IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tec/journl/v20y2021i1p612-626.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contribution of eye-tracking to the study on perception of the complexity

Author

Listed:
  • Ferman Hasan

    (Psychology Department, Faculty of Arts, Soran University)

Abstract

In studying the way human beings evaluate randomness and produce random objects, cognitive psychology showed that the mind finds it difficult to recognize true randomness as well as to produce it because it is influenced by numerous biases. Studying them can help to understand better the way it is structured. In parallel, mathematics showed that more random objects have a higher algorithmic complexity. Computing lately provided practical means to calculate the algorithmic complexity of objects of finite size and also produced new encounters between mathematics and cognitive psychology by allowing the latter to envision new models for the brain, inspired by algorithmic logic. In this context, our research applied eye-tracking techniques to the study of the perception of complexity. Forty subjects had to order images belonging to ten groups of four according to decreasing (perceived) complexity. The hypothesis was that images with the higher algorithmic complexity would be perceived as more complex as well and would cause longer fixation times. However, experimental results did not confirm these hypotheses as the correlation between algorithmic and perceived complexities was low, and the relation between complexity and fixation time was not linear but closer to an inverted “U†shaped curve. This may be due to contextual effects and to choose images with complexities too close to each other, as subjects found it difficult to order them as requested. Further experiments must then be carried out with conditions better controlled and modified parameters.

Suggested Citation

  • Ferman Hasan, 2021. "Contribution of eye-tracking to the study on perception of the complexity," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 20(1), pages 612-626, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:20:y:2021:i:1:p:612-626
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/3517/1334
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/3517
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fernando Soler-Toscano & Hector Zenil & Jean-Paul Delahaye & Nicolas Gauvrit, 2014. "Calculating Kolmogorov Complexity from the Output Frequency Distributions of Small Turing Machines," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(5), pages 1-18, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dingle, Kamaludin & Kamal, Rafiq & Hamzi, Boumediene, 2023. "A note on a priori forecasting and simplicity bias in time series," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 609(C).
    2. repec:thr:techub:10020:y:2021:i:1:p:612-626 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Fernando Soler-Toscano & Hector Zenil, 2017. "A Computable Measure of Algorithmic Probability by Finite Approximations with an Application to Integer Sequences," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-10, December.
    4. Maxwell Murialdo & Arturo Cifuentes, 2022. "Quantifying Value with Effective Complexity," Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, , vol. 34(1), pages 69-85, January.
    5. Mikołaj Morzy & Tomasz Kajdanowicz & Przemysław Kazienko, 2017. "On Measuring the Complexity of Networks: Kolmogorov Complexity versus Entropy," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-12, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Cognitive psychology; theory of complexity; randomness; visual perception; perceived complexity; eye-tracking;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:20:y:2021:i:1:p:612-626. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tasente Tanase (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.