IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/emetrp/v89y2021i4p1855-1879.html

TV Advertising Effectiveness and Profitability: Generalizable Results From 288 Brands

Author

Listed:
  • Bradley T. Shapiro
  • Günter J. Hitsch
  • Anna E. Tuchman

Abstract

We estimate the distribution of television advertising elasticities and the distribution of the advertising return on investment (ROI) for a large number of products in many categories. Our results reveal substantially smaller advertising elasticities compared to the results documented in the literature, as well as a sizable percentage of statistically insignificant or negative estimates. The results are robust to functional form assumptions and are not driven by insufficient statistical power or measurement error. The ROI analysis shows negative ROIs at the margin for more than 80% of brands, implying over‐investment in advertising by most firms. Further, the overall ROI of the observed advertising schedule is only positive for one third of all brands.

Suggested Citation

  • Bradley T. Shapiro & Günter J. Hitsch & Anna E. Tuchman, 2021. "TV Advertising Effectiveness and Profitability: Generalizable Results From 288 Brands," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 89(4), pages 1855-1879, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:emetrp:v:89:y:2021:i:4:p:1855-1879
    DOI: 10.3982/ECTA17674
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA17674
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3982/ECTA17674?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jörg L Spenkuch & David Toniatti, 2018. "Political Advertising and Election Results," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 133(4), pages 1981-2036.
    2. Thomas Blake & Chris Nosko & Steven Tadelis, 2015. "Consumer Heterogeneity and Paid Search Effectiveness: A Large‐Scale Field Experiment," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 83, pages 155-174, January.
    3. Randall Lewis & Dan Nguyen, 2015. "Display advertising’s competitive spillovers to consumer search," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 93-115, June.
    4. Glenn Ellison & Sara Fisher Ellison, 2011. "Strategic Entry Deterrence and the Behavior of Pharmaceutical Incumbents Prior to Patent Expiration," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 3(1), pages 1-36, February.
    5. Ron N. Borkovsky & Avi Goldfarb & Avery M. Haviv & Sridhar Moorthy, 2017. "Measuring and Understanding Brand Value in a Dynamic Model of Brand Management," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(4), pages 471-499, July.
    6. Aviv Nevo, 2000. "Mergers with Differentiated Products: The Case of the Ready-to-Eat Cereal Industry," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 31(3), pages 395-421, Autumn.
    7. Michael Sinkinson & Amanda Starc, 2019. "Ask Your Doctor? Direct-to-Consumer Advertising of Pharmaceuticals," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 86(2), pages 836-881.
    8. Bradley T. Shapiro, 2018. "Positive Spillovers and Free Riding in Advertising of Prescription Pharmaceuticals: The Case of Antidepressants," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 126(1), pages 381-437.
    9. Amil Petrin, 2002. "Quantifying the Benefits of New Products: The Case of the Minivan," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 110(4), pages 705-729, August.
    10. Anna E. Tuchman, 2019. "Advertising and Demand for Addictive Goods: The Effects of E-Cigarette Advertising," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(6), pages 994-1022, November.
    11. Berry, Steven & Levinsohn, James & Pakes, Ariel, 1995. "Automobile Prices in Market Equilibrium," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 63(4), pages 841-890, July.
    12. Bagwell, Kyle, 2007. "The Economic Analysis of Advertising," Handbook of Industrial Organization, in: Mark Armstrong & Robert Porter (ed.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 28, pages 1701-1844, Elsevier.
    13. Randall A. Lewis & Justin M. Rao, 2015. "The Unfavorable Economics of Measuring the Returns to Advertising," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 130(4), pages 1941-1973.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bradley Shapiro & Günter J. Hitsch & Anna Tuchman, 2020. "Generalizable and Robust TV Advertising Effects," NBER Working Papers 27684, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Bradley Shapiro & Günter J. Hitsch & Anna Tuchman, 2020. "Generalizable and Robust TV Advertising Effects," Working Papers 2020-111, Becker Friedman Institute for Research In Economics.
    3. Naoki Aizawa & You Suk Kim, 2020. "Public and Private Provision of Information in Market-Based Public Programs: Evidence from Advertising in Health Insurance Marketplaces," NBER Working Papers 27695, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Bart J. Bronnenberg & Jean-Pierre Dubé & Chad Syverson, 2022. "Marketing Investment and Intangible Brand Capital," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 36(3), pages 53-74, Summer.
    5. Suppliet, Moritz, 2020. "Umbrella branding in pharmaceutical markets," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    6. Bradley T. Shapiro, 2020. "Advertising in Health Insurance Markets," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(3), pages 587-611, May.
    7. Brett R Gordon & Kinshuk Jerath & Zsolt Katona & Sridhar Narayanan & Jiwoong Shin & Kenneth C Wilbur, 2019. "Inefficiencies in Digital Advertising Markets," Papers 1912.09012, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2020.
    8. Rex Yuxing Du & Mingyu Joo & Kenneth C. Wilbur, 2019. "Advertising and brand attitudes: Evidence from 575 brands over five years," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 257-323, September.
    9. Gaynor, Martin & Town, Robert J., 2011. "Competition in Health Care Markets," Handbook of Health Economics, in: Mark V. Pauly & Thomas G. Mcguire & Pedro P. Barros (ed.), Handbook of Health Economics, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 499-637, Elsevier.
    10. Belleflamme,Paul & Peitz,Martin, 2015. "Industrial Organization," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107069978, August.
    11. Berman, Ron & Heller, Yuval, 2025. "Naive analytics: The strategic advantage of algorithmic heuristics," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 62-78.
    12. Rahman, Rajib, 2025. "Firms’ Advertising Strategies and Effectiveness of Traditional Advertising under Sugar Sweetened Beverage (SSB) Tax Policy," 2025 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2025, Denver, CO 360968, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    13. Randall Lewis & Dan Nguyen, 2015. "Display advertising’s competitive spillovers to consumer search," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 93-115, June.
    14. Friberg, Richard & Romahn, André, 2015. "Divestiture requirements as a tool for competition policy: A case from the Swedish beer market," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 1-18.
    15. Lam, Chungsang Tom & Liu, Meng & Hui, Xiang, 2021. "The geography of ridesharing: A case study on New York City," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    16. Steven T. Berry & Philip A. Haile, 2024. "Nonparametric Identification of Differentiated Products Demand Using Micro Data," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 92(4), pages 1135-1162, July.
    17. Wang, Ao, 2023. "Sieve BLP: A semi-nonparametric model of demand for differentiated products," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 325-351.
    18. Yin, Nina, 2023. "Pharmaceuticals, incremental innovation and market exclusivity," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    19. Ali Goli & Simha Mummalaneni & Pradeep K. Chintagunta & Sanjay K. Dhar, 2022. "Show and Sell: Studying the Effects of Branded Cigarette Product Placement in TV Shows on Cigarette Sales," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(6), pages 1163-1180, November.
    20. David P. Byrne & Susumu Imai & Vasilis Sarafidis & Masayuki Hirukawa, 2015. "Instrument-free Identification and Estimation of Differentiated Products Models," Working Paper Series 26, Economics Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:emetrp:v:89:y:2021:i:4:p:1855-1879. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/essssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.