IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jpamgt/v8y1989i4p593-612.html

Benefit estimation goes to court: The case of natural resource damage assessments

Author

Listed:
  • Raymond J. Kopp
  • V. Kerry Smith

Abstract

This article evaluates the feasibility of performing natural resource damage assessments under the current Superfund legislation. Using the analyses developed for two recent cases, it explains the sources of the substantial divergences between plaintiffs' and defendants' estimates of these damages. Three factors explain the differences in damage estimates: (1) the time horizon used and treatment of capitalization effects of past damages; (2) the extent of the market assumed in estimating the effects of a release of hazardous wastes on the demand for the affected natural resource; and (3) the character and availability of substitutes for the resource involved.

Suggested Citation

  • Raymond J. Kopp & V. Kerry Smith, 1989. "Benefit estimation goes to court: The case of natural resource damage assessments," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 8(4), pages 593-612.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:8:y:1989:i:4:p:593-612
    DOI: 10.2307/3325046
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/3325046
    File Function: Link to full text; subscription required
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2307/3325046?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Axel Klaphake & Volkmar Hartje & Jürgen Meyerhoff, 2005. "Die Monetarisierung ökologischer Schäden in einer europäischen Haftungsregelung: Anmerkungen zur Schadensbewertung angesichts der Erfahrungen in den USA," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 6(1), pages 23-39, February.
    2. Smith, V. Kerry, 2023. "Accounting for income inequality in benefit transfers: The importance of the income elasticity of WTP," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    3. Patrick Point, 1992. "Les services rendus par le patrimoine naturel : une évaluation fondée sur des principes économiques," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 258(1), pages 11-18.
    4. V. Kerry Smith, 2018. "Benefits Transfer: Current Practice and Prospects," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 69(3), pages 449-466, March.
    5. Christian A. Vossler & Timothy N. Cason & James J. Murphy & Paul J. Ferraro & Todd L. Cherry & George Loewenstein & Peter Martinsson & Jason F. Shogren & Leaf van Boven & Daan van Soest, 2024. "The impact of experiments on environmental policy and natural resource management," Working Papers 2024-05, University of Tennessee, Department of Economics.
    6. Marc D. Davidson, 2017. "Equity and the Conservation of Global Ecosystem Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-15, February.
    7. V. Kerry Smith & Carol Mansfield, 2015. "The design of benefit–cost architecture for homeland security policy analysis," Chapters, in: Carol Mansfield & V. K. Smith (ed.), Benefit–Cost Analyses for Security Policies, chapter 2, pages 26-60, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Blam Inna, 2005. "Households' Demand for Higher Environmental Quality: The Case of Russia," EERC Working Paper Series 05-08e, EERC Research Network, Russia and CIS.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:8:y:1989:i:4:p:593-612. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/34787/home .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.