IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/greenh/v11y2021i3p539-553.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methodological approaches for estimating regional emission values using national greenhouse gas inventory: A case study of the Republic of Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Jong‐Ik Yoo
  • Do‐Hyung Lee
  • Yu‐Kyong Cheong
  • So‐Hee Kim
  • Yu‐Sik Jeong
  • Dae‐Han Lee
  • Sung‐Kwon Park
  • Moon‐Jung Kim

Abstract

Since the Paris Agreement in 2015, the greenhouse gas (GHG) inventory has been considered as an indicator in the evaluation of national GHG reduction. Despite the importance of achieving and evaluating the national GHG reduction targets by the local government, GHG information availed to local governments is very limited, thus necessitating the use of additional resources to create a GHG inventory for each region. This study established and introduced procedures for the selection and distribution of activity data using a national inventory to allow for the estimation of emission values according to region and used them to calculate emissions in Korea. Statistics that were not based on regional data or those based on different data collection systems were identified, and in such cases, data required improvement to achieve consistency. Emission estimation showed that the applied activity data was consistent with the sum of the regional and national values for 12% of GHG emissions. We expect the improvement of certain statistical data to improve data consistency to 82% within a ± 5% variance. With this method, the consistency between the emission data at the national and local or regional levels can be ensured, and ultimately used to establish or evaluate the implementation of a GHG reduction plan. The proposed method can be particularly useful when capacity enhancement of local governments in developing countries is required for GHG inventory management. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Jong‐Ik Yoo & Do‐Hyung Lee & Yu‐Kyong Cheong & So‐Hee Kim & Yu‐Sik Jeong & Dae‐Han Lee & Sung‐Kwon Park & Moon‐Jung Kim, 2021. "Methodological approaches for estimating regional emission values using national greenhouse gas inventory: A case study of the Republic of Korea," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 11(3), pages 539-553, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:11:y:2021:i:3:p:539-553
    DOI: 10.1002/ghg.2065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.2065
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ghg.2065?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hermannsson, Kristinn & McIntyre, Stuart G., 2014. "Local consumption and territorial based accounting for CO2 emissions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 1-11.
    2. Eun-Mi Been & Young-Kwon Park & Kyung-Tae Kim, 2020. "Comparative study of greenhouse gas emissions between national government and local governments in Korea," Energy & Environment, , vol. 31(8), pages 1403-1415, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hongli Zhang & Lei Shen & Shuai Zhong & Ayman Elshkaki, 2020. "Economic Structure Transformation and Low-Carbon Development in Energy-Rich Cities: The Case of the Contiguous Area of Shanxi and Shaanxi Provinces, and Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Dolter, Brett & Victor, Peter A., 2016. "Casting a long shadow: Demand-based accounting of Canada's greenhouse gas emissions responsibility," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 156-164.
    3. Baiardi, Donatella, 2020. "Do sustainable energy policies matter for reducing air pollution?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    4. Mattia Cai, 2021. "Doubly constrained gravity models for interregional trade estimation," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 100(2), pages 455-474, April.
    5. Clara Lenk & Rosalie Arendt & Vanessa Bach & Matthias Finkbeiner, 2021. "Territorial-Based vs. Consumption-Based Carbon Footprint of an Urban District—A Case Study of Berlin-Wedding," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-18, June.
    6. Dvořák, Petr & Martinát, Stanislav & der Horst, Dan Van & Frantál, Bohumil & Turečková, Kamila, 2017. "Renewable energy investment and job creation; a cross-sectoral assessment for the Czech Republic with reference to EU benchmarks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 360-368.
    7. Majumdar, Devleena & Kar, Saibal, 2017. "Does technology diffusion help to reduce emission intensity? Evidence from organized manufacturing and agriculture in India," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 30-41.
    8. Guangwu Chen & Thomas Wiedmann & Michalis Hadjikakou & Hazel Rowley, 2016. "City Carbon Footprint Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-16, July.
    9. Baiardi, Donatella, 2019. "Do sustainable energy policies matter for reducing greenhouse gas emissions?," EconStor Preprints 202077, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    10. Chen, Guangwu & Wiedmann, Thomas & Wang, Yafei & Hadjikakou, Michalis, 2016. "Transnational city carbon footprint networks – Exploring carbon links between Australian and Chinese cities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1082-1092.
    11. Donatella Baiardi, 2020. "Do sustainable energy policies matter for reducing greenhouse gas emissions?," Working Papers 425, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics, revised Jan 2020.
    12. Greg Marsden & Jillian Anable, 2021. "Behind the Targets? The Case for Coherence in a Multi-Scalar Approach to Carbon Action Plans in the Transport Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-18, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:11:y:2021:i:3:p:539-553. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.