IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/otamic/v12y2020i1p2083-2094n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Qualitative analysis of Request For Information to identify design flaws in steel construction projects

Author

Listed:
  • Fokwa Soh Mathieu

    (École de technologie supérieure, 1100 Rue Notre-Dame Ouest, Montréal, QC H3C 1K3Québec, Canada, Tel : +1 (514) 396-8800)

  • Barbeau Daniel

    (Groupe CANAM, 270, chemin Du Tremblay Boucherville, J4B 5X9Québec, Canada, Tel : +1 866-506-4000)

  • Doré Sylvie

    (École de technologie supérieure, 1100 Rue Notre-Dame Ouest, Montréal, QC H3C 1K3Québec, Canada, Tel : +1 (514) 396-8800)

  • Forgues Daniel

    (École de technologie supérieure, 1100 Rue Notre-Dame Ouest, Montréal, QC H3C 1K3Québec, Canada, Tel : +1 (514) 396-8800)

Abstract

Request for information (RFI) is a formal process used in the Architecture, Engineering and Construction industry to address design flaws that affect communication between designers and contractors. A large number of RFIs are a sign of a lack of precision or coordination in the design documents. However, RFIs produce rich, precise, and structured information. Analyzing their content can help to identify recurring problems between designers and construction teams and better tailor future projects to the working context of the contractors. This article presents a method for identifying recurring issues during the design phase of steel construction projects through the analysis of the contents of RFIs. It is original in using a qualitative content analysis tool that can analyze large quantities of RFIs rapidly. Identifying the recurrent problems of contractors will allow the establishment of rules to be taken into consideration during the design phase of future steel construction projects. A case study of 26 steel construction projects demonstrates the feasibility of this method. This case study shows that, given the same designers and construction teams, recurring problems shown in RFIs do not differ according to the scale of the projects. In this case, the main issue between designers and contractors is the lack and inadequate presentation of information related to the connection of steel components. Identifying these problems can pave the way for initiatives to improve the design phase and can be an essential step in making contractors’ knowledge available to designers early in the projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Fokwa Soh Mathieu & Barbeau Daniel & Doré Sylvie & Forgues Daniel, 2020. "Qualitative analysis of Request For Information to identify design flaws in steel construction projects," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 2083-2094, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:otamic:v:12:y:2020:i:1:p:2083-2094:n:5
    DOI: 10.2478/otmcj-2020-0005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/otmcj-2020-0005
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/otmcj-2020-0005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. WoonSeong Jeong & Soowon Chang & JeongWook Son & June-Seong Yi, 2016. "BIM-Integrated Construction Operation Simulation for Just-In-Time Production Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-25, October.
    2. Donald McTavish & Ellen Pirro, 1990. "Contextual content analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 245-265, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zezhou Wu & Changhong Chen & Yuzhu Cai & Chen Lu & Hao Wang & Tao Yu, 2019. "BIM-Based Visualization Research in the Construction Industry: A Network Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-13, September.
    2. Murat Gunduz & Ayman Fahmi Naser, 2017. "Cost Based Value Stream Mapping as a Sustainable Construction Tool for Underground Pipeline Construction Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-20, November.
    3. Borna Dasović & Mario Galić & Uroš Klanšek, 2020. "A Survey on Integration of Optimization and Project Management Tools for Sustainable Construction Scheduling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, April.
    4. Ana Jiménez-Rivero & Ana De Guzmán-Báez & Justo García-Navarro, 2017. "Enhanced On-Site Waste Management of Plasterboard in Construction Works: A Case Study in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-12, March.
    5. Chen, Chi-Ying & Chang, Shao-Liang, 2017. "SNS Vs App campaigning: Candidateʼs self-presentation on Facebook and LINE in a mixed-gender election," 14th ITS Asia-Pacific Regional Conference, Kyoto 2017: Mapping ICT into Transformation for the Next Information Society 168478, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    6. Cristian Carini & Laura Rocca & Monica Veneziani & Claudio Teodori, 2021. "Sustainability regulation and global corporate citizenship: A lesson (already) learned?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 116-126, January.
    7. Saergi Valera & Jaon Guàrdia & Enric Pol, 1998. "A Study of the Symbolic Aspects of Space Using Nonquantitative Techniques of Analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 367-381, November.
    8. Wenzhu Liao & Tong Wang, 2018. "Promoting Green and Sustainability: A Multi-Objective Optimization Method for the Job-Shop Scheduling Problem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, November.
    9. Wang, Peng & Yang, Muyi & Mamaril, Kristy & Shi, Xunpeng & Cheng, Beibei & Zhao, Daiqing, 2021. "Explaining the slow progress of coal phase-out: The case of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Region," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    10. Melina Alexa & Cornelia Zuell, 2000. "Text Analysis Software: Commonalities, Differences and Limitations: The Results of a Review," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 299-321, August.
    11. Rodrigo F. Herrera & M. Amalia Sanz & Laura Montalbán-Domingo & Tatiana García-Segura & Eugenio Pellicer, 2019. "Impact of Game-Based Learning on Understanding Lean Construction Principles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-16, September.
    12. Magnani, Giovanna & Zucchella, Antonella & Strange, Roger, 2019. "The dynamics of outsourcing relationships in global value chains: Perspectives from MNEs and their suppliers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 581-595.
    13. Samad M. E. Sepasgozar & Felix Kin Peng Hui & Sara Shirowzhan & Mona Foroozanfar & Liming Yang & Lu Aye, 2020. "Lean Practices Using Building Information Modeling (BIM) and Digital Twinning for Sustainable Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-22, December.
    14. Paul, June C., 2020. "Exploring support for LGBTQ youth transitioning from foster care to emerging adulthood," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    15. Pedro Veiga & Luis Mendes & Luis Lourenço, 2016. "A retrospective view of statistical quality control research and identification of emerging trends: a bibliometric analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 673-692, March.
    16. Adrieli Cristina Vieira De Carvalho & Ariovaldo Denis Granja & Vanessa Gomes Da Silva, 2017. "A Systematic Literature Review on Integrative Lean and Sustainability Synergies over a Building’s Lifecycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-18, July.
    17. Isabel Jordan-Palomar & Patricia Tzortzopoulos & Jorge García-Valldecabres & Eugenio Pellicer, 2018. "Protocol to Manage Heritage-Building Interventions Using Heritage Building Information Modelling (HBIM)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, March.
    18. Sarker, Pradip Kumar & Fischer, Richard & Tamayo, Fabian & Navarrete, Bolier Torres & Günter, Sven, 2022. "Analyzing forest policy mixes based on the coherence of policies and the consistency of legislative policy instruments: A case study from Ecuador," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    19. Mohammadsoroush Tafazzoli & Ehsan Mousavi & Sharareh Kermanshachi, 2020. "Opportunities and Challenges of Green-Lean: An Integrated System for Sustainable Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-12, May.
    20. Arandas, Mohammed Fadel, 2019. "Malaysian Media Coverage of Palestinian Presidents’ Image during Crises 1996-2016," SocArXiv kbcr4, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:otamic:v:12:y:2020:i:1:p:2083-2094:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.