IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jjmath/v2022y2022i1n9822339.html

Performance Evaluation of Public Management in View of Fuzzy DEA Model

Author

Listed:
  • Meiping Zhi

Abstract

The research on management performance evaluation and governance countermeasures of public utilities, as an important entry point, focus, and flash point of the combination of management science, engineering research, and public management research, not only highlights the implementation and implementation of the scientific outlook on development and correct outlook on political performance, so that the topic has distinct theoretical frontier, practical pertinence, and practical guidance. It also highlights the intersection and integration of multiple disciplines, combines normative research with empirical research, qualitative research with quantitative research, macro research with micro research, and method and technology research with concept innovation and institutional arrangement research, and strives to realize the integration and complementarity of research methods of management science and engineering and public management. The research of public management broadens new horizons, expands new fields, and provides new paradigms, methods, and means. Based on the weight of public utilities management performance evaluation indicators and the selection of empirical samples, this paper studies the basic principles and comparative advantages of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model and DEA model, makes an empirical evaluation of public utilities management performance, draws evaluation conclusions, and analyzes the key factors affecting and restricting the level of public utilities management performance. From the research level of evaluation technology and methods to the level of institutional arrangement, it is the only way to realize the scientific, standardized, and institutionalized performance evaluation of local government public utilities management. The basic procedures of performance evaluation and the performance evaluation mechanism are introduced, and the establishment and improvement of the information fidelity system and result application system of public utilities performance evaluation are studied. Based on the evaluation conclusion and empirical analysis of public utilities management performance, aiming at the key factors affecting the level of public utilities management performance, this paper puts forward the governance countermeasures of public utilities from the aspects of establishing scientific public utilities management performance concept, innovating public utilities management system, establishing and perfecting public utilities investment management mechanism, and so on.

Suggested Citation

  • Meiping Zhi, 2022. "Performance Evaluation of Public Management in View of Fuzzy DEA Model," Journal of Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2022(1).
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jjmath:v:2022:y:2022:i:1:n:9822339
    DOI: 10.1155/2022/9822339
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9822339
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2022/9822339?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mahinda Wijesiri & Almudena Martínez-Campillo & Peter Wanke, 2019. "Is there a trade-off between social and financial performance of public commercial banks in India? A multi-activity DEA model with shared inputs and undesirable outputs," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 417-442, April.
    2. Mohsni, Sana & Otchere, Isaac, 2018. "Does regulatory regime matter for bank risk taking? A comparative analysis of US and Canada," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1-16.
    3. Jilde Garst & Vincent Blok & Léon Jansen & Onno S. W. F. Omta, 2017. "Responsibility versus Profit: The Motives of Food Firms for Healthy Product Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-29, December.
    4. Tan, Yong, 2016. "The impacts of risk and competition on bank profitability in China," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 85-110.
    5. Jalil Heidary Dahooie & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Amir Salar Vanaki & Hamid Reza Firoozfar & Mahnaz Lari & Zenonas Turskis, 2019. "A new evaluation model for corporate financial performance using integrated CCSD and FCM-ARAS approach," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 1088-1113, January.
    6. Azmi, Wajahat & Ali, Mohsin & Arshad, Shaista & Rizvi, Syed Aun R., 2019. "Intricacies of competition, stability, and diversification: Evidence from dual banking economies," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 111-126.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shailesh Rastogi & Rajani Gupte & R. Meenakshi, 2021. "A Holistic Perspective on Bank Performance Using Regulation, Profitability, and Risk-Taking with a View on Ownership Concentration," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Killins, Robert N. & Mollick, Andre V., 2020. "Performance of Canadian banks and oil price movements," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    3. Killins, Robert N., 2020. "Firm-specific, industry-specific and macroeconomic factors of life insurers’ profitability: Evidence from Canada," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    4. Faluk Shair & Na Sun & Sun Shaorong & Firdos Atta & Muhammad Hussain, 2019. "Impacts of risk and competition on the profitability of banks: Empirical evidence from Pakistan," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-27, November.
    5. Marwa Sallemi & Salah Ben Hamad & Nejla Ould Daoud Ellili, 2023. "Executive compensation and bank’s stability: which role of the corruption control? An empirical evidence from OECD banks," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(2), pages 457-477, June.
    6. Rubén Chavarín, 2020. "Risk governance, banks affiliated to business groups, and foreign ownership," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(1), pages 1-37, March.
    7. Buu Kiem Dang & Duc Toan Vo & Nguyen Tuyet Minh Ha, 2025. "The impact of economic uncertainty and institutional quality on bank profitability: global evidence," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 1-29, July.
    8. Ana Labella-Fernández & M. Mar Serrano-Arcos & Belén Payán-Sánchez, 2021. "Firm Growth as a Driver of Sustainable Product Innovation: Mediation and Moderation Analysis. Evidence from Manufacturing Firms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-22, March.
    9. Anupam Das Gupta & Syed Moudud-Ul-Huq, 2020. "Do competition and revenue diversification have significant effect on risk-taking? Empirical evidence from BRICS banks," International Journal of Financial Engineering (IJFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 7(01), pages 1-28, March.
    10. Paroush, Jacob & Schreiber, Ben Z., 2019. "Profitability, capital, and risk in US commercial and savings banks: Re-examination of estimation methods," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 148-162.
    11. Protap Kumar Ghosh & Fakarudin Kamarudin & Saira Kharuddin, 2026. "Country’s regulatory system and non-performing loans: moderating effect of country’s income level," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 1-27, April.
    12. Olszak, Małgorzata & Kowalska, Iwona, 2023. "Do competition and market structure affect sensitivity of bank profitability to the business cycle?," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    13. Cepi Pahlevi & Andi Ruslan, 2019. "Effect of Market Structure and Financial Characteristics on Bank Performance in Indonesia," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 9(3), pages 128-139, July.
    14. Hasan, Iftekhar & Wang, Haizhi & Yin, Desheng & Zhang, Jingqi, 2021. "Global equity offerings and access to domestic loan market: U.S. evidence," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    15. Ali, Mohsin & Azmi, Wajahat & Kowsalya, V. & Rizvi, Syed Aun R., 2023. "Interlinkages between stability, carbon emissions and the ESG disclosures: Global evidence from banking industry," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    16. Killins, Robert N. & Egly, Peter V. & Batabyal, Sourav, 2021. "The impact of the yield curve on bank equity returns: Evidence from Canada," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 319-329.
    17. Shican Liu & Yanli Zhou & Benchawan Wiwatanapataphee & Yonghong Wu & Xiangyu Ge, 2018. "The Study of Utility Valuation of Single-Name Credit Derivatives with the Fast-Scale Stochastic Volatility Correction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, March.
    18. Helmi Hamdi & Abdelaziz Hakimi, 2019. "Does Liquidity Matter on Bank Profitability? Evidence from a Nonlinear Framework for a Large Sample," Business and Economics Research Journal, Bursa Uludag University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, vol. 10(1), pages 13-26.
    19. Oier Imaz & Andoni Eizagirre, 2020. "Responsible Innovation for Sustainable Development Goals in Business: An Agenda for Cooperative Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-20, August.
    20. Hafeez, Bilal & Li, Xiping & Kabir, M. Humayun & Tripe, David, 2022. "Measuring bank risk: Forward-looking z-score," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jjmath:v:2022:y:2022:i:1:n:9822339. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/1469 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.