IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tec/busine/v4y2023i1p67-76.html

The existence of Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in economic growth, employment, and national income is the main reason for making it a priority for government and community attention. The research is oriented to determine and analyze the improvement in MSME performance through strategic management approaches, government policies, and the involvement of stakeholders. The research used quantitative methods, regression coefficient analysis, correlation, and determination. The research results show that there is government involvement as a regulator in guiding SMEs, through Law No. 20 of 2008 and other regulations. Stakeholder involvement in the form of coaching, training, mentoring, funding, and partnerships plays an important role in improving the performance of SMEs. SMEs feel that there is a revision of regulations regarding SMEs. These regulations are oriented towards supporting MSME activities to create a conducive SME business atmosphere. Efforts to empower MSMEs by stakeholders should be comprehensive, coordinated, and sustainable

Author

Listed:
  • Lucky Hikmat Maulana

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucky Hikmat Maulana, 2023. "The existence of Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in economic growth, employment, and national income is the main reason for making it a priority for government and community attention. The research is oriented to determine and analyze the," Technium Business and Management, Technium Science, vol. 4(1), pages 67-76.
    • Handle: RePEc:tec:busine:v:4:y:2023:i:1:p:67-76
    DOI: 10.47577/business.v4i.10173
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/business/article/view/10173/3965
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/business/article/view/10173
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.47577/business.v4i.10173?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:bla:afrdev:v:29:y:2017:i:s1:p:56-72 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Umiaty Hamzani, 2017. "Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) Coaching Program," GATR Journals jber138, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    3. Agnes Asemokha & Jackson Musona & Lasse Torkkeli & Sami Saarenketo, 2019. "Business model innovation and entrepreneurial orientation relationships in SMEs: Implications for international performance," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 425-453, September.
    4. Cláudia P. Ribau & António C. Moreira & Mário Raposo, 2017. "SMEs innovation capabilities and export performance: an entrepreneurial orientation view," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(5), pages 920-934, September.
    5. Godfred Adjapong Afrifa & Ishmael Tingbani, 2018. "Working capital management, cash flow and SMEs' performance," International Journal of Banking, Accounting and Finance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(1), pages 19-43.
    6. Andrea Bellucci & Luca Pennacchio & Alberto Zazzaro, 2019. "Public R&D subsidies: collaborative versus individual place-based programs for SMEs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 213-240, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vahid J Sadeghi & Arun Sukumar & Miruna Radu-Lefebvre & Richard Nyuur, 2025. "Disentangling innovation in international entrepreneurship," Post-Print hal-05325249, HAL.
    2. Dong Xiang & Roman Matousek & Andrew C. Worthington & Yue Jiang, 2025. "How Do Government Subsidies Affect Innovation? Evidence from Chinese Hi-Tech SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-23, August.
    3. Meena Madhavan & Mohammed Ali Sharafuddin & Thanapong Chaichana, 2022. "Impact of Business Model Innovation on Sustainable Performance of Processed Marine Food Product SMEs in Thailand—A PLS-SEM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-33, August.
    4. Lee, Jeongwon & Hwang, Junseok & Kim, Hana, 2022. "Different government support effects on emerging and mature ICT sectors," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    5. Yang Yang & Xuezheng Chen & Jing Gu & Hamido Fujita, 2019. "Alleviating Financing Constraints of SMEs through Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-19, January.
    6. Muhammad Yaseen & Waseem Sajjad & Supawan Visetnoi & Siti Amanah & Shahab E. Saqib, 2024. "Entrepreneurial Orientation and SMEs Efficiency With Government Financial and Non-Financial Incentives as Moderators," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, September.
    7. Shiyuan Liu & Jiang Du & Weike Zhang & Xiaoli Tian, 2021. "Opening the box of subsidies: which is more effective for innovation?," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 11(3), pages 421-449, September.
    8. Ancillai, Chiara & Sabatini, Andrea & Gatti, Marco & Perna, Andrea, 2023. "Digital technology and business model innovation: A systematic literature review and future research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    9. Mika Gabrielsson & Saara Julkunen & Svante Andersson, 2025. "The Influence of Entrepreneurial Mindsets and Business Model Practices on Firm Internationalization," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 65(2), pages 239-274, April.
    10. Diego Sancho-Bosch & Elena Huergo, 2025. "When More Is Not Better: Heterogeneous Dose–Response Effects of R&D Subsidies by Firm Size," Documentos de Trabajo del ICAE 2025-09, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Instituto Complutense de Análisis Económico.
    11. Jeongwon Lee & Kiyoon Shin & Hongbum Kim & Junseok Hwang, 2025. "Efficiency of Innovation Policy with Different Types of R&D Planning: Evidence from South Korea’s Information and Communication Technology Sector," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(1), pages 630-662, March.
    12. Ruben Fotso, 2020. "Evaluation of indirect effects of place-based science-industry transfer policies: Case of French Technological Research Institutes," Working Papers halshs-02998262, HAL.
    13. Hiroyuki Okamuro & Junichi Nishimura, 2021. "Effects of multilevel policy mix of public R&D subsidies: Empirical evidence from Japanese local SMEs [The Impact of R&D Subsidies on R&D Employment Composition]," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 48(6), pages 829-840.
    14. Hyoung Sun Yoo & Chul Lee & Seung-Pyo Jun, 2018. "The Characteristics of SMEs Preferring Cooperative Research and Development Support from the Government: The Case of Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, August.
    15. Bingqiang Li & Shan Wang & Nannan Dong & Jinzhi Li & Xi Li & He Yu, 2023. "Empirical Analysis of Subsidy Industrial Policy’s Effect on Export Innovation in the Chinese Manufacturing," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, November.
    16. Farouk Umar Kofar Naisa & Enjun Xia & Abdul Gaffar Khan & Muhammad Shaheer Nuhu & Adams Adeiza & Mohammed Sani Abdullahi, 2025. "The Impact of Open Innovation on the Performance of Multinational Corporations in Emerging Markets: an Empirical Study," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(3), pages 11731-11767, September.
    17. Elizabeth Webster & Alfons Palangkaraya & Paul H. Jensen & Russell Thomson, 2024. "The effects of university-industry collaboration subsidies on firm performance," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2024n14, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.
    18. Alberto Bertello & Paola Bernardi & Francesca Ricciardi, 2024. "Open innovation: status quo and quo vadis - an analysis of a research field," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 633-683, February.
    19. Olalekan Charles Okunlola & Imran Usman Sani & Olumide Abiodun Ayetigbo & Olajide O. Oyadeyi, 2024. "Effect of government expenditure on real economic growth in ECOWAS: assessing the moderating role of corruption and conflict," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    20. Croonen, Evelien P.M. & Huizingh, Eelko K.R.E., 2025. "Why not all ‘winners’ are successful: Explaining project performance of publicly funded innovation consortia," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:busine:v:4:y:2023:i:1:p:67-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anna Maria Golita (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.