IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/buogeo/v44y2019i44p73-80n6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adaptive Development of a Regional Spatial Data Infrastructure Facing Local Prospects and Socio-Technological Trends

Author

Listed:
  • Kalliola Risto
  • Käyhkö Niina
  • Jokela Sanna

    (University of Turku, Department of Geography and Geology, FIN20014 Turku, Finland)

Abstract

The regional Lounaispaikka-SDI (Spatial Data Infrastructure) in south-west Finland is being developed by a dynamic assembly of the region’s geospatial expertise and its networking, spatial data and geoportal services. Emerging as a data-centric constellation that supported the region’s geographical information professionals, this assembly has developed into a geospatial service with more broadly-focused public information on the region. This development has had five adaptive phases, each as a response to changing local needs and fast-evolving trends in information and communication technologies. Alongside these processes, the Lounaispaikka-SDI has also reinforced the region’s geospatial competencies with benefits offered to academia, public sector institutions, and companies.

Suggested Citation

  • Kalliola Risto & Käyhkö Niina & Jokela Sanna, 2019. "Adaptive Development of a Regional Spatial Data Infrastructure Facing Local Prospects and Socio-Technological Trends," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 44(44), pages 73-80, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:buogeo:v:44:y:2019:i:44:p:73-80:n:6
    DOI: 10.2478/bog-2019-0016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/bog-2019-0016
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/bog-2019-0016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Strain, Lisa & Rajabifard, Abbas & Williamson, Ian, 2006. "Marine administration and spatial data infrastructure," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 431-441, July.
    2. Perkmann, Markus & Schildt, Henri, 2015. "Open data partnerships between firms and universities: The role of boundary organizations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(5), pages 1133-1143.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michele O’Dwyer & Raffaele Filieri & Lisa O’Malley, 2023. "Establishing successful university–industry collaborations: barriers and enablers deconstructed," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 900-931, June.
    2. Zakaria Babutsidze & Graham Bradley & Andreas Chai & Thomas Dietz, 2018. "Public perceptions and responses to climate change in France," Sciences Po publications info:hdl:2441/7vdd604d479, Sciences Po.
    3. Cooley, Savannah & Jenkins, Amber & Schaeffer, Blake & Bormann, Kat J. & Abdallah, Adel & Melton, Forrest & Granger, Stephanie & Graczyk, Indrani, 2022. "Paths to research-driven decision making in the realms of environment and water," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    4. Sintov, Nicole D. & Schuitema, Geertje, 2018. "Odd couple or perfect pair? Tensions and recommendations for social scientist-industry partnerships in energy research," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 247-251.
    5. Anna Jonsson & Maria Grafström & Mikael Klintman, 2022. "Unboxing knowledge in collaboration between academia and society: A story about conceptions and epistemic uncertainty [De-essentializing the Knowledge Intensive Firm: Reflections on Skeptical Resea," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 49(4), pages 583-597.
    6. Ogink, Ruben H.A.J. & Goossen, Martin C. & Romme, A. Georges L. & Akkermans, Henk, 2023. "Mechanisms in open innovation: A review and synthesis of the literature," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    7. Yuandi Wang & Ruifeng Hu & Weiping Li & Xiongfeng Pan, 2016. "Does teaching benefit from university–industry collaboration? Investigating the role of academic commercialization and engagement," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 106(3), pages 1037-1055, March.
    8. Dahlander, Linus & Gann, David M. & Wallin, Martin W., 2021. "How open is innovation? A retrospective and ideas forward," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(4).
    9. Gold, E. Richard, 2021. "The fall of the innovation empire and its possible rise through open science," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(5).
    10. Villani, Elisa & Rasmussen, Einar & Grimaldi, Rosa, 2017. "How intermediary organizations facilitate university–industry technology transfer: A proximity approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 86-102.
    11. Zakaria Babutsidze & Graham Bradley & A. B. Chai & Thomas Dietz, 2018. "Public perceptions and responses to climate change in France," Working Papers hal-03404214, HAL.
    12. Amalya L. Oliver, 2022. "Holistic ecosystems for enhancing innovative collaborations in university–industry consortia," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(5), pages 1612-1628, October.
    13. Kasia Zalewska-Kurek & Rainer Harms, 2020. "Managing autonomy in university–industry research: a case of collaborative Ph.D. projects in the Netherlands," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 393-416, April.
    14. Joshua Pearce, 2018. "Sponsored Libre Research Agreements to Create Free and Open Source Software and Hardware," Post-Print hal-02111369, HAL.
    15. Clune, Conor & O’Dwyer, Brendan, 2020. "Organizing dissonance through institutional work: The embedding of social and environmental accountability in an investment field," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    16. Zakaria Babutsidze, 2018. "Pirated Economics," South-Eastern Europe Journal of Economics, Association of Economic Universities of South and Eastern Europe and the Black Sea Region, vol. 16(2), pages 209-219.
    17. Diego Corrales-Garay & Eva-María Mora-Valentín & Marta Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado, 2019. "Open Data for Open Innovation: An Analysis of Literature Characteristics," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-25, March.
    18. Järvi, Kati & Almpanopoulou, Argyro & Ritala, Paavo, 2018. "Organization of knowledge ecosystems: Prefigurative and partial forms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(8), pages 1523-1537.
    19. Sultan Kocaman & Nadire Ozdemir, 2020. "Improvement of Disability Rights via Geographic Information Science," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-17, July.
    20. Cavallo, Angelo & Burgers, Henri & Ghezzi, Antonio & van de Vrande, Vareska, 2022. "The evolving nature of open innovation governance: A study of a digital platform development in collaboration with a big science centre," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:buogeo:v:44:y:2019:i:44:p:73-80:n:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.