IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/mgtdec/v44y2023i5p2869-2884.html

Analysis of decision‐making for value co‐creation in digital innovation systems: An evolutionary game model of complex networks

Author

Listed:
  • Yingying Xu
  • Hui Sun
  • Xichen Lyu

Abstract

Digitalization has reshaped the way of value co‐creation among innovation subjects, expanded the existing innovation ecosystem theories, and triggered the thinking about the digital innovation ecosystem. How to continuously promote value co‐creation between focal companies and non‐focal subjects within the digital innovation ecosystem to elevate the sustainable development of the system is an urgent issue to be solved. In this paper, we built a model of value co‐creation behavior evolution of focal companies and non‐focal subjects in the digital innovation ecosystem based on the complex network evolutionary game theory. The dynamic decision‐making process and critical factors of value co‐creation behavior of focal companies and non‐focal subjects were explored, and the emergence mechanism from micro‐behavior of value co‐creation to macro‐evolution was studied. The results showed that (1) increasing the variability of digital resources shared by focal companies and non‐focal subjects and the level of digital innovation benefits could promote value co‐creation in the system, but digital innovation ecosystems of different scales have various sensitivities to the variability of digital resources and the level of digital innovation benefits; (2) during the initial construction period of digital innovation ecosystems, the distribution of digital innovation benefits should be dominated by focal companies. With the expansion of the ecosystem, the focus of benefit distribution should gradually shift to non‐focal subjects. (3) In the evolution of the digital innovation ecosystem, focal companies should bear relatively more coordination costs of value co‐creation to promote the stable development of the system. (4) It is necessary to establish a punishment mechanism for opportunistic behavior, and the punishment should be gradually increased as the scale of digital innovation ecosystem expands. This study characterizes the digital innovation ecosystem with scale‐free networks in complex networks and constructs a complex network evolutionary game model to study the dynamic decision‐making process of value co‐creation behavior in the system, which makes up for the limitations of traditional evolutionary game research in which game subjects interact in a uniformly mixed manner and highlights the macroscopic phenomena emerging from the dynamic decision‐making of value co‐creation behavior of micro subjects. The research findings have important implications for the co‐creation of value by focal companies and non‐focal subjects in the digital innovation ecosystem and the sustainable development of the system.

Suggested Citation

  • Yingying Xu & Hui Sun & Xichen Lyu, 2023. "Analysis of decision‐making for value co‐creation in digital innovation systems: An evolutionary game model of complex networks," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(5), pages 2869-2884, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:44:y:2023:i:5:p:2869-2884
    DOI: 10.1002/mde.3852
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3852
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/mde.3852?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chae, Bongsug (Kevin), 2019. "A General framework for studying the evolution of the digital innovation ecosystem: The case of big data," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 83-94.
    2. Teece, David J., 2018. "Profiting from innovation in the digital economy: Enabling technologies, standards, and licensing models in the wireless world," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(8), pages 1367-1387.
    3. Gupta, Ranjit & Mejia, Cristian & Kajikawa, Yuya, 2019. "Business, innovation and digital ecosystems landscape survey and knowledge cross sharing," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 100-109.
    4. Beltagui, Ahmad & Rosli, Ainurul & Candi, Marina, 2020. "Exaptation in a digital innovation ecosystem: The disruptive impacts of 3D printing," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    5. Helfat, Constance E. & Raubitschek, Ruth S., 2018. "Dynamic and integrative capabilities for profiting from innovation in digital platform-based ecosystems," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(8), pages 1391-1399.
    6. Storbacka, Kaj & Brodie, Roderick J. & Böhmann, Tilo & Maglio, Paul P. & Nenonen, Suvi, 2016. "Actor engagement as a microfoundation for value co-creation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 3008-3017.
    7. Joana Costa & João C.O. Matias, 2020. "Open Innovation 4.0 as an Enhancer of Sustainable Innovation Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-19, October.
    8. Senyo, Prince Kwame & Liu, Kecheng & Effah, John, 2019. "Digital business ecosystem: Literature review and a framework for future research," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 52-64.
    9. Granstrand, Ove & Holgersson, Marcus, 2020. "Innovation ecosystems: A conceptual review and a new definition," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 90.
    10. Douglas P. Hannah & Kathleen M. Eisenhardt, 2018. "How firms navigate cooperation and competition in nascent ecosystems," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(12), pages 3163-3192, December.
    11. Ling Ding & Jinxi Wu, 2017. "Innovation Ecosystem of CNG Vehicles: A Case Study of Its Cultivation and Characteristics in Sichuan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.
    12. Min-Ren Yan & Kuo-Ming Chien & Lin-Ya Hong & Tai-Ning Yang, 2018. "Evaluating the Collaborative Ecosystem for an Innovation-Driven Economy: A Systems Analysis and Case Study of Science Parks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-13, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gorelova Irina & Rudko Ihor & D’Ascenzo Fabrizio & Bellini Francesco, 2025. "Conceptualizing and defining digital innovation ecosystems: A systematic literature review," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 20(1), pages 64-82.
    2. Ning, Jiajun & Xiong, Lixin & Shao, Changhua, 2025. "Dynamic evolution analysis of enterprises digital technology innovation strategies in energy supply chain collaboration: A bargaining theory perspective," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    3. Liu, Jicheng & Sun, Jiakang & Bao, Hongyan & Lu, Yunyuan, 2025. "Research on value co-creation of green hydrogen value chain considering carbon emission trading: A multi-layer complex network evolutionary game perspective," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gomes, Leonardo Augusto de Vasconcelos & Flechas, Ximena Alejandra & Facin, Ana Lucia Figueiredo & Borini, Felipe Mendes, 2021. "Ecosystem management: Past achievements and future promises," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    2. Baldwin, Carliss Y. & Bogers, Marcel L.A.M. & Kapoor, Rahul & West, Joel, 2024. "Focusing the ecosystem lens on innovation studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(3).
    3. Xie, Xuemei & Liu, Xiaojie & Blanco, Cristina, 2023. "Evaluating and forecasting the niche fitness of regional innovation ecosystems: A comparative evaluation of different optimized grey models," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    4. Silva, Lucas Emmanuel Nascimento & Gomes, Leonardo Augusto de Vasconcelos & Faria, Aline Mariane de & Borini, Felipe Mendes, 2024. "Innovation processes in ecosystem settings: An integrative framework and future directions," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    5. Shi, Xianwei & Liang, Xingkun & Luo, Yining, 2023. "Unpacking the intellectual structure of ecosystem research in innovation studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).
    6. Bohnsack, René & Rennings, Michael & Block, Carolin & Bröring, Stefanie, 2024. "Profiting from innovation when digital business ecosystems emerge: A control point perspective," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(3).
    7. Mingqiu Li & Heng Chen & Jinqiu Li & Xiaolei Liu, 2023. "How to Improve the Synergetic Development Capabilities of the Innovation Ecosystems of High-Tech Industries in China: An fsQCA Analysis Based on the TOE Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-32, August.
    8. Gorelova Irina & Rudko Ihor & D’Ascenzo Fabrizio & Bellini Francesco, 2025. "Conceptualizing and defining digital innovation ecosystems: A systematic literature review," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 20(1), pages 64-82.
    9. Burström, Thommie & Lahti, Tom & Parida, Vinit & Wartiovaara, Markus & Wincent, Joakim, 2023. "A definition, review, and extension of global ecosystems theory: Trends, architecture and orchestration of global VCs and mechanisms behind unicorns," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    10. Hou, Hong & Shi, Yongjiang, 2021. "Ecosystem-as-structure and ecosystem-as-coevolution: A constructive examination," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    11. Draschbacher, Thomas & Rachinger, Michael & Engwall, Mats, 2025. "To solve or to occupy: Addressing hybrid bottlenecks in innovation ecosystems," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    12. Uzunca, Bilgehan & Sharapov, Dmitry & Tee, Richard, 2022. "Governance rigidity, industry evolution, and value capture in platform ecosystems," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(7).
    13. Reischauer, Georg & Engelmann, Alexander & Gawer, Annabelle & Hoffmann, Werner H., 2024. "The slipstream strategy: How high-status OEMs coopete with platforms to maintain their digital extensions' edge," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(7).
    14. Constance E. Helfat & Aseem Kaul & David J. Ketchen & Jay B. Barney & Olivier Chatain & Harbir Singh, 2023. "Renewing the resource‐based view: New contexts, new concepts, and new methods," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(6), pages 1357-1390, June.
    15. Alexandra Elena Carst & Yimei Hu, 2024. "Complementors as ecosystem actors: a systematic review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(4), pages 2579-2635, December.
    16. Yanzhang Gu & Longying Hu & Hongjin Zhang & Chenxuan Hou, 2021. "Innovation Ecosystem Research: Emerging Trends and Future Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-21, October.
    17. Jiatao Li & Liang Chen & Jingtao Yi & Jiye Mao & Jianwen Liao, 2019. "Ecosystem-specific advantages in international digital commerce," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(9), pages 1448-1463, December.
    18. Miehé, Lucas & Palmié, Maximilian & Oghazi, Pejvak, 2023. "Connection successfully established: How complementors use connectivity technologies to join existing ecosystems – Four archetype strategies from the mobility sector," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    19. Wei, Zelong & Zhang, Dejian, 2025. "Speed advantages or profiting from imitation? The imitation dilemma in the follower strategy," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    20. Stornelli, Aldo & Simms, Christopher & Reim, Wiebke & Ozcan, Sercan, 2024. "Exploring the dynamic capabilities of technology provider ecosystems: A study of smart manufacturing projects," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:44:y:2023:i:5:p:2869-2884. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/7976 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.