IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/quageo/v37y2018i3p151-162n10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Participatory Mapping in Community Participation – Case Study of Jeseník, Czech Republic

Author

Listed:
  • Pánek Jiří

    (Department of Development and Environmental Studies, Palacký University Olomouc, Czech Republic)

Abstract

Community participation has entered the 21st century and the era of e-participation, e-government and e-planning. With the opportunity to use Public Participation Support Systems, Computer-Aided Web Interviews and crowdsourcing mapping platforms, citizens are equipped with the tools to have their voices heard. This paper presents a case study of the deployment of such an online mapping platform in Jeseník, Czech Republic. In total, 533 respondents took part in the online mapping survey, which included six spatial questions. Respondents marked 4,714 points and added 1,538 comments to these points. The main aim of the research was to find whether there were any significant differences in the answers from selected groups (age, gender, home location) of respondents. The results show largest differences in answers of various (below 20 and above 20 year) age groups. Nevertheless further statistical examination would be needed to confirm the visual comparison.

Suggested Citation

  • Pánek Jiří, 2018. "Participatory Mapping in Community Participation – Case Study of Jeseník, Czech Republic," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 37(3), pages 151-162, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:quageo:v:37:y:2018:i:3:p:151-162:n:10
    DOI: 10.2478/quageo-2018-0031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2018-0031
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/quageo-2018-0031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philip Salesses & Katja Schechtner & César A Hidalgo, 2013. "The Collaborative Image of The City: Mapping the Inequality of Urban Perception," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-12, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ioanna Arkoudi & Carlos Lima Azevedo & Francisco C. Pereira, 2021. "Combining Discrete Choice Models and Neural Networks through Embeddings: Formulation, Interpretability and Performance," Papers 2109.12042, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2021.
    2. Edward L. Glaeser & Scott Duke Kominers & Michael Luca & Nikhil Naik, 2018. "Big Data And Big Cities: The Promises And Limitations Of Improved Measures Of Urban Life," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 56(1), pages 114-137, January.
    3. Been, Vicki & Ellen, Ingrid Gould & Gedal, Michael & Glaeser, Edward & McCabe, Brian J., 2016. "Preserving history or restricting development? The heterogeneous effects of historic districts on local housing markets in New York City," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 16-30.
    4. Galdo, Virgilio & Li, Yue & Rama, Martin, 2021. "Identifying urban areas by combining human judgment and machine learning: An application to India," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    5. Cem Çağrı Dönmez & Abdulkadir Atalan, 2019. "Developing Statistical Optimization Models for Urban Competitiveness Index: Under the Boundaries of Econophysics Approach," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-11, November.
    6. Mohamed R Ibrahim & James Haworth & Tao Cheng, 2021. "URBAN-i: From urban scenes to mapping slums, transport modes, and pedestrians in cities using deep learning and computer vision," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(1), pages 76-93, January.
    7. Jian Gao & Tao Zhou, 2017. "Quantifying China's Regional Economic Complexity," Papers 1703.01292, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2017.
    8. Spyridon Spyratos & Demetris Stathakis, 2018. "Evaluating the services and facilities of European cities using crowdsourced place data," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 45(4), pages 733-750, July.
    9. Nikhil Naik & Scott Duke Kominers & Ramesh Raskar & Edward L. Glaeser & César A. Hidalgo, 2015. "Do People Shape Cities, or Do Cities Shape People? The Co-evolution of Physical, Social, and Economic Change in Five Major U.S. Cities," NBER Working Papers 21620, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Thomas Collins & Riccardo Di Clemente & Mario Gutiérrez-Roig & Federico Botta, 2024. "Spatiotemporal gender differences in urban vibrancy," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 51(7), pages 1430-1446, September.
    11. Zhaoya Gong & Qiwei Ma & Changcheng Kan & Qianyun Qi, 2019. "Classifying Street Spaces with Street View Images for a Spatial Indicator of Urban Functions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-17, November.
    12. Hae Young Yun & Hyun-ah Kwon, 2023. "Neighborhood Identity Formation and the Changes in an Urban Regeneration Neighborhood in Gwangju, Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-27, July.
    13. Xu, Jiwei & Liu, Yaolin & Liu, Yanfang & An, Rui & Tong, Zhaomin, 2023. "Integrating street view images and deep learning to explore the association between human perceptions of the built environment and cardiovascular disease in older adults," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 338(C).
    14. Tomás Cox & Ricardo Hurtubia, 2021. "Latent Segmentation of Urban Space through Residential Location Choice," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 199-228, March.
    15. Zinchenko Olha, 2018. "Development of mechanism for formation and activation of territorial image potential," Technology audit and production reserves, 4(42) 2018, Socionet;Technology audit and production reserves, vol. 4(5), pages 4-10.
    16. Zijiao Zhang & Kangfu Zhuo & Wenhan Wei & Fu Li & Jie Yin & Liyan Xu, 2021. "Emotional Responses to the Visual Patterns of Urban Streets: Evidence from Physiological and Subjective Indicators," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-20, September.
    17. Buil-Gil, David & Solymosi, Reka & Moretti, Angelo, 2019. "Non-parametric bootstrap and small area estimation to mitigate bias in crowdsourced data. Simulation study and application to perceived safety," SocArXiv 8hgjt_v1, Center for Open Science.
    18. Justin B Hollander & Giorgi Nikolaishvili & Alphonsus A Adu-Bredu & Minyu Situ & Shabnam Bista, 2021. "Using deep learning to examine the correlation between transportation planning and perceived safety of the built environment," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(7), pages 2023-2038, September.
    19. Zhang, Yonglin & Li, Shanlin & Dong, Rencai & Deng, Hongbing & Fu, Xiao & Wang, Chenxing & Yu, Tianshu & Jia, Tianxia & Zhao, Jingzhu, 2021. "Quantifying physical and psychological perceptions of urban scenes using deep learning," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    20. Buil-Gil, David & Solymosi, Reka, 2020. "Using Crowdsourced Data to Study Crime and Place," SocArXiv 9ntk6, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:quageo:v:37:y:2018:i:3:p:151-162:n:10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.