IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jjmath/v2022y2022i1n9503460.html

Performance of the Ridge and Liu Estimators in the zero‐inflated Bell Regression Model

Author

Listed:
  • Zakariya Yahya Algamal
  • Adewale F. Lukman
  • Mohamed R. Abonazel
  • Fuad A. Awwad

Abstract

The Poisson regression model is popularly used to model count data. However, the model suffers drawbacks when there is overdispersion—when the mean of the Poisson distribution is not the same as the variance. In this situation, the Bell regression model fits well to the data. Also, there is a high tendency of excess zeros in the count data. In this case, the zero‐inflated Bell regression model is an alternative to the Bell regression model. The parameters of the zero‐inflated Bell regression model are mostly estimated using the method of maximum likelihood. Linear dependency is a threat in a real‐life application when modeling the relationship between the response variable and two or more explanatory variables in a generalized linear model such as the zero‐inflated Bell regression model. It reduced the efficiency of the maximum likelihood estimator. Therefore, we developed the ridge and Liu estimators for the zero‐inflated Bell regression model to deal with this issue. The simulation and application results support the dominance of the proposed methods over the conventional maximum likelihood estimator.

Suggested Citation

  • Zakariya Yahya Algamal & Adewale F. Lukman & Mohamed R. Abonazel & Fuad A. Awwad, 2022. "Performance of the Ridge and Liu Estimators in the zero‐inflated Bell Regression Model," Journal of Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2022(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jjmath:v:2022:y:2022:i:1:n:9503460
    DOI: 10.1155/2022/9503460
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9503460
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2022/9503460?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Muhammad Amin & Muhammad Qasim & Muhammad Amanullah & Saima Afzal, 2020. "Performance of some ridge estimators for the gamma regression model," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(3), pages 997-1026, June.
    2. Muhammad Nauman Akram & Muhammad Amin & Faiza Sami & Adam Braima Mastor & Omer Mohamed Egeh & Abdisalam Hassan Muse, 2022. "A New Conway Maxwell–Poisson Liu Regression Estimator—Method and Application," Journal of Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2022(1).
    3. Kibria, B. M. Golam & Månsson, Kristofer & Shukur, Ghazi, 2011. "A Ridge Regression estimator for the zero-inflated Poisson model," Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation 257, Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies.
    4. Månsson, Kristofer & Shukur, Ghazi, 2011. "A Poisson ridge regression estimator," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 1475-1481, July.
    5. Muhammad Nauman Akram & Muhammad Amin & Faiza Sami & Adam Braima Mastor & Omer Mohamed Egeh & Abdisalam Hassan Muse & Georgios Psarrakos, 2022. "A New Conway Maxwell–Poisson Liu Regression Estimator—Method and Application," Journal of Mathematics, Hindawi, vol. 2022, pages 1-12, March.
    6. Cameron, A. Colin & Trivedi, Pravin K., 1990. "Regression-based tests for overdispersion in the Poisson model," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 347-364, December.
    7. Hans Nyquist, 1991. "Restricted Estimation of Generalized Linear Models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 40(1), pages 133-141, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. M. Revan Özkale & Atif Abbasi, 2022. "Iterative restricted OK estimator in generalized linear models and the selection of tuning parameters via MSE and genetic algorithm," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 63(6), pages 1979-2040, December.
    2. Bushra Ashraf & Muhammad Amin & Walid Emam & Yusra Tashkandy & Muhammad Faisal, 2025. "Negative Binomial Regression Model Estimation Using Stein Approach: Methods, Simulation, and Applications," Journal of Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2025(1).
    3. Månsson, Kristofer, 2012. "On ridge estimators for the negative binomial regression model," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 178-184.
    4. Asiye Aslan & Ali Osman Büyükköse, 2025. "Comparative Performance Analysis of Machine Learning-Based Annual and Seasonal Approaches for Power Output Prediction in Combined Cycle Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-28, September.
    5. Muhammad Amin & Muhammad Qasim & Muhammad Amanullah & Saima Afzal, 2020. "Performance of some ridge estimators for the gamma regression model," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(3), pages 997-1026, June.
    6. Ulduz Mammadova & M. Revan Özkale, 2024. "Detecting shifts in Conway–Maxwell–Poisson profile with deviance residual-based CUSUM and EWMA charts under multicollinearity," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 65(2), pages 597-643, April.
    7. Akhil Rao & Francesca Letizia, 2022. "An integrated debris environment assessment model," Papers 2205.05205, arXiv.org.
    8. Becker Bettina & Theuringer Martin, 2001. "Macroeconomic Determinants of Contingent Protection: The Case of the European Union," Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 50(3), pages 350-374, December.
    9. Luiz Paulo Fávero & Joseph F. Hair & Rafael de Freitas Souza & Matheus Albergaria & Talles V. Brugni, 2021. "Zero-Inflated Generalized Linear Mixed Models: A Better Way to Understand Data Relationships," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-28, May.
    10. Rui Baptista & Joana Mendonça, 2010. "Proximity to knowledge sources and the location of knowledge-based start-ups," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 45(1), pages 5-29, August.
    11. Boncinelli, Fabio & Bartolini, Fabio & Casini, Leonardo, 2018. "Structural factors of labour allocation for farm diversification activities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 204-212.
    12. Steven F. Kreft & Nancy M. Epling, 2007. "Do border crossings contribute to underage motor‐vehicle fatalities? An analysis of Michigan border crossings," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(3), pages 765-781, August.
    13. Agostino Capponi & Zhaonan Qu, 2025. "Handling Sparse Non-negative Data in Finance," Papers 2509.01478, arXiv.org.
    14. Greene, William, 2007. "Functional Form and Heterogeneity in Models for Count Data," Foundations and Trends(R) in Econometrics, now publishers, vol. 1(2), pages 113-218, August.
    15. Christopher J. W. Zorn, 1998. "An Analytic and Empirical Examination of Zero-Inflated and Hurdle Poisson Specifications," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 26(3), pages 368-400, February.
    16. Jim Millington, 2000. "Migration and Age: The Effect of Age on Sensitivity to Migration Stimuli," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(6), pages 521-533.
    17. Adewale F. Lukman & B. M. Golam Kibria & Cosmas K. Nziku & Muhammad Amin & Emmanuel T. Adewuyi & Rasha Farghali, 2023. "K-L Estimator: Dealing with Multicollinearity in the Logistic Regression Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-14, January.
    18. Christian Kleiber & Achim Zeileis, 2016. "Visualizing Count Data Regressions Using Rootograms," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(3), pages 296-303, July.
    19. Bertoli, Simone & Marchetta, Francesca, 2015. "Bringing It All Back Home – Return Migration and Fertility Choices," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 27-40.
    20. Paul Kwame Nkegbe & Naasegnibe Kuunibe & Samuel Sekyi, 2017. "Poverty and malaria morbidity in the Jirapa District of Ghana: A count regression approach," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 1293472-129, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jjmath:v:2022:y:2022:i:1:n:9503460. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/1469 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.