IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/poicbe/v17y2023i1p1909-1918n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Innovative Future through Robotic Process Automation, a Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Bichel Andreea Nicoleta

    (1 Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Șerban Corina Georgiana

    (2 Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Bujor Dragoș

    (3 Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Artificial intelligence and robotic process automation are among the next generation of digital technologies that are transforming the workplace and our daily lives. And digital transformation has become a critical strategy for many businesses and their leadership. In today's fast-paced and ever-changing business environment, the cornerstone of organizational success is innovation. As the business environment is in perpetual modification and development, it requires businesses to be adaptive to both external and internal factors. The instability of the organizational environment increases the necessity and benefits of employee innovation. The authors analyze the extensive literature defining artificial intelligence, focusing on automation and specifically the role robotic process automation has in increasing organizational efficiency, reducing cost, and ensuring quality. In expanding on the scientific literature surrounding robotic process automation, the article analyses a case study of a Romanian tech company whose complex internal technology ecosystem has resulted in a disconnected landscape which required constant multi-system manual intervention in order to ensure process and data cohesion. The authors present the company’s response to the increased consumption of human capital on repetitive tasks that were increasingly subject to errors, in the form of robotic process automation and levels of machine learning and artificial intelligence. In following the progress of the company towards adopting robotic process automation to increase efficiency, speed, accuracy, and security of processes and tasks, the authors identify the benefits of directing human labor towards more meaningful activities and allowing the repetitive tasks to be shifted to robotic labor. The authors followed the progress of a service technology solutions organization that has established an IT intelligent operation ecosystem, with new strategies across various key departments such as finance, human resources, and Internal Audit, followed by their leadership perspective and thinking for the company's next steps in this case study.

Suggested Citation

  • Bichel Andreea Nicoleta & Șerban Corina Georgiana & Bujor Dragoș, 2023. "An Innovative Future through Robotic Process Automation, a Case Study," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 1909-1918, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:17:y:2023:i:1:p:1909-1918:n:4
    DOI: 10.2478/picbe-2023-0168
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2023-0168
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/picbe-2023-0168?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Montani, Francesco & Courcy, François & Vandenberghe, Christian, 2017. "Innovating under stress: The role of commitment and leader-member exchange," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 1-13.
    2. Ebersberger, Bernd & Kuckertz, Andreas, 2021. "Hop to it! The impact of organization type on innovation response time to the COVID-19 crisis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 126-135.
    3. Lukoschek, Carmen Sabrina & Gerlach, Gisela & Stock, Ruth Maria & Xin, Katherine, 2018. "Leading to sustainable organizational unit performance: Antecedents and outcomes of executives' dual innovation leadership," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 266-276.
    4. Lukoschek, Carmen Sabrina & Gerlach, Gisela & Stock, Ruth & Xin, Katherine, 2018. "Leading to Sustainable Organizational Unit Performance: Antecedents and Outcomes of Executives' Dual Innovation Leadership," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 110833, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    5. Lee, Sang M. & Trimi, Silvana, 2021. "Convergence innovation in the digital age and in the COVID-19 pandemic crisis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 14-22.
    6. Francesco Montani & François Courcy & Christian Vandenberghe, 2017. "Innovating under stress: The role of commitment and leader-member exchange," Post-Print hal-02078956, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Corina Georgiana ?ERBAN (PATRINTAS) & Andreea-Nicoleta BICHEL & Denisa ?ARANU & Drago? BUJOR, 2023. "Covid-19 Crisis Impact on Leadership: Innovation, Digitalization and CSR Dimensions," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 24(1), pages 78-91, March.
    2. Ali Zackery & Joseph Amankwah-Amoah & Zahra Heidari Darani & Shiva Ghasemi, 2022. "COVID-19 Research in Business and Management: A Review and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-32, August.
    3. Shin, Nina & Park, Sangwook, 2021. "Supply chain leadership driven strategic resilience capabilities management: A leader-member exchange perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 1-13.
    4. Salas-Vallina, Andrés & Simone, Cristina & Fernández-Guerrero, Rafael, 2020. "The human side of leadership: Inspirational leadership effects on follower characteristics and happiness at work (HAW)," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 162-171.
    5. Mai Chi Vu & Roger Gill, 2023. "Are Leaders Responsible for Meaningful Work? Perspectives from Buddhist-Enacted Leaders and Buddhist Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 187(2), pages 347-370, October.
    6. Lin, Hao-Chieh & Lin, Pei-Chun, 2019. "The interplay between CEO-TMT exchange level and differentiation: Implications for firm competitive behaviors and performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 171-181.
    7. Chowdhury, Soumyadeb & Dey, Prasanta Kumar & Rodríguez-Espíndola, Oscar & Parkes, Geoff & Tuyet, Nguyen Thi Anh & Long, Dang Duc & Ha, Tran Phuong, 2022. "Impact of Organisational Factors on the Circular Economy Practices and Sustainable Performance of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises in Vietnam," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 362-378.
    8. Tiberiu Foris & Alina Simona Tecău & Camelia-Cristina Dragomir & Diana Foris, 2022. "The Start-Up Manager in Times of Crisis: Challenges and Solutions for Increasing the Resilience of Companies and Sustainable Reconstruction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-20, July.
    9. Tseng, Ming-Lang & Bui, Tat-Dat & Lim, Ming K. & Fujii, Minoru & Mishra, Umakanta, 2022. "Assessing data-driven sustainable supply chain management indicators for the textile industry under industrial disruption and ambidexterity," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    10. Handong Tang & Ge Wang & Junwei Zheng & Lan Luo & Guangdong Wu, 2020. "How Does the Emotional Intelligence of Project Managers Affect Employees’ Innovative Behaviors and Job Performance? The Moderating Role of Social Network Structure Hole," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, October.
    11. Dukangqi Li & Weitao Shen, 2022. "Regional Happiness and Corporate Green Innovation: A Financing Constraints Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-25, February.
    12. Sakellariou, Evy & Karantinou, Kalipso & Goffin, Keith, 2021. "Video-ethnography during Covid-19 and beyond: Generating user foresights in a virtual world," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    13. AlNuaimi, Bader K. & Singh, Sanjay Kumar & Harney, Brian, 2021. "Unpacking the role of innovation capability: Exploring the impact of leadership style on green procurement via a natural resource-based perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 78-88.
    14. Cugno, Monica & Castagnoli, Rebecca & Büchi, Giacomo & Pini, Marco, 2022. "Industry 4.0 and production recovery in the covid era," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    15. Eleftherios Soleas, 2021. "Environmental factors impacting the motivation to innovate: a systematic review," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, December.
    16. Yuan Ni & Jia Wang & Cui Li, 2022. "The Power of Sustainability in the “Black Swan” Event: Entrepreneurial Cognition of Top Management Team and Dual Business Model Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-22, March.
    17. Simeoni, Francesca & Brunetti, Federico & Mion, Giorgio & Baratta, Rossella, 2020. "Ambidextrous organizations for sustainable development: The case of fair-trade systems," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 549-560.
    18. Leif Brändle & Helen Signer & Andreas Kuckertz, 2023. "Socioeconomic status and entrepreneurial networking responses to the COVID-19 crisis," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(1), pages 111-147, January.
    19. Adomako, Samuel & Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph & Donbesuur, Francis & Ahsan, Mujtaba & Danso, Albert & Uddin, Moshfique, 2022. "Strategic agility of SMEs in emerging economies: Antecedents, consequences and boundary conditions," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(6).
    20. Hana Urbancová & Pavla Vrabcová, 2023. "Sustainability-oriented Innovation: Crucial Sources to Achieve Competitiveness," Journal of Economics / Ekonomicky casopis, Institute of Economic Research, Slovak Academy of Sciences, vol. 71(1), pages 46-64, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:17:y:2023:i:1:p:1909-1918:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.