IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/soecon/v90y2024i3p612-633.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Bayesian analysis of e‐cigarette risk perceptions in the United Kingdom

Author

Listed:
  • W. Kip Viscusi

Abstract

Public Health England has communicated that e‐cigarettes provide at least a 95% risk reduction compared to conventional cigarettes. This article's survey evidence indicates that adults in the United Kingdom believe that e‐cigarettes are only 30%–40% safer overall and that they reduce lung cancer risks and total mortality risks by a similar percentage. A Bayesian analysis of risk beliefs finds that e‐cigarette risk perceptions are anchored on prior cigarette risk beliefs. The public, especially smokers, underestimates the magnitude of the risk reduction being communicated by public health officials. Those who are aware of e‐cigarette messages from Public Health England assess lower risks of e‐cigarettes, but they still underestimate the relative risk reduction. Even people with favorable qualitative beliefs about the harm reduction provided by e‐cigarettes overestimate the riskiness of e‐cigarettes.

Suggested Citation

  • W. Kip Viscusi, 2024. "A Bayesian analysis of e‐cigarette risk perceptions in the United Kingdom," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 90(3), pages 612-633, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:soecon:v:90:y:2024:i:3:p:612-633
    DOI: 10.1002/soej.12674
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/soej.12674
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/soej.12674?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:soecon:v:90:y:2024:i:3:p:612-633. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2325-8012 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.