IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tuk/qipqip/v15y2011i16.html

Comparison of Different Approaches to the Cutting Plan Scheduling

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Bober

Abstract

Allocation of specific cutting plans and their scheduling to individual cutting machines presents a combinatorial optimization problem. In this respect, various approaches and methods are used to arrive to a viable solution. The paper reports three approaches represented by three discreet optimization methods. The first one is back-tracing algorithm and serves as a reference to verify functionality of the other two ones. The second method is optimization using genetic algorithms, and the third one presents heuristic approach to optimization based on anticipated properties of an optimal solution. Research results indicate that genetic algorithms are demanding to calculate though not dependant on the selected objective function. Heuristic algorithm is fast but dependant upon anticipated properties of the optimal solution. Hence, at change of the objective function it has to be changed. When the scheduling by genetic algorithms is solvable in a sufficiently short period of time, it is more appropriate from the practical point than the heuristic algorithm. The back-tracing algorithm usually does not provide a result in a feasible period of time.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Bober, 2011. "Comparison of Different Approaches to the Cutting Plan Scheduling," Quality Innovation Prosperity, Technical University of Košice, Department of integrated management, vol. 15(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:tuk:qipqip:v:15:y:2011:i:1:6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.qip-journal.eu/index.php/QIP/article/download/35/23
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dhaenens, C. & Lemesre, J. & Talbi, E.G., 2010. "K-PPM: A new exact method to solve multi-objective combinatorial optimization problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 45-53, January.
    2. Pentico, David W., 2007. "Assignment problems: A golden anniversary survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(2), pages 774-793, January.
    3. Jaszkiewicz, Andrzej, 2002. "Genetic local search for multi-objective combinatorial optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(1), pages 50-71, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amit Kumar & Anila Gupta, 2013. "Mehar’s methods for fuzzy assignment problems with restrictions," Fuzzy Information and Engineering, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 27-44, March.
    2. Pritibhushan Sinha, 2009. "Assignment problems with changeover cost," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 172(1), pages 447-457, November.
    3. Satya Tamby & Daniel Vanderpooten, 2021. "Enumeration of the Nondominated Set of Multiobjective Discrete Optimization Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 72-85, January.
    4. Qingzhu Yao & Xiaoyan Zhu & Way Kuo, 2014. "A Birnbaum-importance based genetic local search algorithm for component assignment problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 212(1), pages 185-200, January.
    5. Tobias Kuhn & Stefan Ruzika, 2017. "A coverage-based Box-Algorithm to compute a representation for optimization problems with three objective functions," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 67(3), pages 581-600, March.
    6. Aidin Rezaeian & Hamidreza Koosha & Mohammad Ranjbar & Saeed Poormoaied, 2024. "The assignment of project managers to projects in an uncertain dynamic environment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 341(2), pages 1107-1134, October.
    7. Ágoston, Kolos Csaba & Biró, Péter & Szántó, Richárd, 2018. "Stable project allocation under distributional constraints," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 59-68.
    8. Qing Han, 2013. "Managing Emergencies Optimally Using a Random Neural Network-Based Algorithm," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-20, October.
    9. Morrill, Thayer & Roth, Alvin E., 2024. "Top trading cycles," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    10. Selçuklu, Saltuk Buğra & Coit, David W. & Felder, Frank A., 2020. "Pareto uncertainty index for evaluating and comparing solutions for stochastic multiple objective problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(2), pages 644-659.
    11. Christian Billing & Florian Jaehn & Thomas Wensing, 2020. "Fair task allocation problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 284(1), pages 131-146, January.
    12. Diefenbach, Heiko & Emde, Simon & Glock, Christoph H., 2020. "Loading tow trains ergonomically for just-in-time part supply," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(1), pages 325-344.
    13. Emiliya Lazarova & Peter Borm & Arantza Estévez-Fernández, 2016. "Transfers and exchange-stability in two-sided matching problems," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 81(1), pages 53-71, June.
    14. Kirlik, Gokhan & Sayın, Serpil, 2014. "A new algorithm for generating all nondominated solutions of multiobjective discrete optimization problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(3), pages 479-488.
    15. Nghe, Philippe & Mulder, Bela M. & Tans, Sander J., 2018. "A graph-based algorithm for the multi-objective optimization of gene regulatory networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(2), pages 784-793.
    16. Igor Litvinchev & Socorro Rangel & Jania Saucedo, 2010. "A Lagrangian bound for many-to-many assignment problems," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 241-257, April.
    17. Arroyo, Jose Elias Claudio & Armentano, Vinicius Amaral, 2005. "Genetic local search for multi-objective flowshop scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(3), pages 717-738, December.
    18. Mei, Yi & Salim, Flora D. & Li, Xiaodong, 2016. "Efficient meta-heuristics for the Multi-Objective Time-Dependent Orienteering Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(2), pages 443-457.
    19. Lin, Yi-Kuei & Yeh, Cheng-Ta, 2012. "Determining the optimal double-component assignment for a stochastic computer network," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 120-130, January.
    20. Bogdan Rębiasz, 2009. "A method for selecting an effective investment project portfolio," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 19(3), pages 95-117.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Z - Other Special Topics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tuk:qipqip:v:15:y:2011:i:1:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Bober (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.