IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tcpoxx/v22y2022i2p158-174.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Twenty years of climate policy: G20 coverage and gaps

Author

Listed:
  • Leonardo Nascimento
  • Takeshi Kuramochi
  • Gabriela Iacobuta
  • Michel den Elzen
  • Hanna Fekete
  • Marie Weishaupt
  • Heleen Laura van Soest
  • Mark Roelfsema
  • Gustavo De Vivero-Serrano
  • Swithin Lui
  • Frederic Hans
  • Maria Jose de Villafranca Casas
  • Niklas Höhne

Abstract

The number and coverage of climate change mitigation policies have increased in the past twenty years, but important policy adoption gaps remain. To analyse sectoral climate policy in the G20 over time (2000–2019), we compiled a dataset of climate change mitigation-relevant policies and identified 50 key policy options that constitute a comprehensive sectoral climate policy package. Approximately half of these policy options are not widely adopted. Adoption is particularly low for policies that aim to: phase out coal and oil and mandate energy reductions in electricity and heat supply; reduce industrial process emissions and incentivise fuel switch in industry; design urban planning strategies for retrofits; and support the use of renewable energy for cooking and heating/cooling purposes in buildings. Policies to remove fossil fuel subsidies and support carbon dioxide removal also need substantial improvement. However, many policy adoption gaps exist as the coverage of at least one policy option could be improved in each sector. Policy adoption gaps leave at least one-tenth of the G20’s emissions completely uncovered. Filling these gaps is fundamental to realize the full mitigation potential of existing policy options and to advance the transition towards global net zero greenhouse gas emissions.Key policy insights Mitigation-related policy options can be presented as a matrix by sector to shed light on what constitutes a comprehensive climate policy package; looking across sectoral climate policies helps to unpack and clarify the status of adoption.Policy adoption gaps exist in all sectors. Increasing the sectoral coverage of climate policies will help to ensure that all relevant sectoral emissions and mitigation areas are considered in national mitigation efforts.Even if an increase in policy coverage alone does not ensure emission reductions, the absence of policy coverage indicates that emissions can still be further reduced and that a portion of global emissions remain uncovered by policies.Despite the observed increase in the number and coverage of climate policies, slow progress towards reducing global emissions and meeting the collective Paris climate goals calls for more comprehensive climate change mitigation policies. Filling policy adoption gaps presents a concrete strategy to improve sectoral, national and global climate policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Leonardo Nascimento & Takeshi Kuramochi & Gabriela Iacobuta & Michel den Elzen & Hanna Fekete & Marie Weishaupt & Heleen Laura van Soest & Mark Roelfsema & Gustavo De Vivero-Serrano & Swithin Lui & Fr, 2022. "Twenty years of climate policy: G20 coverage and gaps," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 158-174, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:22:y:2022:i:2:p:158-174
    DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2021.1993776
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14693062.2021.1993776
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14693062.2021.1993776?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Azra Ghobadi & Mohammad Fallah & Reza Tavakkoli-Moghaddam & Hamed Kazemipoor, 2022. "A Fuzzy Two-Echelon Model to Optimize Energy Consumption in an Urban Logistics Network with Electric Vehicles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-31, October.
    2. Kamani, D. & Ardehali, M.M., 2023. "Long-term forecast of electrical energy consumption with considerations for solar and wind energy sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    3. Min Thura Mon & Roengchai Tansuchat & Woraphon Yamaka, 2024. "CCUS Technology and Carbon Emissions: Evidence from the United States," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-18, April.
    4. Maksym Chepeliev, 2023. "GTAP-Power Data Base: Version 11," Journal of Global Economic Analysis, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, vol. 8(2), pages 100-133, December.
    5. Lucía Penalba-Sánchez & Elisa Di Gregorio & Raquel Claro & Mafalda Pinto & Elisabete Pinto & Patrícia Oliveira-Silva, 2024. "Bridging the Gap: Exploring the Role of Locus of Control in the Transition from Environmental Concerns to Organic Product Consumption in North Portugal, a SmartPLS Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-12, February.
    6. Michel G. J. Elzen & Ioannis Dafnomilis & Nicklas Forsell & Panagiotis Fragkos & Kostas Fragkiadakis & Niklas Höhne & Takeshi Kuramochi & Leonardo Nascimento & Mark Roelfsema & Heleen Soest & Frank Sp, 2022. "Updated nationally determined contributions collectively raise ambition levels but need strengthening further to keep Paris goals within reach," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 27(5), pages 1-29, June.
    7. Michel G. J. Elzen & Ioannis Dafnomilis & Nicklas Forsell & Panagiotis Fragkos & Kostas Fragkiadakis & Niklas Höhne & Takeshi Kuramochi & Leonardo Nascimento & Mark Roelfsema & Heleen Soest & Frank Sp, 2022. "Updated nationally determined contributions collectively raise ambition levels but need strengthening further to keep Paris goals within reach," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 27(6), pages 1-29, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:22:y:2022:i:2:p:158-174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tcpo20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.