IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/emetrp/v93y2025i4p1449-1480.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fiduciary Duty and the Market for Financial Advice

Author

Listed:
  • Vivek Bhattacharya
  • Gastón Illanes
  • Manisha Padi

Abstract

Fiduciary duty aims to solve principal‐agent problems, and the United States is in the middle of a protracted debate surrounding the merits of extending it to all financial advisers. Leveraging a transaction‐level data set of deferred annuities and state‐level variation in common law fiduciary duty, we find that it raises risk‐adjusted returns by 25 bp and leads to a 16% decline in the entry of affected firms. Through the lens of a model of entry and advice provision, we show that this effect can be due to both an increase in fixed costs and an increase in the cost of providing low‐quality advice. We show how to disentangle these channels and find that both are empirically relevant. Counterfactual simulations show that further increases in the stringency of fiduciary duty monotonically improve advice quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Vivek Bhattacharya & Gastón Illanes & Manisha Padi, 2025. "Fiduciary Duty and the Market for Financial Advice," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 93(4), pages 1449-1480, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:emetrp:v:93:y:2025:i:4:p:1449-1480
    DOI: 10.3982/ECTA18492
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA18492
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3982/ECTA18492?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:emetrp:v:93:y:2025:i:4:p:1449-1480. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/essssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.