IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tcpoxx/v17y2017i1p9-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Climate change after Paris: from turning point to transformation

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Kinley

Abstract

COP 21 was the most successful climate change conference ever. This article lays out eight key ways in which the Paris Conference changed the game: the shift in emphasis towards national action; cementing of the below 2 °C goal and going further to reference 1.5 °C; the addition of ‘global peaking’ and balance between emissions and removals as supplementary goals; global stock-taking every five years with no backsliding; much more nuanced differentiation between developed and developing countries; greater recognition of adaptation and the inclusion of loss and damage; new developments on finance, including stronger reporting provisions; and renewed recognition of market mechanisms.Policy announcements and initiatives made outside of the formal negotiations were also spectacular in scale and scope, suggesting that a new sustainable growth model is underway. At the same time, non-state actors are becoming the engine of both mitigation and adaptation action. There are several reasons for the success of COP 21, including the positive underlying economic realities, a strong determination to succeed on the part of all governments, outstanding diplomacy on the part of the French Presidency and the realization that all must participate in solving the huge global challenge posed by climate change. The game is not over, however. Targets now need to be exceeded and strengthened, without waiting for the formal review processes. Implementation rules must be developed and the pledged support for developing countries must be actioned. The Paris Agreement provides the directional signal, but it is through its implementation that its ultimate success will be judged.Policy relevanceThis article, which presents the perspective of a senior international climate change official, will assist policy makers in better understanding the Paris Agreement and its achievements, along with wider dynamics in the international climate change regime.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Kinley, 2017. "Climate change after Paris: from turning point to transformation," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 9-15, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:17:y:2017:i:1:p:9-15
    DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2016.1191009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14693062.2016.1191009
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14693062.2016.1191009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiaying Peng & Yuhang Zheng & Ke Mao, 2021. "Heterogeneous Impacts of Extreme Climate Risks on Global Energy Consumption Transition: An International Comparative Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Kuang-Feng Cheng & Chien-Shu Tsai & Chu-Chuan Hsu & Szu-Chung Lin & Ting-Chung Tsai & Jen-Yao Lee, 2019. "Emission Tax and Compensation Subsidy with Cross-Industry Pollution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-23, February.
    3. Babutsidze, Zakaria & Chai, Andreas, 2018. "Look at me Saving the Planet! The Imitation of Visible Green Behavior and its Impact on the Climate Value-Action Gap," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 290-303.
    4. Andreas Chai, 2017. "Interdisciplinary and evolutionary perspectives on managing the transition to a sustainable economy," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 1-5, April.
    5. Lukas Hermwille & Lisa Sanderink, 2019. "Make Fossil Fuels Great Again? The Paris Agreement, Trump, and the USFossil Fuel Industry," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 19(4), pages 45-62, November.
    6. Wachsmuth, Jakob & Schaeffer, Michiel & Hare, Bill, 2018. "The EU long-term strategy to reduce GHG emissions in light of the Paris Agreement and the IPCC Special Report on 1,5°C," Working Papers "Sustainability and Innovation" S22/2018, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    7. Frida Boräng & Simon Felgendreher & Niklas Harring & Åsa Löfgren, 2019. "Committing to the Climate: A Global Study of Accountable Climate Targets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-11, March.
    8. Khanyisa B. Mantlana & Malebajoa A. Maoela & Godwell Nhamo, 2021. "Mapping South Africaʼs nationally determined contributions to the targets of the sustainable development goals," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 45(1), pages 3-17, February.
    9. Ayough, Ashkan & Boshruei, Setareh & Khorshidvand, Behrooz, 2022. "A new interactive method based on multi-criteria preference degree functions for solar power plant site selection," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 1165-1173.
    10. Huang Huang & Stefano Castruccio & Marc G. Genton, 2022. "Forecasting high‐frequency spatio‐temporal wind power with dimensionally reduced echo state networks," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(2), pages 449-466, March.
    11. Neli Aparecida de Mello-Théry & Eduardo de Lima Caldas & Beatriz M. Funatsu & Damien Arvor & Vincent Dubreuil, 2020. "Climate Change and Public Policies in the Brazilian Amazon State of Mato Grosso: Perceptions and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-20, June.
    12. Giani, Paolo & Tagle, Felipe & Genton, Marc G. & Castruccio, Stefano & Crippa, Paola, 2020. "Closing the gap between wind energy targets and implementation for emerging countries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:17:y:2017:i:1:p:9-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tcpo20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.