IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tei/journl/v14y2021i2p68-77.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing University Acceleration Programs. The Case of NKUA’s Multistage Model

Author

Listed:
  • Antonios D. Livieratos

    (Department of Business Administratiom, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece)

  • Vasilis Siemos

    (Arcimedes Center for Research, Innovation and Entrepreneurship, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece)

Abstract

Purpose: Business accelerators have rapidly emerged as prominent players in the entrepreneurial ecosystem. A key strategic decision in designing acceleration programs is whether to customize or standardize the new venture development program (Cohen et al., 2019). Recognizing a trade-off between customization and standardization, the paper presents a multistage acceleration model aiming to harvest benefits of standardization while keeping several advantages found in tailor-made acceleration programs. Design/methodology/approach: The here-proposed 3-stage acceleration model was developed to serve the needs of the recently established business accelerator of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA). As the authors have developed and are currently implementing the ‘Archimedes Multistage Acceleration Model’ they act as change agents aiming to solve practical problems. This enabled the adoption of an action research approach where the aim is to produce knowledge to change social reality rather than vice versa (Allard-Poesi and Perret, 2003). To that end, the Action Innovation Management Research framework (Guertler et al., 2020) constitutes the basis of this research. Findings: The ‘Archimedes Multistage Acceleration Model’ proposes a 3-stage acceleration program where each stage matches a different level of maturity. For those statups positioned in the first two stages the aim is to progressively (and selectively) assist them through to the next stages. This model may be regarded as a funnel where startups are initially supported in the framework of a highly standardized acceleration program, ending gradually to receive highly tailored-made services. This design serves the needs of university accelerators that target a subset of the local startup ecosystem and aim to foster an entrepreneurship culture. Research limitations/implications: ‘Archimedes Multistage Acceleration Model’ was developed for, and up to this point applied at NKUA for almost a year. It is widely accepted that effectively supporting startups is a long-term process and as such a model serving this purpose requires more time to demonstrate its full potential. Furthermore, the application of the model at other universities will provide further evidence on both its value for other business accelerators and its transferability. Originality/value: Despite the growing interest in business accelerators, university accelerators remain an overlooked topic in the literature. The paper proposes a new acceleration model and presents how this is applied in the case of the Archimedes Center of NKUA. The model that harvests benefits of standardization while keeping several advantages found in tailor-made acceleration programs, is especially designed to serve the needs and the objectives of university accelerators.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonios D. Livieratos & Vasilis Siemos, 2021. "Optimizing University Acceleration Programs. The Case of NKUA’s Multistage Model," International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research (IJBESAR), International Hellenic University (IHU), Kavala Campus, Greece (formerly Eastern Macedonia and Thrace Institute of Technology - EMaTTech), vol. 14(2), pages 68-77, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:tei:journl:v:14:y:2021:i:2:p:68-77
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ijbesar.ihu.gr/docs/volume14_issue2/14_02_06.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://ijbesar.ihu.gr/volume14_issue2.php
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Goldfarb, Brent & Kirsch, David & Miller, David A., 2007. "Was there too little entry during the Dot Com Era?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 100-144, October.
    2. Susan Cohen, 2013. "What Do Accelerators Do? Insights from Incubators and Angels," Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, MIT Press, vol. 8(3-4), pages 19-25, December.
    3. Katimertzopoulos, F. & Vlados, Ch., 2017. "Local Support Mechanisms for Entrepreneurship: The Approach of Local Development and Innovation Institutions," International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research (IJBESAR), International Hellenic University (IHU), Kavala Campus, Greece (formerly Eastern Macedonia and Thrace Institute of Technology - EMaTTech), vol. 10(1), pages 30-41, March.
    4. Vesna Karadzic & Radivoje Drobnjak & Manijeh Reyhani, 2015. "Opportunities and challenges in promoting youth entrepreneurship in Montenegro," International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research (IJBESAR), International Hellenic University (IHU), Kavala Campus, Greece (formerly Eastern Macedonia and Thrace Institute of Technology - EMaTTech), vol. 8(3), pages 13-20, December.
    5. Mike Wright & Donald S. Siegel & Philippe Mustar, 2017. "An emerging ecosystem for student start-ups," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(4), pages 909-922, August.
    6. Shiri M Breznitz & Qiantao Zhang, 2019. "Fostering the growth of student start-ups from university accelerators: an entrepreneurial ecosystem perspective," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 28(4), pages 855-873.
    7. Cohen, Susan & Fehder, Daniel C. & Hochberg, Yael V. & Murray, Fiona, 2019. "The design of startup accelerators," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(7), pages 1781-1797.
    8. Yvonne Giordano, 2003. "Conduire un projet de recherche. Une perspective qualitative," Post-Print halshs-00440011, HAL.
    9. Valerija Botrić & Ljiljana Božić, 2015. "Fostering Innovation through Creativity Stimulation Methods in Croatia," International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research (IJBESAR), International Hellenic University (IHU), Kavala Campus, Greece (formerly Eastern Macedonia and Thrace Institute of Technology - EMaTTech), vol. 8(1), pages 7-24, August.
    10. Simeon Karafolas & Maciej Woźniak, 2020. "The Development of Small Enterprises During and After Crisis: Comparative Analysis of Greece and Poland," International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research (IJBESAR), International Hellenic University (IHU), Kavala Campus, Greece (formerly Eastern Macedonia and Thrace Institute of Technology - EMaTTech), vol. 13(2), pages 30-38, September.
    11. Emil Lucian Crișan & Irina Iulia Salanță & Ioana Natalia Beleiu & Ovidiu Niculae Bordean & Raluca Bunduchi, 2021. "A systematic literature review on accelerators," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 62-89, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emil Lucian Crișan & Irina Iulia Salanță & Ioana Natalia Beleiu & Ovidiu Niculae Bordean & Raluca Bunduchi, 2021. "A systematic literature review on accelerators," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 62-89, February.
    2. Navid Mohammadi & Shaghayegh Sakhteh, 2023. "Start-up accelerator value chain: a systematic literature review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(2), pages 661-694, June.
    3. Merguei, Nitzan & Costa, Carla, 2022. "What are pre-acceleration programs?," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 18(C).
    4. Charlene L. Nicholls-Nixon & Dave Valliere & Steven A. Gedeon & Sean Wise, 2021. "Entrepreneurial ecosystems and the lifecycle of university business incubators: An integrative case study," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 809-837, June.
    5. Farzana Chowdhury & David B. Audretsch, 2024. "Paradoxes of accelerator programs and new venture performance: Do varieties of experiences make a difference?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 62(1), pages 381-409, January.
    6. Alexander Kramer & Dominik K. Kanbach, 2023. "Relationship-building in the post-acceleration phase of corporate accelerators: empirical evidence from Germany," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 755-779, June.
    7. Alex Maritz & Quan Nguyen & Hsin-Ming Hsieh, 2021. "Exploring the Strategic Intent and Practices of University Accelerators: A Case of Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-11, September.
    8. Fink, Alexander A. & Klöckner, Maximilian & Räder, Tobias & Wagner, Stephan M., 2022. "Supply chain management accelerators: Types, objectives, and key design features," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    9. Rocha, Augusto & Brown, Ross & Mawson, Suzanne, 2021. "Capturing conversations in entrepreneurial ecosystems," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
    10. Dahlander, Linus & Gann, David M. & Wallin, Martin W., 2021. "How open is innovation? A retrospective and ideas forward," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(4).
    11. Desislava Yordanova & José António Filipe & Manuel Pacheco Coelho, 2020. "Technopreneurial Intentions among Bulgarian STEM Students: The Role of University," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-19, August.
    12. Benjamin L. Hallen & Susan L. Cohen & Christopher B. Bingham, 2020. "Do Accelerators Work? If So, How?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 378-414, March.
    13. Manning, Stephan & Vavilov, Stanislav, 2023. "Global development agenda meets local opportunities: The rise of development-focused entrepreneurship support," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(7).
    14. Ben Spigel & Fizza Khalid & David Wolfe, 2023. "Alacrity: a new model for venture acceleration," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 237-259, March.
    15. Merguei, Nitzan, 2022. "Venturing out: Designing effective pre-acceleration programs," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    16. Berna Beyhan & Derya Fındık, 2022. "Selection of Sustainability Startups for Acceleration: How Prior Access to Financing and Team Features Influence Accelerators’ Selection Decisions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-23, February.
    17. Domicián Máté & Ni Made Estiyanti & Adam Novotny, 2024. "How to support innovative small firms? Bibliometric analysis and visualization of start-up incubation," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-26, December.
    18. Avnimelech, Gil & Rechter, Eyal, 2023. "How and why accelerators enhance female entrepreneurship," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(2).
    19. Nicola Del Sarto & Giulio Ferrigno & Vinit Parida & Alberto Minin, 2023. "Do start-ups benefit from coworking spaces? An empirical analysis of accelerators’ programs," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(7), pages 2471-2502, October.
    20. Gonzalez-Uribe, Juanita & Hmaddi, Ouafaa, 2022. "The multi-dimensional impacts of business accelerators: what does the research tell us?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115461, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Accelerator; Startup. National and Kapodistrian University of Athens; Case study; Lean startup; University; Innovation; Action Research;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M13 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - New Firms; Startups
    • L26 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Entrepreneurship
    • L30 - Industrial Organization - - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise - - - General
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tei:journl:v:14:y:2021:i:2:p:68-77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kostas Stergidis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dbikagr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.