IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/ejothr/v15y2025i2p196-207n1002.html

The importance and maintenance of the Clean & Safe seal in the travel decision-making of residents in Portugal in the post-COVID-19-pandemic period

Author

Listed:
  • Lopes Maria Carlos

    (CiTUR Centre for Tourism Research, Development and Innovation, Funchal)

  • Dinis Gorete

    (GOVCOPP - Unidade de Investigação em Governança Competitividade e Políticas Públicas: Aveiro, Aveiro)

Abstract

This study analyses the impact of the Clean & Safe Seal — implemented by Turismo de Portugal — on Portuguese tourists’ travel decisions in two post-pandemic periods, using 370 questionnaires: 207 administered between December 2021 and January 2022, and 163 between December 2022 and February 2023. In the first time interval, the perception of risk was decisive, with the Clean & Safe Seal strongly influencing choices made due to hygiene considerations. In the second time interval, the seal’s influence decreased significantly, as did concern for its maintenance. There was a greater preference for rural and local accommodation in the first period — two to three times higher than in the second. Young people predominated amongst the respondents, limiting the age representation despite the otherwise robust sample. The study’s quantitative method excluded subjective questions, suggesting that future studies could include open-ended interviews to explore tourists’ needs and frustrations. Tourism managers and businesses should study risk perception to make informed decisions and avoid unnecessary costs. This is the first study to compare the influence of the Clean & Safe Seal at two different points in time, highlighting how risk perception affects tourist behaviour.

Suggested Citation

  • Lopes Maria Carlos & Dinis Gorete, 2025. "The importance and maintenance of the Clean & Safe seal in the travel decision-making of residents in Portugal in the post-COVID-19-pandemic period," European Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Recreation, Sciendo, vol. 15(2), pages 196-207.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:ejothr:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:196-207:n:1002
    DOI: 10.2478/ejthr-2025-0014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/ejthr-2025-0014
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/ejthr-2025-0014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Slovic & Baruch Fischhoff & Sarah Lichtenstein, 1982. "Why Study Risk Perception?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(2), pages 83-93, June.
    2. Adam, Issahaku, 2015. "Backpackers' risk perceptions and risk reduction strategies in Ghana," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 99-108.
    3. Maja Turnšek & Mitja Gorenak & Boštjan Brumen & Janez Mekinc & Marjetka Rangus & Tanja Lešnik Štuhec, 2020. "Perceived Threat of COVID-19 and Future Travel Avoidance: Results from an Early Convenient Sample in Slovenia," Academica Turistica - Tourism and Innovation Journal, University of Primorska Press, vol. 13(1), pages 3-19.
    4. Maja Turnšek & Mitja Gorenak & Boštjan Brumen & Janez Mekinc & Marjetka Rangus & Tanja Lešnik Štuhec, 2020. "Perceived Threat of COVID-19 and Future Travel Avoidance: Results from an Early Convenient Sample in Slovenia," Academica Turistica - Tourism and Innovation Journal, University of Primorska Press, vol. 13(1), pages 3-19.
    5. Thowayeb H. Hassan & Amany E. Salem, 2021. "The Importance of Safety and Security Measures at Sharm El Sheikh Airport and Their Impact on Travel Decisions after Restarting Aviation during the COVID-19 Outbreak," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thowayeb H. Hassan & Amany E. Salem, 2021. "The Importance of Safety and Security Measures at Sharm El Sheikh Airport and Their Impact on Travel Decisions after Restarting Aviation during the COVID-19 Outbreak," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, May.
    2. Sharon, Teitler Regev & Shahrabani, Shosh, 2021. "Health precautions while traveling after COVID-19," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 7, pages 68-73.
    3. Hélder da Silva Lopes & Paula C. Remoaldo & Vitor Ribeiro & Javier Martín-Vide, 2021. "Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Tourist Risk Perceptions—The Case Study of Porto," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-29, June.
    4. Marko Perić & Vanja Vitezić, 2021. "Tourism Getting Back to Life after COVID-19: Can Artificial Intelligence Help?," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-13, September.
    5. Ana Chersulich Tomino & Marko Periæ, 2022. "Sport-Tourism Running Events in the Post-COVID-19 World: Any Sign of Change?," Academica Turistica - Tourism and Innovation Journal, University of Primorska Press, vol. 15(1), pages 135-147.
    6. Wojciech Trzebiński & Radosław Baran & Beata Marciniak, 2021. "Did the COVID-19 Pandemic Make Consumers Shop Alone? The Role of Emotions and Interdependent Self-Construal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, June.
    7. Noveri Maulana & Rifelly Dewi Astuti & Hariyadi B. Sukamdani & Prijono Tjiptoherijanto, 2022. "Risk Perception in the Post COVID-19 Pandemic Era: An Analysis of Tourist Accommodation and Travel Behavior in the New Normal Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    8. Li, Jianping & Feng, Yuyao & Li, Guowen & Sun, Xiaolei, 2020. "Tourism companies' risk exposures on text disclosure," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    9. Garaus, Marion & Hudáková, Melánia, 2022. "The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on tourists’ air travel intentions: The role of perceived health risk and trust in the airline," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    10. Joanna Sokolowska & Patrycja Sleboda, 2015. "The Inverse Relation Between Risks and Benefits: The Role of Affect and Expertise," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(7), pages 1252-1267, July.
    11. Nathalie De Marcellis-Warin & Ingrid Peignier, 2022. "Baromètre de la confiance des consommateurs québécois à l’égard des aliments -1 re édition," CIRANO Project Reports 2020rp-39, CIRANO.
    12. Shi-jie Jiang & Feiyun Xiang & Iris Yang, 2023. "Effect of Prevention Focus on the Relationships Among Driving Accident History, Risk Perception, and Consumers’ Automobile Insurance Coverage Decisions," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, July.
    13. Lekfuangfu, Warn N., 2022. "Mortality risk, perception, and human capital investments: The legacy of landmines in Cambodia," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    14. Yingyu Zhang & Hui Luan & Wei Shao & Yingjun Xu, 2016. "Managerial risk preference and its influencing factors: analysis of large state-owned enterprises management personnel in China," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(2), pages 135-158, August.
    15. Minhong Kim & Kyu Ha Choi & Becca Leopkey, 2021. "The influence of tourist risk perceptions on travel intention to mega sporting event destinations with different levels of risk," Tourism Economics, , vol. 27(3), pages 419-435, May.
    16. Yacov Y. Haimes, 2012. "Systems‐Based Guiding Principles for Risk Modeling, Planning, Assessment, Management, and Communication," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(9), pages 1451-1467, September.
    17. Claya, Pablo Mac & Accursia, Federico M. & Harmath, Pedro, 2022. "Surviving as an Argentine Farmer: Factors that Influence Risk Management Strategies," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 13(04), December.
    18. Guofeng Ma & Yue Ding & Junyi Ma, 2022. "The Impact of Airport Physical Environment on Perceived Safety and Domestic Travel Intention of Chinese Passengers during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Mediating Role of Passenger Satisfaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, May.
    19. Laura K. Siebeneck & Thomas J. Cova, 2012. "Spatial and Temporal Variation in Evacuee Risk Perception Throughout the Evacuation and Return‐Entry Process," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(9), pages 1468-1480, September.
    20. Lin, Yi-Hsin & Wu, Hanjun & He, Hang & Tsui, Kan Wai Hong, 2023. "Changes in perceptions of airport services’ attributes: An assessment of the impacts of COVID-19," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 116-128.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:ejothr:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:196-207:n:1002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.