IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/complx/v2022y2022i1n1889348.html

A New Quantitative Definition of the Complexity of Organized Matters

Author

Listed:
  • Tatsuaki Okamoto

Abstract

One of the most fundamental problems in science is to define the complexity of organized matters quantitatively, that is, organized complexity. Although many definitions have been proposed toward this aim in previous decades (e.g., logical depth, effective complexity, natural complexity, thermodynamics depth, effective measure complexity, and statistical complexity), there is no agreed‐upon definition. The major issue of these definitions is that they captured only a single feature among the three key features of complexity, descriptive, computational, and distributional features, for example, the effective complexity captured only the descriptive feature, the logical depth captured only the computational, and the statistical complexity captured only the distributional. In addition, some definitions were not computable; some were not rigorously specified; and any of them treated either probabilistic or deterministic forms of objects, but not both in a unified manner. This paper presents a new quantitative definition of organized complexity. In contrast to the existing definitions, this new definition simultaneously captures all of the three key features of complexity for the first time. In addition, the proposed definition is computable, is rigorously specified, and can treat both probabilistic and deterministic forms of objects in a unified manner or seamlessly. The proposed definition is based on circuits rather than Turing machines and ɛ‐machines. We give several criteria required for organized complexity definitions and show that the proposed definition satisfies all of them.

Suggested Citation

  • Tatsuaki Okamoto, 2022. "A New Quantitative Definition of the Complexity of Organized Matters," Complexity, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2022(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:complx:v:2022:y:2022:i:1:n:1889348
    DOI: 10.1155/2022/1889348
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1889348
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2022/1889348?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fernando Soler-Toscano & Hector Zenil & Jean-Paul Delahaye & Nicolas Gauvrit, 2014. "Calculating Kolmogorov Complexity from the Output Frequency Distributions of Small Turing Machines," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(5), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Jack W. Szostak, 2003. "Functional information: Molecular messages," Nature, Nature, vol. 423(6941), pages 689-689, June.
    3. Carla Sciarra & Guido Chiarotti & Luca Ridolfi & Francesco Laio, 2020. "Reconciling contrasting views on economic complexity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.
    4. Mikołaj Morzy & Tomasz Kajdanowicz & Przemysław Kazienko, 2017. "On Measuring the Complexity of Networks: Kolmogorov Complexity versus Entropy," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-12, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Balland, Pierre-Alexandre & Broekel, Tom & Diodato, Dario & Giuliani, Elisa & Hausmann, Ricardo & O'Clery, Neave & Rigby, David, 2022. "Reprint of The new paradigm of economic complexity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(8).
    2. Dingle, Kamaludin & Kamal, Rafiq & Hamzi, Boumediene, 2023. "A note on a priori forecasting and simplicity bias in time series," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 609(C).
    3. Quinten De Wettinck & Karolien De Bruyne & Wouter Bam & C'esar A. Hidalgo, 2025. "Economic Complexity Alignment and Sustainable Development," Papers 2509.17919, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2025.
    4. Hrishidev Unni & Rubal Rathi & Sangita Dutta Gupta & Anirban Chakraborti, 2025. "Analyzing the progress of Indian states chasing sustainable development goals using complex network framework," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 327-340, September.
    5. James McNerney & Yang Li & Andres Gomez-Lievano & Frank Neffke, 2025. "Bridging the short-term and long-term dynamics of economic structural change," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, December.
    6. Zhang, Lulu & Chen, Weiming & Zhang, Qian & You, Kairui & Diao, Gang, 2025. "Improving economic complexity index: Insights from value added," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1391-1408.
    7. DIODATO Dario, 2024. "Handbook of Economic Complexity for Policy," JRC Research Reports JRC138666, Joint Research Centre.
    8. Uribe, Jorge M., 2025. "Investment in intangible assets and economic complexity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(1).
    9. Koch, Philipp & Schwarzbauer, Wolfgang, 2021. "Yet another space: Why the Industry Space adds value to the understanding of structural change and economic development," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 198-213.
    10. Xiangjie Liu & Chengliang Liu & Junxian Piao, 2024. "Unpacking technology flows based on patent transactions: does trickle-down, proximity, and siphon help regional specialization?," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 73(1), pages 433-458, June.
    11. Simone Daniotti & Matté Hartog & Frank Neffke, 2025. "The coherence of US cities," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 122(37), pages 2501504122-, September.
    12. Benjamin Leroy & Davi Marim & El Ghali Benjelloun & Arthur Rozan Debeaurain & Jean-Michel Dalle, 2026. "The Geoeconomics of Venture Capital An Economic Complexity Approach to Emerging Technological Sovereignty," Papers 2604.09187, arXiv.org.
    13. Ye, Yucheng & Xu, Shuqi & Mariani, Manuel Sebastian & Lü, Linyuan, 2022. "Forecasting countries' gross domestic product from patent data," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    14. Frank Neffke & Angelica Sbardella & Ulrich Schetter & Andrea Tacchella, 2024. "Economic Complexity Analysis," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2430, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Oct 2024.
    15. George Adosoglou & Seonho Park & Gianfranco Lombardo & Stefano Cagnoni & Panos M. Pardalos, 2022. "Lazy Network: A Word Embedding‐Based Temporal Financial Network to Avoid Economic Shocks in Asset Pricing Models," Complexity, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2022(1).
    16. Nutarelli, Federico & Edet, Samuel & Gnecco, Giorgio & Riccaboni, Massimo, 2025. "Predicting the technological complexity of global cities based on unsupervised and supervised machine learning methods," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    17. Saima Shadab & Firoz Alam, 2024. "High-Technology Exports, Foreign Direct Investment, Renewable Energy Consumption and Economic Growth: Evidence from the United Arab Emirates," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(2), pages 394-401, March.
    18. Stojkoski, Viktor & Hidalgo, César A., 2026. "Optimizing economic complexity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(4).
    19. Christian Chacua & Matte Hartog, 2026. "Complexity: Hausmann-Hidalgo Economic Complexity," Growth Lab Working Papers 270, Harvard's Growth Lab.
    20. Behrooz Shahmoradi & Nejla Ould Daoud Ellili, 2024. "Bibliometric review of research on economic complexity: current trends, developments, and future research directions," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 51(4), pages 859-891, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:complx:v:2022:y:2022:i:1:n:1889348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/8503 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.