IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tsj/stataj/v8y2008i2p147-169.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multinomial goodness-of-fit: Large-sample tests with survey design correction and exact tests for small samples

Author

Listed:
  • Ben Jann

    (ETH Zurich)

Abstract

I introduce the new mgof command to compute distributional tests for discrete (categorical, multinomial) variables. The command supports large-sample tests for complex survey designs and exact tests for small samples as well as classic large-sample Chi^2-approximation tests based on Pearson’s Chi^2, the likelihood ratio, or any other statistic from the power-divergence family (Cressie and Read, 1984, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological) 46: 440 – 464). The complex survey correction is based on the approach by Rao and Scott (1981, Journal of the American Statistical Association 76: 221 – 230) and par- allels the survey design correction used for independence tests in svy: tabulate. mgof computes the exact tests by using Monte Carlo methods or exhaustive enu- meration. mgof also provides an exact one-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for discrete data. Copyright 2008 by StataCorp LP.

Suggested Citation

  • Ben Jann, 2008. "Multinomial goodness-of-fit: Large-sample tests with survey design correction and exact tests for small samples," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 8(2), pages 147-169, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:tsj:stataj:v:8:y:2008:i:2:p:147-169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.stata-journal.com/article.html?article=st0142
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.stata-journal.com/software/sj8-2/st0142/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Scott A. Brave & Kevin A. Roberts, 2019. "The Competitive Effects of Performance-Enhancing Drugs: MLB in the Posttesting Era," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 20(6), pages 747-781, August.
    2. Bašić, Zvonimir & Quercia, Simone, 2022. "The influence of self and social image concerns on lying," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 162-169.
    3. John Micklewright & Sylke V. Schnepf, 2010. "How reliable are income data collected with a single question?," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 173(2), pages 409-429, April.
    4. Ioana Sorina Deleanu, 2017. "Do Countries Consistently Engage in Misinforming the International Community about Their Efforts to Combat Money Laundering? Evidence Using Benford’s Law," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, January.
    5. Hopp, Christian & Hoover, Gary A., 2017. "How prevalent is academic misconduct in management research?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 73-81.
    6. Toke Reinholt Fosgaard, 2020. "Students Cheat More: Comparing the Dishonesty of a Student Sample and a Representative Sample in the Laboratory," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 122(1), pages 257-279, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    mgof; mgofi; multinomial; goodness-of-fit; chi-squared; cat- egorical data; exact tests; Monte Carlo; exhaustive enumeration; combinatorial algorithms; complex survey correction; power-divergence statistic; Kolmogorov-Smirnov; Benford's law;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C12 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Hypothesis Testing: General
    • C16 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Econometric and Statistical Methods; Specific Distributions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tsj:stataj:v:8:y:2008:i:2:p:147-169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum or Lisa Gilmore (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.stata-journal.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.