IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v40y1993i1p25-50.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Solving time/cost trade‐off problems with discounted cash flows using generalized benders decomposition

Author

Listed:
  • S. Selcuk Erenguc
  • Suleyman Tufekci
  • Christopher J. Zappe

Abstract

In this article we consider a project scheduling problem where there are cash flows throughout the life of the project and where shorter activity durations can be attained by incurring greater direct costs. In particular, the objective of this problem is to determine the activity durations and a schedule of activity start times so that the net present value of cash flows is maximized. We formulate this problem as a mixed‐integer nonlinear program which is amenable to solution using the generalized Benders decomposition technique developed by Geoffrion. We test the algorithm on 140 project scheduling problems, the largest of which contains 30 nodes and 64 activities. Our computational results are quite encouraging inasmuch as 123 of the 140 problems require less than 1 CPU second of solution time. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Suggested Citation

  • S. Selcuk Erenguc & Suleyman Tufekci & Christopher J. Zappe, 1993. "Solving time/cost trade‐off problems with discounted cash flows using generalized benders decomposition," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(1), pages 25-50, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:40:y:1993:i:1:p:25-50
    DOI: 10.1002/1520-6750(199302)40:13.0.CO;2-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6750(199302)40:13.0.CO;2-2
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/1520-6750(199302)40:13.0.CO;2-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard C. Grinold, 1972. "The payment scheduling problem," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(1), pages 123-136, March.
    2. Robert A. Russell, 1986. "A Comparison of Heuristics for Scheduling Projects with Cash Flows and Resource Restrictions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(10), pages 1291-1300, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wenhui Zhao & Nicholas G. Hall & Zhixin Liu, 2020. "Project Evaluation and Selection with Task Failures," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(2), pages 428-446, February.
    2. Nursel Kavlak & Gündüz Ulusoy & Funda Sivrikaya Şerifoğlu & Ş. İlker Birbil, 2009. "Client‐contractor bargaining on net present value in project scheduling with limited resources," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(2), pages 93-112, March.
    3. Thomas Schmitt & Bruce Faaland, 2004. "Scheduling recurrent construction," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 51(8), pages 1102-1128, December.
    4. M. Vanhoucke, 2006. "A scatter search procedure for maximizing the net present value of a project under renewable resource constraints," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 06/417, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    5. Salewski, Frank & Nissen, Rüdiger, 1993. "Revidierende hierarchische Planung: Ein Konzept am Beispiel der Personaleinsatzplanung in Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaften," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 335, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    6. Yuvraj Gajpal & Ashraf Elazouni, 2015. "Enhanced heuristic for finance-based scheduling of construction projects," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(7), pages 531-553, July.
    7. Schirmer, Andreas, 1995. "A guide to complexity theory in operations research," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 381, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    8. Tien-Fu Liang & Tien-Shou Huang & Ming-Feng Yang, 2012. "Application of fuzzy mathematical programming to imprecise project management decisions," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 46(5), pages 1451-1470, August.
    9. Hermans, Ben & Leus, Roel & Looy, Bart Van, 2023. "Deciding on scheduling, secrecy, and patenting during the new product development process: The relevance of project planning models," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    10. Williams, Terry, 1995. "A classified bibliography of recent research relating to project risk management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(1), pages 18-38, August.
    11. Scott E. Sampson & Elliott N. Weiss, 1993. "Local search techniques for the generalized resource constrained project scheduling problem," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(5), pages 665-675, August.
    12. Brucker, Peter & Drexl, Andreas & Mohring, Rolf & Neumann, Klaus & Pesch, Erwin, 1999. "Resource-constrained project scheduling: Notation, classification, models, and methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 3-41, January.
    13. Ashraf Elazouni, 2009. "Heuristic method for multi-project finance-based scheduling," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 199-211.
    14. Herroelen, Willy S. & Van Dommelen, Patrick & Demeulemeester, Erik L., 1997. "Project network models with discounted cash flows a guided tour through recent developments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 100(1), pages 97-121, July.
    15. Homberger, Jörg & Fink, Andreas, 2017. "Generic negotiation mechanisms with side payments – Design, analysis and application for decentralized resource-constrained multi-project scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(3), pages 1001-1012.
    16. Mika, Marek & Waligora, Grzegorz & Weglarz, Jan, 2005. "Simulated annealing and tabu search for multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling with positive discounted cash flows and different payment models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 164(3), pages 639-668, August.
    17. Salewski, Frank & Bartsch, Thomas & Pesch, Erwin, 1993. "Auftragsterminierung für die taktisch-operative Personaleinsatzplanung in Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaften," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 327, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    18. Joseph G. Szmerekovsky & George L. Vairaktarakis, 2006. "Maximizing project cash availability," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(4), pages 272-284, June.
    19. He, Zhengwen & Wang, Nengmin & Jia, Tao & Xu, Yu, 2009. "Simulated annealing and tabu search for multi-mode project payment scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(3), pages 688-696, November.
    20. Kolisch, R. & Padman, R., 2001. "An integrated survey of deterministic project scheduling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 249-272, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:40:y:1993:i:1:p:25-50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.