IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i8p4849-d795428.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Which Personal and Organizational Factors Influence the Organizational Commitment and Job Satisfaction of Shipyard Blue-Collar Workers?

Author

Listed:
  • Adela Reig-Botella

    (Department of Human Resource Management, HAN University of Applied Sciences in Nijmegen, 6525 EJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
    Department of Psychology, Campus Industrial de Ferrol, Universidade da Coruña, 15403 Ferrol, Spain)

  • Miguel Clemente

    (Department of Psychology, Campus de A Coruña, Universidade da Coruña, 15701 A Coruña, Spain)

  • Sarah Detaille

    (Department of Human Resource Management, HAN University of Applied Sciences in Nijmegen, 6525 EJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
    Department of Psychology, Campus de A Coruña, Universidade da Coruña, 15701 A Coruña, Spain)

  • Annet H. de Lange

    (Department of Human Resource Management, HAN University of Applied Sciences in Nijmegen, 6525 EJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
    Department of Psychology, Campus de A Coruña, Universidade da Coruña, 15701 A Coruña, Spain
    Faculty of Psychology, Open University Heerlen, 6419 AT Heerlen, The Netherlands
    Norwegian School of Hotel Management, University of Stavanger, 4021 Stavanger, Norway)

  • Jaime López-Golpe

    (Department of Psychology, Campus de A Coruña, Universidade da Coruña, 15701 A Coruña, Spain)

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this research was to analyze which personal and organizational factors are related to organizational commitment and job satisfaction of shipyard workers who work in different auxiliary shipyard military companies in the north of Spain. Methods: In total, 567 shipyard workers participated in this cross-sectional survey study. The ages were between 19 and 64 (M = 39.36, SD = 10.01), males 82.52%, females 17.48%. We used a survey that included questions about personal and organizational factors such as physical environment, occupational risks, and psychosocial risks, in addition to the job commitment and job satisfaction scales. Results: The results of this study show that job commitment is significantly related to a higher age, lower education, and environmental risk (low vs. high). Furthermore, job satisfaction (high vs. low) and organizational commitment (high vs. low) is related with environmental risk (low vs. high). Job commitment is also higher in workers with a low educational level and older workers. Job satisfaction is lower in workers with a high educational level. Conclusions: This study shows that different personal and environmental factors influence the shipyard workers’ organizational commitment and job satisfaction.

Suggested Citation

  • Adela Reig-Botella & Miguel Clemente & Sarah Detaille & Annet H. de Lange & Jaime López-Golpe, 2022. "Which Personal and Organizational Factors Influence the Organizational Commitment and Job Satisfaction of Shipyard Blue-Collar Workers?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-14, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:8:p:4849-:d:795428
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4849/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4849/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jessica Breaugh & Adrian Ritz & Kerstin Alfes, 2018. "Work motivation and public service motivation: disentangling varieties of motivation and job satisfaction," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(10), pages 1423-1443, October.
    2. Tracey Tshivhase & Lethukuthula Vilakazi, 2018. "Job Satisfaction: What factors in the Coal Mining Industry will lead to Higher Satisfaction?," International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 4(6), pages 17-25, September.
    3. Joris van der Voet & Bram Steijn & Ben S. Kuipers, 2017. "What’s in it for others? The relationship between prosocial motivation and commitment to change among youth care professionals," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 443-462, April.
    4. Biaoan Shan & Xiaoju Liu & Anwei Gu & Runxuan Zhao, 2022. "The Effect of Occupational Health Risk Perception on Job Satisfaction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-14, February.
    5. Sarah Detaille & Adela Reig-Botella & Miguel Clemente & Jaime López-Golpe & Annet De Lange, 2020. "Burnout and Time Perspective of Blue-Collar Workers at the Shipyard," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-10, September.
    6. Adela Reig-Botella & Sarah Detaille & Miguel Clemente & Jaime López-Golpe & Annet de Lange, 2021. "Time Perspective and the Risk of Developing Burnout: An Empirical Study among Different Blue-Collar Workers in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-11, March.
    7. James W. Vaupel, 2010. "Biodemography of human ageing," Nature, Nature, vol. 464(7288), pages 536-542, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Deli Yuan & Md. Abu Issa Gazi & Md. Alinoor Rahman, 2022. "Assessment of Both Personal and Professional Aspects to Measure Job Satisfaction Levels among Garment Workers: Empirical Evidence from a Developing Country," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-25, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Deli Yuan & Md. Abu Issa Gazi & Md. Alinoor Rahman, 2022. "Assessment of Both Personal and Professional Aspects to Measure Job Satisfaction Levels among Garment Workers: Empirical Evidence from a Developing Country," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-25, December.
    2. Edouard Debonneuil & Anne Eyraud-Loisel & Frédéric Planchet, 2017. "Conditions Of Interest Of A Longevity Megafund For Pension Funds," Working Papers hal-01571937, HAL.
    3. D. Dragone & H. Strulik, 2017. "Human Health and Aging over an Infinite Time Horizon," Working Papers wp1104, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    4. Nicole L. Van Der Gaag & Govert Bijwaard & Joop de Beer & Luc Bonneux, 2015. "A multistate model to project elderly disability in case of limited data," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 32(3), pages 75-106.
    5. Melinda Heinz & Nicholas Cone & Grace Da Rosa & Alex J. Bishop & Tanya Finchum, 2017. "Examining Supportive Evidence for Psychosocial Theories of Aging within the Oral History Narratives of Centenarians," Societies, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-21, April.
    6. Duncan Gillespie & Meredith Trotter & Shripad Tuljapurkar, 2014. "Divergence in Age Patterns of Mortality Change Drives International Divergence in Lifespan Inequality," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 51(3), pages 1003-1017, June.
    7. Gregorio Gimenez & Ana Isabel Gil-Lacruz & Marta Gil-Lacruz, 2021. "Is Happiness Linked to Subjective Life Expectancy? A Study of Chilean Senior Citizens," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(17), pages 1-12, August.
    8. Kashnitsky, Ilya, 2017. "A cohort is not representative of humanity," OSF Preprints 524kg, Center for Open Science.
    9. Edouard Debonneuil & Anne Eyraud-Loisel & Frédéric Planchet, 2018. "Can Pension Funds Partially Manage Longevity Risk by Investing in a Longevity Megafund?," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-27, July.
    10. Felipe Vásquez & Gibran Vita & Daniel B. Müller, 2018. "Food Security for an Aging and Heavier Population," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-19, October.
    11. McCarthy, David G. & Wang, Po-Lin, 2021. "Pooling mortality risk in Eurozone state pension liabilities: An application of a Bayesian coherent multi-population cohort-based mortality model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 459-485.
    12. Iñigo Calvo-Sotomayor & Ekhi Atutxa & Ricardo Aguado, 2020. "Who Is Afraid of Population Aging? Myths, Challenges and an Open Question from the Civil Economy Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-17, July.
    13. Ting Li & James Anderson, 2013. "Shaping human mortality patterns through intrinsic and extrinsic vitality processes," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 28(12), pages 341-372.
    14. Vladimir Canudas-Romo & Tianyu Shen & Collin Payne, 2021. "The role of reductions in old-age mortality in old-age population growth," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 44(44), pages 1073-1084.
    15. Kulinskaya, Elena & Gitsels, Lisanne Andra & Bakbergenuly, Ilyas & Wright, Nigel R., 2021. "Dynamic hazards modelling for predictive longevity risk assessment," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 222-231.
    16. Heather L. Stuckey & Mark Peyrot & Riana Conway & Edward W. Taylor, 2022. "A conceptual validation of transformative learning theory," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 103(6), pages 1459-1474, November.
    17. A. Debòn & S. Haberman & F. Montes & E. Otranto, 2012. "Model effect on projected mortality indicators," Working Paper CRENoS 201215, Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, Sardinia.
    18. Dragone, Davide & Strulik, Holger, 2020. "Negligible senescence: An economic life cycle model for the future," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 264-285.
    19. Shulgin, Sergey & Scherbov, Sergey & Zinkina, Yulia & Novikov, Kirill, 2017. "Medical-Demographic Differentiation According to Educational Level," Working Papers 041719, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    20. Finkel, Elizabeth, 2014. "Is modern farm technology a saviour or a threat?," 2014: Ethics, Efficiency and Food Security: Feeding the 9 Billion, Well, 26-28 August 2014 225570, Crawford Fund.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:8:p:4849-:d:795428. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.