IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/natres/v29y2005i2p154-164.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is the WTO after your water? The General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) and poor people's right to water

Author

Listed:
  • Lyla Mehta
  • Birgit la Cour Madsen

Abstract

The General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) seeks to expand international trade in a wide range of services ranging from tourism to telecommunications and education. In recent years, it has come under attack from civil society organizations in both the North and the South for having a detrimental impact on poor people's right to basic services. This article explores some of these controversies, using the example of water services. It focuses specifically on the impact of the GATS on poor people's right to water and national governments’ ability to safeguard the interests of poor people through regulation. It demonstrates that, de jure, the liberalization of water‐related services under the GATS may not necessarily undermine the ability of governments to introduce the kind of legislative measures necessary to realize poor people's right to water. Still, de facto, the exercise of policy autonomy might be substantially curtailed due to inherent ambiguities in treaty interpretation, the politics of process arising out of power asymmetries, a lack of transparency in processes of negotiation as well as institutional and other deficiencies in the domestic politics of WTO member states.

Suggested Citation

  • Lyla Mehta & Birgit la Cour Madsen, 2005. "Is the WTO after your water? The General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) and poor people's right to water," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 29(2), pages 154-164, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:natres:v:29:y:2005:i:2:p:154-164
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-8947.2005.00124.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-8947.2005.00124.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1477-8947.2005.00124.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ugaz, Cecilia, 2001. "A Public Goods Approach to Regulation of Utilities," WIDER Working Paper Series 009, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    2. Cecilia Ugaz, 2001. "A Public Goods Approach to Regulation of Utilities," WIDER Working Paper Series DP2001-09, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    3. Kikeri, Sunita & Nellis, John & Shirley, Mary, 1994. "Privatization: Lessons from Market Economies," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 9(2), pages 241-272, July.
    4. Frederico Neto & Håkan Tropp, 2000. "Water supply and sanitation services for all: global progress during the 1990s," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 24(3), pages 225-235, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alejandro Jiménez & Agustí Pérez‐Foguet, 2010. "Building the role of local government authorities towards the achievement of the human right to water in rural Tanzania," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 34(2), pages 93-105, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Claessens,Constantijn A. & Djankov, Simeon, 1998. "Politicians and firms in seven central and eastern European countries," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1954, The World Bank.
    2. Tatahi, Motasam, 2010. "Enterprise Performance, Privatization and the Role of Ownership in Italy," MPRA Paper 27059, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Schnytzer, Adi & Andreyeva, Tatiana, 2002. "Company performance in Ukraine: is this a market economy?," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 83-98, June.
    4. Estache, Antonio & Rossi, Martin A., 2008. "Regulatory agencies : impact on firm performance and social welfare," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4509, The World Bank.
    5. Tatahi, Motasam, 2010. "Enterprise Performance, Privatization and the Role of Ownership in Norway," MPRA Paper 27060, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Patrick Plane, 1996. "La privatisation dans les pays en développement : déterminants et conséquences macro-économiques," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 125(4), pages 19-36.
    7. Tatahi, Motasam, 2010. "Enterprise Performance, Privatization and the Role of Ownership in the UK," MPRA Paper 27065, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Tatahi, Motasam, 2010. "Enterprise Performance, Privatization and the Role of Ownership in the Netherlands," MPRA Paper 27067, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Máximo Torero, 2002. "Peruvian Privatization: Impacts On Firm Performance," Research Department Publications 3169, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
    10. Ann P. Bartel and Ann E. Harrison & Ann P. Bartel and Ann E. Harrison, 1999. "Ownership Versus Environment: Why are Public Sector Firms Inefficient?," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series 257, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan.
    11. Kerf, Michel, 2000. "Do state holding companies facilitate private participation in the water sector? evidence from Cote d'Ivoire, the Gambia, Guinea, and Senegal," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2513, The World Bank.
    12. Alcázar, Lorena & Nakasone, Eduardo & Torero, Máximo, 2007. "Provision of Public Services and Welfare of the Poor: Learning from an Incomplete Electricity Privatization Process in Rural Peru," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 3351, Inter-American Development Bank.
    13. Yu, Wusheng & Jensen, Trine Vig, 2003. "Trade Preferences, WTO Negotiations and the LDCs: the case of the "Everything But Arms" Initiative," Conference papers 331124, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    14. Yurii Perevalov & Ilya Gimadii & Vladimir Dobrodei, 2000. "Does Privatisation Improve Performance of Industrial Enterprises? Empirical Evidence from Russia," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(3), pages 337-363.
    15. Motasam Tatahi, 2013. "Enterprise Performance, Privatization and the Role of Ownership in Finland," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 5(3), pages 122-135.
    16. Tatahi, Motasam, 2010. "Enterprise Performance, Privatization and the Role of Ownership in Portugal," MPRA Paper 27063, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Rumen Lazarov, 2001. "The Innovative Activity of the Companies (After the Model of Pleven, Lovech, Veliko Tarnovo and Gabrovo Districts)," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 1, pages 132-158.
    18. Andreyeva Tatiana, 2003. "Company Performance in Ukraine: What Governs its Success," EERC Working Paper Series 03-01e, EERC Research Network, Russia and CIS.
    19. Frédéric Boehm, 2005. "Corrupción y captura en la regulación de los servicios públicos," Revista de Economía Institucional, Universidad Externado de Colombia - Facultad de Economía, vol. 7(13), pages 245-263, July-Dece.
    20. Ann P. Bartel & Ann E. Harrison, 2005. "Ownership Versus Environment: Disentangling the Sources of Public-Sector Inefficiency," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 87(1), pages 135-147, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:natres:v:29:y:2005:i:2:p:154-164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1477-8947 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.