IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/foeste/v25y2025i1p240-258n1012.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Nexus of Robotic Advisory, Digital Fluency, and Financial Literacy in the Future Investment Landscape – A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Pattnaik Sonali

    (KIIT Deemed to be University, India Department of Commerce)

  • Hota Sweta Leena

    (KIIT Deemed to be University, India Department of Commerce)

Abstract

Research background The emergence of financial technology, namely robo-advice (RA), has transformed wealth management by increasing accessibility to customized financial guidance, extending beyond the realm of affluent individuals. Robo-advisors, changing the financial advice sector, use artificial intelligence and algorithms to provide customized portfolio recommendations that align with investors’ risk tolerance and investment objectives. Purpose This paper explores the complex relationships between financial literacy, robo-advisory services, and digital fluency. These relationships are essential for comprehending investing behaviours within a quickly changing digital ecosystem. Research methodology This study employs a systematic review methodology to investigate the interplay between robotic advisory, digital fluency, and financial literacy. Using a SWOT analysis, we contrast the benefits and downsides of robo-advisers with traditional financial advisors, illuminating the potentially revolutionary nature of RA. Results The Indian robo-advisory industry is promising but there are still obstacles to overcome, including security issues and governmental oversight. Global robo-advisory platforms are still developing, but India’s growth trajectory is unique because of changes in regulations and the country’s acceptance of digital technology. Despite regulatory and literacy issues, the robo-advisory market in India is expected to grow to a value of US$25.74 billion by 2027 (Ken Research, 2022), indicating market potential (Singh, 2023). While this is in line with general trends, it also draws attention to particular issues such a lack of financial literacy, cautious investor sentiment, and a preference for traditional advisors (Singh, 2023; Bhattacharyya, Bhattacharyya, 2022). Novelty The study offers a novel viewpoint on the expanding robo-advisory services industry, especially in light of digital fluency and financial literacy. Although robo-advisors have been the subject of earlier research, this work fills a gap in the literature by highlighting the significance of digital fluency and financial literacy.

Suggested Citation

  • Pattnaik Sonali & Hota Sweta Leena, 2025. "Exploring the Nexus of Robotic Advisory, Digital Fluency, and Financial Literacy in the Future Investment Landscape – A Systematic Review," Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, Sciendo, vol. 25(1), pages 240-258.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:foeste:v:25:y:2025:i:1:p:240-258:n:1012
    DOI: 10.2478/foli-2025-0012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/foli-2025-0012
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/foli-2025-0012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Teodoro Cocca, 2016. "Potential and Limitations of Virtual Advice in Wealth Management," Journal of Financial Transformation, Capco Institute, vol. 44, pages 45-57.
    2. Francesco D’Acunto & Nagpurnanand Prabhala & Alberto G Rossi, 2019. "The Promises and Pitfalls of Robo-Advising," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 32(5), pages 1983-2020.
    3. Lusardi, Annamaria & Mitchell, Olivia S., 2007. "Baby Boomer retirement security: The roles of planning, financial literacy, and housing wealth," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 205-224, January.
    4. Peter Gomber & Jascha-Alexander Koch & Michael Siering, 2017. "Digital Finance and FinTech: current research and future research directions," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(5), pages 537-580, July.
    5. Shanmuganathan, Manchuna, 2020. "Behavioural finance in an era of artificial intelligence: Longitudinal case study of robo-advisors in investment decisions," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 27(C).
    6. Libby, Robert & Bloomfield, Robert & Nelson, Mark W., 2002. "Experimental research in financial accounting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 27(8), pages 775-810, November.
    7. Roman Inderst & Marco Ottaviani, 2009. "Misselling through Agents," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 99(3), pages 883-908, June.
    8. Christian Hildebrand & Anouk Bergner, 2021. "Conversational robo advisors as surrogates of trust: onboarding experience, firm perception, and consumer financial decision making," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 659-676, July.
    9. Angela Hung & Andrew Parker & Joanne K. Yoong, 2009. "Defining and Measuring Financial Literacy," Working Papers 708, RAND Corporation.
    10. Angela A. Hung & Andrew M. Parker & Joanne K. Yoong, 2009. "Defining and Measuring Financial Literacy," Working Papers WR-708, RAND Corporation.
    11. Juan Carlos Lopez & Sinisa Babcic & Andres De La Ossa, 2015. "Advice goes virtual:how new digital investment services are changing the wealth management landscape," Journal of Financial Perspectives, EY Global FS Institute, vol. 3(3), pages 156-164.
    12. Stephen Foerster & Juhani T. Linnainmaa & Brian T. Melzer & Alessandro Previtero, 2017. "Retail Financial Advice: Does One Size Fit All?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 72(4), pages 1441-1482, August.
    13. Sondra G. Beverly & Marianne A. Hilgert & Jeanne M. Hogarth, 2003. "Household financial management: the connection between knowledge and behavior," Federal Reserve Bulletin, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.), issue Jul, pages 309-322.
    14. Andreas Oehler & Matthias Horn & Stefan Wendt, 2022. "Investor Characteristics and their Impact on the Decision to use a Robo-advisor," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 62(1), pages 91-125, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oscar A. Stolper & Andreas Walter, 2017. "Financial literacy, financial advice, and financial behavior," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(5), pages 581-643, July.
    2. Tabea Bucher-Koenen & Annamaria Lusardi & Rob Alessie & Maarten van Rooij, 2017. "How Financially Literate Are Women? An Overview and New Insights," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(2), pages 255-283, July.
    3. Rodrigues, Luís Filipe & Oliveira, Abílio & Rodrigues, Helena & Costa, Carlos J., 2019. "Assessing consumer literacy on financial complex products," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 93-104.
    4. Calcagno, Riccardo & Monticone, Chiara, 2015. "Financial literacy and the demand for financial advice," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 363-380.
    5. M. M. Naeser Seldal & Ellen K. Nyhus, 2022. "Financial Vulnerability, Financial Literacy, and the Use of Digital Payment Technologies," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 281-306, June.
    6. Andrzej Cwynar & Wiktor Cwynar & Monika Baryła-Matejczuk & Moises Betancort, 2019. "Sustainable Debt Behaviour and Well-Being of Young Adults: The Role of Parental Financial Socialisation Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-26, December.
    7. Elizabeth Lyon & J. R. Catlin, 2020. "Consumer Misconceptions about Tax Laws: Results from a Survey in the United States," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 807-828, December.
    8. Zhong Chu & Zhengwei Wang & Jing Jian Xiao & Weiqiang Zhang, 2017. "Financial Literacy, Portfolio Choice and Financial Well-Being," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 132(2), pages 799-820, June.
    9. Oehler, Andreas & Horn, Matthias, 2024. "Does ChatGPT provide better advice than robo-advisors?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    10. Sprenger, Julia, 2016. "Explanations or advice: The impact of financial literacy on information acquisition behavior," Ruhr Economic Papers 626, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    11. Hyesun Hwang & Hyung In Park, 2023. "The relationships of financial literacy with both financial behavior and financial well‐being: Meta‐analyses based on the selective literature review," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(1), pages 222-244, January.
    12. Ziyuan Lyu & Li Wei, 2021. "Information sources and participation in the Chinese insurance market: knowledge as a mediator," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 46(1), pages 79-106, January.
    13. Alexia GAUDEUL & Caterina GIANNETTI, 2023. "Trade-offs in the design of financial algorithms," Discussion Papers 2023/288, Dipartimento di Economia e Management (DEM), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
    14. J. C. Hauff & A. Carlander & T. Gärling & G. Nicolini, 2020. "Retirement Financial Behaviour: How Important Is Being Financially Literate?," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 543-564, September.
    15. Cordero, José Manuel & Gil, María & Pedraja Chaparro, Francisco, 2016. "Exploring the effect of financial literacy courses on student achievement: a cross-country approach using PISA 2012 data," MPRA Paper 75474, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Cardillo, Giovanni & Chiappini, Helen, 2024. "Robo-advisors: A systematic literature review," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PA).
    17. Chauhan, Yogesh & Dey, Dipanjan Kumar, 2020. "Does financial literacy affect the value of financial advice? A contingent valuation approach," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 25(C).
    18. Alfonso Arellano & Noelia Camara & David Tuesta, 2014. "El efecto de la autoconfianza en el conocimiento financiero," Working Papers 1427, BBVA Bank, Economic Research Department.
    19. Béres, Dániel & Huzdik, Katalin, 2012. "Financial Literacy and Macro-economics," Public Finance Quarterly, Corvinus University of Budapest, vol. 57(3), pages 298-312.
    20. Delis, Manthos & Galariotis, Emilios & Monne, Jerome, 2021. "Financial vulnerability and seeking expert advice: Evidence from a survey experiment," MPRA Paper 107095, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:foeste:v:25:y:2025:i:1:p:240-258:n:1012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.