IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpxmxx/v20y2018i10p1423-1443.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Work motivation and public service motivation: disentangling varieties of motivation and job satisfaction

Author

Listed:
  • Jessica Breaugh
  • Adrian Ritz
  • Kerstin Alfes

Abstract

Research on motivation in the public sector has used public service motivation (PSM) and self-determination theory (SDT) interchangeably. This paper compares both theories, develops hypotheses pertaining to their assumptions, and empirically tests them in two public offices in Switzerland. We then explore their relationship with job satisfaction as an indicator of predictive validity. We find that SDT and PSM display conceptual differentiation and SDT has a strongest relationship to job satisfaction. However, moderation analysis suggests that employees with high levels of PSM have more stable job satisfaction compared to their low-PSM counterparts.

Suggested Citation

  • Jessica Breaugh & Adrian Ritz & Kerstin Alfes, 2018. "Work motivation and public service motivation: disentangling varieties of motivation and job satisfaction," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(10), pages 1423-1443, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpxmxx:v:20:y:2018:i:10:p:1423-1443
    DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2017.1400580
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14719037.2017.1400580
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14719037.2017.1400580?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michał Szulawski & Łukasz Baka & Monika Prusik & Anja H Olafsen, 2021. "The basic psychological needs satisfaction and frustration scale at work: A validation in the Polish language," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Alina-Georgiana PROFIROIU & Oana-Matilda SABIE & Corina-Cristiana NASTACA, 2022. "A Qualitative Research On Civil Servants' Motivation From Romanian Public Administration," APPLIED RESEARCH IN ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 3(2), pages 37-49, August.
    3. Dobrinić Dunja & Fabac Robert, 2021. "Familiarity with Mission and Vision: Impact on Organizational Commitment and Job Satisfaction," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 124-143, May.
    4. Maczulskij, Terhi & Viinikainen, Jutta, 2021. "Personality and Public Sector Employment," ETLA Working Papers 86, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    5. Jacob Torfing & Tina Øllgaard Bentzen, 2020. "Does Stewardship Theory Provide a Viable Alternative to Control-Fixated Performance Management?," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, November.
    6. Deli Yuan & Md. Abu Issa Gazi & Md. Alinoor Rahman, 2022. "Assessment of Both Personal and Professional Aspects to Measure Job Satisfaction Levels among Garment Workers: Empirical Evidence from a Developing Country," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-25, December.
    7. Adela Reig-Botella & Miguel Clemente & Sarah Detaille & Annet H. de Lange & Jaime López-Golpe, 2022. "Which Personal and Organizational Factors Influence the Organizational Commitment and Job Satisfaction of Shipyard Blue-Collar Workers?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-14, April.
    8. Khawlah AL-TKHAYNEH & Sebastian KOT & Viktor SHESTAK, 2019. "Motivation And Demotivation Factors Affecting Productivity In Public Sector," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2019(33), pages 77-102, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpxmxx:v:20:y:2018:i:10:p:1423-1443. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rpxm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.