IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v32y2025i6p8316-8337.html

Aligning Value Creation and Allocation Through Asymmetries Reduction: B Corps in the Spotlight

Author

Listed:
  • Beatrice Re
  • Grazia Garlatti Costa
  • Guido Bortoluzzi

Abstract

By following the classic logic of value creation, firms capture most of the value created with their stakeholders (economic, societal, and environmental) and generate asymmetries toward them. The new stakeholder theory emphasizes value creation at the firm‐stakeholder level and challenges this perspective by considering value creation and value allocation as closely interrelated. However, little is known about how firms may concretely improve the alignment of value creation and allocation in stakeholder systems. We address this research gap by conducting multiple case study research involving four firms and their key stakeholders. The chosen context of analysis lies in B Corps, i.e., firms holding the B Corp certification, which prove to meet high standards of social and environmental performance. Our findings contribute to new stakeholder theory by empirically illustrating how the value created through stakeholder collaboration is distributed among stakeholders through mechanisms that better align value creation and allocation. We advance a model that integrates institutionalized asymmetries and the mechanisms to reduce them and frames them into time and space dimensions.

Suggested Citation

  • Beatrice Re & Grazia Garlatti Costa & Guido Bortoluzzi, 2025. "Aligning Value Creation and Allocation Through Asymmetries Reduction: B Corps in the Spotlight," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(6), pages 8316-8337, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:6:p:8316-8337
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.70134
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70134
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.70134?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patrizia Gazzola & Daniele Grechi & Paola Ossola & Enrica Pavione, 2019. "Certified Benefit Corporations as a new way to make sustainable business: The Italian example," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(6), pages 1435-1445, November.
    2. Anita M. McGahan, 2023. "The New Stakeholder Theory on Organizational Purpose," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(2), pages 245-255, June.
    3. Roberto Garcia-Castro & Ruth V. Aguilera, 2015. "Incremental value creation and appropriation in a world with multiple stakeholders," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(1), pages 137-147, January.
    4. Charles W. L. Hill & Thomas M. Jones, 1992. "Stakeholder‐Agency Theory," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 131-154, March.
    5. Alexander Dahlsrud, 2008. "How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, January.
    6. Janine Hiller, 2013. "The Benefit Corporation and Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 118(2), pages 287-301, December.
    7. Angelo Arcuri & Lorenzo Giolli, 2022. "The relationship between upstream vertical integration and environmental sustainability in the luxury fashion industry," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(7), pages 1-20, July.
    8. Putrevu, Sanjay & McGuire, Jean & Siegel, Donald S. & Smith, David M., 2012. "Corporate social responsibility, irresponsibility, and corruption: Introduction to the special section," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(11), pages 1618-1621.
    9. Andrew L. Friedman & Samantha Miles, 2002. "Developing Stakeholder Theory," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(1), pages 1-21, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jose Luis Retolaza & Maite Ruiz & Leire San‐Jose, 2009. "CSR in business start‐ups: an application method for stakeholder engagement," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(6), pages 324-336, November.
    2. Sergiy D. Dmytriyev & R. Edward Freeman & Jacob Hörisch, 2021. "The Relationship between Stakeholder Theory and Corporate Social Responsibility: Differences, Similarities, and Implications for Social Issues in Management," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(6), pages 1441-1470, September.
    3. Luis Fonseca & Vitor Silva & José Carlos Sá & Vanda Lima & Gilberto Santos & Rui Silva, 2022. "B Corp versus ISO 9001 and 14001 certifications: Aligned, or alternative paths, towards sustainable development?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3), pages 496-508, May.
    4. Simone Pizzi & Fabio Caputo & Andrea Venturelli, 2020. "Does it pay to be an honest entrepreneur? Addressing the relationship between sustainable development and bankruptcy risk," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 1478-1486, May.
    5. Giorgia Nigri & Mara Del Baldo & Armando Agulini, 2020. "Governance and accountability models in Italian certified benefit corporations," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5), pages 2368-2380, September.
    6. Giorgio Mion & Cristian Rolando Loza Adaui & Angelo Bonfanti, 2021. "Characterizing the mission statements of benefit corporations: Empirical evidence from Italy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 2160-2172, May.
    7. Silvia Blasi & Silvia Rita Sedita, 2022. "Mapping the emergence of a new organisational form: An exploration of the intellectual structure of the B Corp research," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(1), pages 107-123, January.
    8. Kevin Levillain & Blanche Segrestin, 2019. "From primacy to purpose commitment: How emerging profit-with-purpose corporations open new corporate governance avenues," Post-Print hal-02290622, HAL.
    9. Silvia Cantele & Chiara Leardini & Luca Piubello Orsini, 2023. "Impactful B Corps: A configurational approach of organizational factors leading to high sustainability performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 1104-1120, May.
    10. Nandil Bhatia & Stephan Meier, 2026. "What Drives Employee Strategic Salience in Shareholder Communications? A Machine Learning Approach," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(2), pages 187-208, June.
    11. Tobias Gerwing & Peter Kajüter & Maximilian Wirth, 2022. "The role of sustainable corporate governance in mandatory sustainability reporting quality," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 92(3), pages 517-555, April.
    12. Harjoto, Maretno A. & Hoepner, Andreas G.F. & Li, Qian, 2022. "A stakeholder resource-based view of corporate social irresponsibility: Evidence from China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 830-843.
    13. Blanche Segrestin & Armand Hatchuel & Ken Starkey, 2019. "Captains Of Industry? Value Allocation And The Partnering Effect Of Managerial Discretion," Post-Print hal-02281514, HAL.
    14. Laura Ferraro & Franco Ernesto Rubino & Giovanna Crocco & Eleonora De Luca, 2026. "Benefit Corporations and B‐Corps: A State‐of‐the‐Art Review Through Bibliometric and Content Analyses," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(2), pages 1734-1754, April.
    15. Patrizia Gazzola & Daniele Grechi & Paola Ossola & Enrica Pavione, 2019. "Certified Benefit Corporations as a new way to make sustainable business: The Italian example," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(6), pages 1435-1445, November.
    16. Patrick Velte & Martin Stawinoga, 2020. "Do chief sustainability officers and CSR committees influence CSR-related outcomes? A structured literature review based on empirical-quantitative research findings," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 333-377, December.
    17. Julija Winschel & Martin Stawinoga, 2019. "Determinants and effects of sustainable CEO compensation: a structured literature review of empirical evidence," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 69(3), pages 265-328, September.
    18. Mauricio Andrés Latapí Agudelo & Lára Jóhannsdóttir & Brynhildur Davídsdóttir, 2019. "A literature review of the history and evolution of corporate social responsibility," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-23, December.
    19. Witold J. Henisz, 2023. "The Value of Organizational Purpose," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(2), pages 159-169, June.
    20. Anita M. McGahan & Leandro S. Pongeluppe, 2023. "There Is No Planet B: Aligning Stakeholder Interests to Preserve the Amazon Rainforest," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(12), pages 7860-7881, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:6:p:8316-8337. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.