IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v24y2004i6p1437-1451.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling the Demand Reduction Input‐Output (I‐O) Inoperability Due to Terrorism of Interconnected Infrastructures

Author

Listed:
  • Joost R. Santos
  • Yacov Y. Haimes

Abstract

Interdependency analysis in the context of this article is a process of assessing and managing risks inherent in a system of interconnected entities (e.g., infrastructures or industry sectors). Invoking the principles of input‐output (I‐O) and decomposition analysis, the article offers a framework for describing how terrorism‐induced perturbations can propagate due to interconnectedness. Data published by the Bureau of Economic Analysis Division of the U.S. Department of Commerce is utilized to present applications to serve as test beds for the proposed framework. Specifically, a case study estimating the economic impact of airline demand perturbations to national‐level U.S. sectors is made possible using I‐O matrices. A ranking of the affected sectors according to their vulnerability to perturbations originating from a primary sector (e.g., air transportation) can serve as important input to risk management. For example, limited resources can be prioritized for the “top‐n” sectors that are perceived to suffer the greatest economic losses due to terrorism. In addition, regional decomposition via location quotients enables the analysis of local‐level terrorism events. The Regional I‐O Multiplier System II (RIMS II) Division of the U.S. Department of Commerce is the agency responsible for releasing the regional multipliers for various geographical resolutions (economic areas, states, and counties). A regional‐level case study demonstrates a process of estimating the economic impact of transportation‐related scenarios on industry sectors within Economic Area 010 (the New York metropolitan region and vicinities).

Suggested Citation

  • Joost R. Santos & Yacov Y. Haimes, 2004. "Modeling the Demand Reduction Input‐Output (I‐O) Inoperability Due to Terrorism of Interconnected Infrastructures," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(6), pages 1437-1451, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:24:y:2004:i:6:p:1437-1451
    DOI: 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00540.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00540.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00540.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sharon M. Brucker & Steven E. Hastings & William R. Latham III, 1990. "The Variation of Estimated Impacts from Five Regional Input-Output Models," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 13(1-2), pages 119-139, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brockner, Joel & Higgins, E. Tory, 2001. "Regulatory Focus Theory: Implications for the Study of Emotions at Work," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 35-66, September.
    2. Earley, P. Christopher, 1999. "Playing Follow the Leader: Status-Determining Traits in Relation to Collective Efficacy across Cultures," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 80(3), pages 192-212, December.
    3. Klein, Howard J. & Wesson, Michael J. & Hollenbeck, John R. & Wright, Patrick M. & DeShon, Richard P., 2001. "The Assessment of Goal Commitment: A Measurement Model Meta-Analysis," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 85(1), pages 32-55, May.
    4. Robert Kirk, 1991. "Why Do Interstate Consumption Patterns Differ?," The Review of Regional Studies, Southern Regional Science Association, vol. 21(2), pages 171-183, Summer.
    5. Joost R. Santos, 2006. "Inoperability input‐output modeling of disruptions to interdependent economic systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(1), pages 20-34, March.
    6. Elena G. Irwin & Andrew M. Isserman & Maureen Kilkenny & Mark D. Partridge, 2010. "A Century of Research on Rural Development and Regional Issues," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 92(2), pages 522-553.
    7. Heath, Chip, 1999. "On the Social Psychology of Agency Relationships: Lay Theories of Motivation Overemphasize Extrinsic Incentives," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 78(1), pages 25-62, April.
    8. Jian Jin & Haoran Zhou, 2023. "A Demand-Side Inoperability Input–Output Model for Strategic Risk Management: Insight from the COVID-19 Outbreak in Shanghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-22, February.
    9. Gärling, Tommy & Eek, Daniel & Loukopoulos, Peter & Fujii, Satoshi & Johansson-Stenman, Olof & Kitamura, Ryuichi & Pendyala, Ram & Vilhelmson, Bertil, 2002. "A conceptual analysis of the impact of travel demand management on private car use," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 59-70, January.
    10. Linn Svegrup & Jonas Johansson & Henrik Hassel, 2019. "Integration of Critical Infrastructure and Societal Consequence Models: Impact on Swedish Power System Mitigation Decisions," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(9), pages 1970-1996, September.
    11. DeShon, Richard P. & Landis, Ronald S., 1997. "The Dimensionality of the Hollenbeck, Williams, and Klein (1989) Measure of Goal Commitment on Complex Tasks," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 70(2), pages 105-116, May.
    12. Frese, Michael & Hass, Lydia & Friedrich, Christian, 2016. "Personal initiative training for small business owners," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 27-36.
    13. Heath, Chip & Jourden, Forest J., 1997. "Illusion, Disillusion, and the Buffering Effect of Groups," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 103-116, February.
    14. Hinsz, Verlin B. & Kalnbach, Lynn R. & Lorentz, Nichole R., 1997. "Using Judgmental Anchors to Establish Challenging Self-Set Goals Without Jeopardizing Commitment," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 71(3), pages 287-308, September.
    15. Kray, Laura J. & Galinsky, Adam D. & Thompson, Leigh, 2002. "Reversing the Gender Gap in Negotiations: An Exploration of Stereotype Regeneration," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 386-410, March.
    16. Pilegge, Anthony J. & Holtz, Rolf, 1997. "The Effects of Social Identity on the Self-Set Goals and Task Performance of High and Low Self-Esteem Individuals," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 70(1), pages 17-26, April.
    17. Hinsz, Verlin B., 1999. "Group Decision Making with Responses of a Quantitative Nature: The Theory of Social Decision Schemes for Quantities, , , , , , , , , ," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 80(1), pages 28-49, October.
    18. Rokicki, Bartlomiej & Fritz, Oliver & Horridge, Mark & Hewings, Geoffrey, 2019. "Survey based versus non survey based Multi-Regional Input-Output Tables – the case of Austria," Conference papers 333115, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    19. Mulvey, Paul W. & Klein, Howard J., 1998. "The Impact of Perceived Loafing and Collective Efficacy on Group Goal Processes and Group Performance," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 74(1), pages 62-87, April.
    20. Rodney C. Jensen, 1990. "Construction and Use of Regional Input-Output Models: Progress and Prospects," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 13(1-2), pages 9-25, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:24:y:2004:i:6:p:1437-1451. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.