IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/mgtdec/v46y2025i2p1167-1173.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors Influencing the Bid‐Winning of Respondents in the Context of Crowdsourcing

Author

Listed:
  • Yanjing Xu
  • Yue Lu

Abstract

This article takes crowdsourcing as the research background, collects secondary data from the Yipin Freelancer website, constructs panel data of “respondent–date,” and uses the research framework of the elaboration likelihood model (ELM) to study the key factors influencing the bid‐winning probability of respondents. The study found that for the central path, there is a nonlinear inverted U‐shaped relationship between the respondents' success experience and skill diversity and the bid‐winning probability. For the peripheral path of task settings, the study found that a larger task bonus, more bonus recipients, and longer task deadlines are beneficial for respondents to win bids successfully. Finally, this article discusses the theoretical and practical significance of the research.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanjing Xu & Yue Lu, 2025. "Factors Influencing the Bid‐Winning of Respondents in the Context of Crowdsourcing," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 46(2), pages 1167-1173, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:46:y:2025:i:2:p:1167-1173
    DOI: 10.1002/mde.4426
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4426
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/mde.4426?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joel O. Wooten & Karl T. Ulrich, 2017. "Idea Generation and the Role of Feedback: Evidence from Field Experiments with Innovation Tournaments," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(1), pages 80-99, January.
    2. Congcong Yang & Hua Jonathan Ye & Yuanyue Feng, 2021. "Using gamification elements for competitive crowdsourcing: exploring the underlying mechanism," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(9), pages 837-854, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Salgado, Stéphane & Hemonnet-Goujot, Aurelie & Henard, David H. & de Barnier, Virginie, 2020. "The dynamics of innovation contest experience: An integrated framework from the customer’s perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 29-43.
    2. Marieke Funck, 2023. "A Conceptual Framework for Describing the Phenomenon of Hackathons for Entrepreneurial Behavior," Working Papers Dissertations 115, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    3. Yuan Jin & Ho Cheung Brian Lee & Sulin Ba & Jan Stallaert, 2021. "Winning by Learning? Effect of Knowledge Sharing in Crowdsourcing Contests," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 836-859, September.
    4. Abhishek Behl & Brinda Sampat & Sahil Raj, 2025. "An empirical investigation of repeated donations on crowdfunding platforms during COVID-19," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 348(3), pages 1849-1877, May.
    5. Daniel P. Gross, 2020. "Creativity Under Fire: The Effects of Competition on Creative Production," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 102(3), pages 583-599, July.
    6. Stylianos Kavadias & Karl T. Ulrich, 2020. "Innovation and New Product Development: Reflections and Insights from the Research Published in the First 20 Years of Manufacturing & Service Operations Management," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 84-92, January.
    7. Yang, Xi & Zhao, Quanwu & Sun, Heshan, 2022. "Seekers’ complaint behavior in crowdsourcing: An uncertainty perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    8. Nirup Menon & Anant Mishra & Shun Ye, 2020. "Beyond Related Experience: Upstream vs. Downstream Experience in Innovation Contest Platforms with Interdependent Problem Domains," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1045-1065, September.
    9. Pallab Sanyal & Shun Ye, 2024. "An Examination of the Dynamics of Crowdsourcing Contests: Role of Feedback Type," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 394-413, March.
    10. Miyeon Jung & Daegon Cho & Euncheol Shin, 2021. "Repairing a Cracked Mirror: The Heterogeneous Effect of Personalized Digital Nudges Driven by Misperception," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(8), pages 2586-2607, August.
    11. Pei‐Yu Chen & Paul Pavlou & Shinyi Wu & Yang Yang, 2021. "Attracting High‐Quality Contestants to Contest in the Context of Crowdsourcing Contest Platform," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(6), pages 1751-1771, June.
    12. Deichmann, Dirk & Gillier, Thomas & Tonellato, Marco, 2021. "Getting on board with new ideas: An analysis of idea commitments on a crowdsourcing platform," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
    13. Ha Ta & Terry L. Esper & Travis Tokar, 2021. "Appealing to the Crowd: Motivation Message Framing and Crowdsourcing Performance in Retail Operations," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(9), pages 3192-3212, September.
    14. Yujie Wang & Guijie Qi, 2022. "Sustainable Knowledge Contribution in Open Innovation Platforms: An Absorptive Capacity Perspective on Network Effects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-17, May.
    15. Smirnova, Inna & Reitzig, Markus & Alexy, Oliver, 2022. "What makes the right OSS contributor tick? Treatments to motivate high-skilled developers," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(1).
    16. Segev, Ella, 2020. "Crowdsourcing contests," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 281(2), pages 241-255.
    17. Juncai Jiang & Yu Wang, 2020. "A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation of Feedback in Ideation Contests," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(2), pages 481-500, February.
    18. Niek Althuizen & Bo Chen, 2022. "Crowdsourcing Ideas Using Product Prototypes: The Joint Effect of Prototype Enhancement and the Product Design Goal on Idea Novelty," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(4), pages 3008-3025, April.
    19. Wen Zhang & Ting Hou & Qinglong Gou, 2024. "Choosing a self-built or an intermediary platform for hosting winner-take-all crowdsourcing contests?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 336(3), pages 1813-1834, May.
    20. Zhaohui (Zoey) Jiang & Yan Huang & Damian R. Beil, 2021. "The Role of Problem Specification in Crowdsourcing Contests for Design Problems: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(3), pages 637-656, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:46:y:2025:i:2:p:1167-1173. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/7976 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.