IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v46y1999i6p707-725.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The selection allocation problem

Author

Listed:
  • Renato de Matta
  • Vernon Ning Hsu
  • Timothy J. Lowe

Abstract

The Selection Allocation Problem (SAP) is a single period decision problem which involves selecting profit‐maximizing (or cost‐minimizing) activities from various distinct groups, and determining the volume of those activities. The activities in each group are selected subject to the availability of that group's resource, which is provided by either pooling or blending raw inputs from several potential sources. Imbedded in the decision process is the additional task of determining how much raw input is to be allocated to each group to form the resource for that group. Instances of this problem can be found in many different areas, such as in tool selection for flexible manufacturing systems, facility location, and funding for social services. Our goal in this paper is to identify and exploit special structures in the (SAP) and use those structures to develop an efficient solution procedure. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Naval Research Logistics 46: 707–725, 1999

Suggested Citation

  • Renato de Matta & Vernon Ning Hsu & Timothy J. Lowe, 1999. "The selection allocation problem," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 46(6), pages 707-725, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:46:y:1999:i:6:p:707-725
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6750(199909)46:63.0.CO;2-V
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6750(199909)46:63.0.CO;2-V
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6750(199909)46:63.0.CO;2-V?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hanan Luss & Shiv K. Gupta, 1975. "Technical Note—Allocation of Effort Resources among Competing Activities," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 360-366, April.
    2. Paul H. Zipkin, 1980. "Simple Ranking Methods for Allocation of One Resource," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 34-43, January.
    3. Kouvelis, Panagiotis, 1991. "An optimal tool selection procedure for the initial design phase of a flexible manufacturing system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 201-210, November.
    4. Satoru Fujishige & Naoki Katoh & Tetsuo Ichimori, 1988. "The Fair Resource Allocation Problem with Submodular Constraints," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(1), pages 164-173, February.
    5. Kurt M. Bretthauer & Bala Shetty, 1995. "The Nonlinear Resource Allocation Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(4), pages 670-683, August.
    6. Harvey J. Greenberg & William P. Pierskalla, 1970. "Surrogate Mathematical Programming," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 18(5), pages 924-939, October.
    7. Steven T. Hackman & Loren K. Platzman, 1990. "Near-Optimal Solution of Generalized Resource Allocation Problems with Large Capacities," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 38(5), pages 902-910, October.
    8. Rachelle S. Klein & Hanan Luss, 1991. "Minimax Resource Allocation with Tree Structured Substitutable Resources," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 39(2), pages 285-295, April.
    9. Awi Federgruen & Henri Groenevelt, 1986. "The Greedy Procedure for Resource Allocation Problems: Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Optimality," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(6), pages 909-918, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lee, Zu-Hsu & Deng, Shiming & Lin, Beixin & Yang, James G.S., 2010. "Decision model and analysis for investment interest expense deduction and allocation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 268-280, January.
    2. Patriksson, Michael, 2008. "A survey on the continuous nonlinear resource allocation problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(1), pages 1-46, February.
    3. Hanan Luss, 1999. "On Equitable Resource Allocation Problems: A Lexicographic Minimax Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 361-378, June.
    4. AgralI, Semra & Geunes, Joseph, 2009. "Solving knapsack problems with S-curve return functions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 193(2), pages 605-615, March.
    5. Dreyfuss, Michael & Giat, Yahel, 2017. "Optimal spares allocation to an exchangeable-item repair system with tolerable wait," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(2), pages 584-594.
    6. Steven J. Erlebacher & Medini R. Singh, 1999. "Optimal Variance Structures and Performance Improvement of Synchronous Assembly Lines," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(4), pages 601-618, August.
    7. DePaolo, Concetta A. & Rader, David Jr., 2007. "A heuristic algorithm for a chance constrained stochastic program," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(1), pages 27-45, January.
    8. Harwin De Vries & Lisa E. Swinkels & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2021. "Site Visit Frequency Policies for Mobile Family Planning Services," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(12), pages 4522-4540, December.
    9. Awi Federgruen & Nan Yang, 2008. "Selecting a Portfolio of Suppliers Under Demand and Supply Risks," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(4), pages 916-936, August.
    10. De Waegenaere, A.M.B. & Wielhouwer, J.L., 2001. "A Partial Ranking Algorithm for Resource Allocation Problems," Other publications TiSEM 8b2e0185-36f9-43df-8a3d-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    11. Patriksson, Michael & Strömberg, Christoffer, 2015. "Algorithms for the continuous nonlinear resource allocation problem—New implementations and numerical studies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(3), pages 703-722.
    12. Awi Federgruen & C. Daniel Guetta & Garud Iyengar, 2018. "Two‐echelon distribution systems with random demands and storage constraints," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 65(8), pages 594-618, December.
    13. Bretthauer, Kurt M. & Shetty, Bala, 2002. "The nonlinear knapsack problem - algorithms and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(3), pages 459-472, May.
    14. Dreyfuss, Michael & Giat, Yahel, 2019. "Allocating spares to maximize the window fill rate in a periodic review inventory system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 151-162.
    15. De Waegenaere, A.M.B. & Wielhouwer, J.L., 2001. "A Partial Ranking Algorithm for Resource Allocation Problems," Discussion Paper 2001-40, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    16. Kameshwaran, S. & Narahari, Y., 2009. "Nonconvex piecewise linear knapsack problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(1), pages 56-68, January.
    17. Kurt M. Bretthauer & Bala Shetty & Siddhartha Syam, 2003. "A specially structured nonlinear integer resource allocation problem," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 50(7), pages 770-792, October.
    18. Zhang, Bin & Hua, Zhongsheng, 2008. "A unified method for a class of convex separable nonlinear knapsack problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 191(1), pages 1-6, November.
    19. Alexandre Belloni & Giuseppe Lopomo & Shouqiang Wang, 2017. "Resource Allocation Under Demand Uncertainty and Private Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(12), pages 4219-4235, December.
    20. J-J Huang & G-H Tzeng & C-S Ong, 2006. "Choosing best alliance partners and allocating optimal alliance resources using the fuzzy multi-objective dummy programming model," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(10), pages 1216-1223, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:46:y:1999:i:6:p:707-725. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.