IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jacres/doi10.1086-690942.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

She Said, She Said: Differential Interpersonal Similarities Predict Unique Linguistic Mimicry in Online Word of Mouth

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah G. Moore
  • Brent McFerran

Abstract

This research examines the antecedents, causes, and consequences of linguistic mimicry, which assesses how closely individuals match others’ word use. We examine mimicry of linguistic style (how things are said) and content (what is said) in online word of mouth (WOM). To our knowledge, this research provides the first demonstration of unique linguistic mimicry, where consumers engaging in online WOM differentially mimic other posters’ word use. Two experiments and one study using field data show that when consumers are personally similar to an individual who has previously posted (e.g., same gender), they mimic this individual’s positive emotion and social word use. When consumers are similar in status to an individual who has previously posted (e.g., same forum ranking), they mimic this individual’s cognitive and descriptive word use. This differential mimicry is driven by affiliation versus achievement goals, respectively, and affects consumers’ engagement in online WOM in terms of posting incidence and volume.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah G. Moore & Brent McFerran, 2017. "She Said, She Said: Differential Interpersonal Similarities Predict Unique Linguistic Mimicry in Online Word of Mouth," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 2(2), pages 229-245.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/690942
    DOI: 10.1086/690942
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/690942
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/690942
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/690942?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jonah Berger & Grant Packard & Reihane Boghrati & Ming Hsu & Ashlee Humphreys & Andrea Luangrath & Sarah Moore & Gideon Nave & Christopher Olivola & Matthew Rocklage, 2022. "Marketing insights from text analysis," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 365-377, September.
    2. Jonah Berger & Matthew D Rocklage & Grant Packard, 2022. "Expression Modalities: How Speaking Versus Writing Shapes Word of Mouth [Affective and Semantic Components in Political Person Perception]," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 49(3), pages 389-408.
    3. Motoki, Kosuke & Suzuki, Shinsuke & Kawashima, Ryuta & Sugiura, Motoaki, 2020. "A Combination of Self-Reported Data and Social-Related Neural Measures Forecasts Viral Marketing Success on Social Media," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 99-117.
    4. repec:oup:jecgeo:v:50:y:2023:i:2:p:236-254. is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Sung Youl Jun & Tae Wook Ju & Hye Kyung Park & Jacob C. Lee & Tae Min Kim, 2023. "Information distortion in word-of-mouth retransmission: the effects of retransmitter intention and source expertise," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(5), pages 1848-1876, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/690942. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JACR .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.