IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jjmath/v2022y2022i1n9773525.html

Evaluation Method and Simulation of Accounting Integrity in View of Grey Correlation Model

Author

Listed:
  • Cai Li

Abstract

Accounting dishonesty is still a problem that is far from being solved, both in theory and in practice. In the existing research on accounting dishonesty, scholars mostly analyze the causes and countermeasures of the lack of accounting integrity from the aspects of external accounting system and internal corporate governance and fail to establish a theoretical system and analytical framework for accounting integrity analysis. This limitation inevitably makes the analysis stay on the surface of things with lack of a deep grasp of its essential problems. Through the study of the relevant literature, the grey correlation model can sort the proportion of the factors affecting accounting integrity and get the primary and secondary factors affecting accounting integrity, so as to put forward more targeted countermeasures to solve the problem of accounting integrity. Based on this, this paper uses the method of combining theory with practice to study the problem of accounting integrity. Combined with the current situation of accounting integrity, this paper uses the grey correlation model to sort the proportion of the factors affecting accounting integrity, analyzes its specific reasons, and finally puts forward the measures to solve the dilemma of accounting integrity according to the analysis results. In view of the problems of enterprise accounting integrity, it is necessary to strengthen the publicity and education of accounting practitioners’ integrity system. Accelerate the construction of the legal system of accounting integrity and promote the legislation of accounting integrity. A full‐time organization for accounting integrity evaluation should be established to measure the accounting integrity of enterprises by using reasonable evaluation means and methods, clear and standardized evaluation contents, and integrity level standards.

Suggested Citation

  • Cai Li, 2022. "Evaluation Method and Simulation of Accounting Integrity in View of Grey Correlation Model," Journal of Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2022(1).
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jjmath:v:2022:y:2022:i:1:n:9773525
    DOI: 10.1155/2022/9773525
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9773525
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2022/9773525?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diogo Cunha Ferreira & Rui Cunha Marques, 2016. "Malmquist and Hicks–Moorsteen Productivity Indexes for Clusters Performance Evaluation," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(05), pages 1015-1053, September.
    2. FANG Hong, . "Discussion on the Performance Evaluation Index System of Basic Course Teaching Team in Colleges and Universities," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 12(03).
    3. Mendola, Daria & Volo, Serena, 2017. "Building composite indicators in tourism studies: Measurements and applications in tourism destination competitiveness," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 541-553.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Salinas Fernández, José Antonio & Guaita Martínez, José Manuel & Martín Martín, José María, 2022. "An analysis of the competitiveness of the tourism industry in a context of economic recovery following the COVID19 pandemic," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    2. Ferreira, D.C. & Marques, R.C., 2019. "Do quality and access to hospital services impact on their technical efficiency?," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 218-236.
    3. Delia Popescu & Iulia Monica Oehler-Sincai & Daniel Bulin & Ion Alexandru Tanase, 2018. "Cee-16: A Cluster Analysis Based on Tourism Competitiveness and Correlations With Major Determinants," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 20(S12), pages 833-833, November.
    4. Jiao, Jianling & Song, Jiangfeng & Ding, Tao, 2024. "The impact of synergistic development of renewable energy and digital economy on energy intensity: Evidence from 33 countries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    5. Francisco E. Cabrera & Manuel Amaya & Gustavo Fabián Vaccaro Witt & José Ignacio Peláez, 2019. "Pairwise Voting to Rank Touristic Destinations Based on Preference Valuation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-13, October.
    6. Laura Grassini & Alessandro Magrini & Enrico Conti, 2023. "Formative-reflective scheme for the assessment of tourism destination competitiveness: an analysis of Italian municipalities," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 3523-3548, August.
    7. Yung-Lun Liu & Pen-Fa Ko & Jui-Te Chiang, 2021. "Developing an Evaluation Model for Monitoring Country-Based Tourism Competitiveness," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, September.
    8. FAUR Monica & BAN Olimpia, 2020. "Theoretical Framework About Tourism Destination Competitiveness," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 32-38, July.
    9. Juan Carlos Martin, 2017. "Regional Spanish Tourism Competitiveness. A DEA-MONITUR approach," REGION, European Regional Science Association, vol. 4, pages 153-173.
    10. Salvatore Greco & Alessio Ishizaka & Menelaos Tasiou & Gianpiero Torrisi, 2019. "On the Methodological Framework of Composite Indices: A Review of the Issues of Weighting, Aggregation, and Robustness," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 141(1), pages 61-94, January.
    11. Maysa Ali Selim & Noura Anwar Abdel-Fattah & Yasmine Sabry Hegazi, 2021. "A Composite Index to Measure Smartness and Competitiveness of Heritage Tourism Destination and Historic Building," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-24, November.
    12. Tihana Škrinjarić, 2021. "Ranking Environmental Aspects of Sustainable Tourism: Case of Selected European Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-19, May.
    13. Liang Zhu & Lingxue Zhan & Shaobo (Kevin) Li, 2021. "Is sustainable development reasonable for tourism destinations? An empirical study of the relationship between environmental competitiveness and tourism growth," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(1), pages 66-78, January.
    14. Zeynep Aktaş Çimen & Didem Kutlu & Kazım Sarıçoban & Utku Ongun, 2024. "The Competitiveness of Turkish Tourism in the Global Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-18, December.
    15. Juan Carlos Martín & Alessandro Indelicato, 2022. "A DEA MCDM Approach Applied to ESS8 Dataset for Measuring Immigration and Refugees Citizens’ Openness," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 1941-1961, December.
    16. Víctor Ernesto Pérez León & Maria Amparo León Sánchez & Flor Mª Guerrero, 2021. "Central American and Caribbean tourism destinations’ competitiveness: A temporal approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-24, May.
    17. Wei Guo & Xin Zhang, 2022. "Regional Tourism Performance Research: Knowledge Foundation, Discipline Structure, and Academic Frontier," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    18. Zahra Ardakani & Fabio Bartolini & Gianluca Brunori, 2020. "New Evaluation of Small Farms: Implication for an Analysis of Food Security," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, March.
    19. Mocholi-Arce, Manuel & Sala-Garrido, Ramon & Molinos-Senante, Maria & Maziotis, Alexandros, 2021. "Water company productivity change: A disaggregated approach accounting for changes in inputs and outputs," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    20. Hoon-Ku Sul & Xiaoting Chi & Heesup Han, 2020. "Measurement Development for Tourism Destination Business Environment and Competitive Advantages," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-20, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jjmath:v:2022:y:2022:i:1:n:9773525. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/1469 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.