IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tec/journl/v24y2021i1p623-637.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Traditional ecological institutions and natural resource governance – a study of selected traditional communities in Ghana

Author

Listed:
  • Edwin Kodwo Kuntu Blankson

    (PhD. Course Tutor, College of Distance Education, University of Cape Coast)

Abstract

Studies on Natural Resource Governance (NRG) have often explored the institutions, principles and processes of governance and promoted the practice of endogenous governance systems as a better alternative to statutory imported governance systems. Empirical studies on Natural Resource Governance (NRG) in traditional communities have however not explored sufficiently the dynamics and processes of integrating Traditional Ecological Institutions (TEIs) in to NRG. The main objective of the study was to explore the nature of resource governance in Boabeng – Fiema, Tafi – Atome and Amansuri communities in Ghana. Additionally, the study examined the role of Traditional Ecological Institutions in the governance process and explained the role played by the TEIs in achieving the governance principles. The study employed a multiple-case study approach using a qualitative study design. A combination of convenience and purposive sampling were used to select the respondents. Data collection was through interviewing, focus group discussion, and observation. Qualitative data analysis involved thematic analysis, discourse analysis, and interpretative phenomenological analysis. The study revealed that the governance system relied mostly on traditional ecological institutions, laws, processes. Moreover, the key institutions that were major governance players were the chieftaincy, the traditional priesthood, and the clan/ family institutions. The roles played by the institutions differed from community to community but mainly centered on law enforcement, monitoring, and review of ecological laws on natural resource use and conservation. The main recommendation was that, for the integration of TEIs into NRG system to be improved, there was the need to properly document the TEK and Traditional Governance regimes that justified the involvement of these institutions in NRG

Suggested Citation

  • Edwin Kodwo Kuntu Blankson, 2021. "Traditional ecological institutions and natural resource governance – a study of selected traditional communities in Ghana," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 24(1), pages 623-637, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:24:y:2021:i:1:p:623-637
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/4622/1697
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/4622
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barthel, Stephan & Isendahl, Christian, 2013. "Urban gardens, agriculture, and water management: Sources of resilience for long-term food security in cities," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 224-234.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ishak Norziha & Abdullah Rosazlin & Rosli Noor Sharina Mohd & Halim Nur Sa’adah Abdul & Majid Hazreenbdul & Ariffin Fazilah, 2022. "Challenges of Urban Garden Initiatives for Food Security in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 41(4), pages 57-72, December.
    2. Ragnheiður Bogadóttir, 2020. "The Social Metabolism of Quiet Sustainability in the Faroe Islands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, January.
    3. Xiaolu Yan & Xinyuan Li & Chenghao Liu & Jiawei Li & Jingqiu Zhong, 2022. "Scales and Historical Evolution: Methods to Reveal the Relationships between Ecosystem Service Bundles and Socio-Ecological Drivers—A Case Study of Dalian City, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-20, September.
    4. Schäffler, Alexis & Swilling, Mark, 2013. "Valuing green infrastructure in an urban environment under pressure — The Johannesburg case," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 246-257.
    5. Dennis, Matthew & James, Philip, 2017. "Ecosystem services of collectively managed urban gardens: Exploring factors affecting synergies and trade-offs at the site level," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 26(PA), pages 17-26.
    6. Miličić, Vesna & Udovč, Andrej, 2014. "Increasing the competitiveness through development of an integrated market of agricultural products," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182928, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Leslie Gray & Laureen Elgert & Antoinette WinklerPrins, 2020. "Theorizing urban agriculture: north–south convergence," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 37(3), pages 869-883, September.
    8. Naji Akbar & Ismaila Rimi Abubakar & Ayesha Agha Shah & Wafa Al-Madani, 2021. "Ecological Embeddedness in the Maya Built Environment: Inspiration for Contemporary Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-29, December.
    9. Joanna Sanecka & Stephan Barthel & Johan Colding, 2020. "Countryside within the City: A Motivating Vision behind Civic Green Area Stewardship in Warsaw, Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, March.
    10. Patrizia Ghisellini & Amos Ncube & Gloria Rotolo & Chiara Vassillo & Serena Kaiser & Renato Passaro & Sergio Ulgiati, 2023. "Evaluating Environmental and Energy Performance Indicators of Food Systems, within Circular Economy and “Farm to Fork” Frameworks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-38, February.
    11. Albert Ayorinde Abegunde, 2017. "Local communities’ belief in climate change in a rural region of Sub-Saharan Africa," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1489-1522, August.
    12. Kristine Lien Skog, 2018. "How Do Policies and Actors’ Attitudes, Interests and Interactions Influence Farmland Conversion Outcomes in Land-Use Planning?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-20, June.
    13. repec:thr:techub:10024:y:2021:i:1:p:623-637 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Bliss, Sam & Egler, Megan, 2020. "Ecological Economics Beyond Markets," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    15. Dafni Despoina Avgoustaki & George Xydis, 2020. "Plant factories in the water-food-energy Nexus era: a systematic bibliographical review," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 12(2), pages 253-268, April.
    16. Haiyun Xu & Tobias Plieninger & Jørgen Primdahl, 2019. "A Systematic Comparison of Cultural and Ecological Landscape Corridors in Europe," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-32, February.
    17. Anna Trembecka & Anita Kwartnik-Pruc, 2018. "An Analysis of the Changes in the Structure of Allotment Gardens in Poland and of the Process of Regulating Legal Status," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, October.
    18. Amitrajeet A. Batabyal & Karima Kourtit & Peter Nijkamp, 2019. "New Technological Knowledge, Rural and Urban Agriculture, and Steady State Economic Growth," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 717-729, September.
    19. Christophe Béné & Derek Headey & Lawrence Haddad & Klaus Grebmer, 2016. "Is resilience a useful concept in the context of food security and nutrition programmes? Some conceptual and practical considerations," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 8(1), pages 123-138, February.
    20. Rattan Lal, 2014. "Climate Strategic Soil Management," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-32, February.
    21. Pace Ricci, Jean Marc & Conrad, Elisabeth, 2018. "Exploring the feasibility of setting up community allotments on abandoned agricultural land: A place, people, policy approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 102-115.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Natural Resource; Traditional; Ecological; Governance; Institutions;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:24:y:2021:i:1:p:623-637. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tasente Tanase (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.