stock performance differentiation," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 67(PB).
    7. Kurbus, Barbara & Rant, Vasja, 2025. "A legal origins perspective on ESG rating disagreement," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    8. Peter Kotzian, 2024. "Firms' sustainability engagement and sustainability‐related controversies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 1610-1625, March.
    9. Li Meiyi & Gan Yufei, 2025. "More Philanthropy, More Consistency? Examining the Impact of Corporate Charitable Donations on ESG Rating Uncertainty," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 19(1), pages 1-21.
    10. Konstantin Ignatov & Markus Rudolf, 2023. "Sentimental Sustainability: Does What Companies Say Tell More Than What Companies Do?," Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(4), pages 221-252, November.
    11. Horky, Florian & Pasquali, Andrea & Magazzino, Cosimo, 2024. "ESG rating disagreement portfolios – Evidence from the EuroStoxx 600," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 69(PA).
    12. Rekha Pillai & Md. Aminul Islam & S. Sreejith & Husam Aldin Al-Malkawi, 2025. "Comparative analysis of environmental, social and governance (ESG) ratings: do sectors and regions differ?," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 29(1), pages 69-109, March.
    13. Billio, Monica & Costola, Michele & Hristova, Iva & Latino, Carmelo & Pelizzon, Loriana, 2022. "Sustainable finance: A journey toward ESG and climate risk," SAFE Working Paper Series 349, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    14. Cheng, Louis T.W. & Cheong, Tsun Se & Wojewodzki, Michal & Chui, David, 2025. "The effect of ESG divergence on the financial performance of Hong Kong-listed firms: An artificial neural network approach," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(PA).
    15. Burger, Eric & Grba, Fabian & Heidorn, Thomas, 2022. "The impact of ESG ratings on implied and historical volatility," Frankfurt School - Working Paper Series 230, Frankfurt School of Finance and Management.
    16. Fredy Pokou & Jules Sadefo Kamdem & François Benhmad, 2024. "Empirical Performance of an ESG Assets Portfolio from US Market," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 64(3), pages 1569-1638, September.
    17. Bissoondoyal-Bheenick, Emawtee & Bennett, Scott & Lehnherr, Rob & Zhong, Angel, 2024. "ESG rating disagreement: Implications and aggregation approaches," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA).
    18. Torsten Ehlers & Ulrike Elsenhuber & Anandakumar Jegarasasingam & Eric Jondeau, 2022. "Deconstructing ESG scores: how to invest with your own criteria," BIS Working Papers 1008, Bank for International Settlements.
    19. Özge Sahin & Karoline Bax & Claudia Czado & Sandra Paterlini, 2022. "Environmental, Social, Governance scores and the Missing pillar—Why does missing information matter?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1782-1798, September.
    20. Tristan Jourde & Arthur Stalla-Bourdillon, 2024. "Environmental preferences and sector valuations," Post-Print halshs-04948464, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:2:p:2975-2995. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.