IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

The Evolution of Regional Labour Productivities in Japanese Manufacturing, 1968-2004

  • Jurgen Essletzbichler
  • Kazuo Kadokawa
Registered author(s):

    Essletzbichler J. and Kadokawa K. The evolution of regional labour productivities in Japanese manufacturing, 1968-2004. Regional Studies. The success of the Japanese economy in the post-war period was predicated on the rapid productivity catch-up of its manufacturing sector to Western economies, although productivity varied widely among Japanese regions. This paper examines the evolution of labour productivity in Japanese prefectures over the period 1968-2004. Employing Markov chain analysis, variance shift-share analysis, and analysis of variance, the paper demonstrates that during the period of fast productivity growth, the Japanese economy was characterized by an increasing polarization of productivity levels, while the period of slow growth since the early 1990s produced convergence in regional productivity levels. [image omitted] Essletzbichler J. et Kadokawa K. L'evolution de la productivite regionale du travail dans l'industrie japonaise de 1968 a 2004. Regional Studies. La reussite de l'economie japonaise pendant la periode d'apres-guerre repose sur le regain rapide de la productivite de son secteur industriel par rapport a celle des economies occidentales, bien que la productivite ait varie sensiblement au Japon a l'echelle interregionale. Cet article cherche a examiner l'evolution de la productivite du travail dans les prefectures japonaises entre 1968 et 2004. A partir d'une analyse par chaine de Markov, d'une analyse repartition-redistribution de variance et d'une analyse de la variance, cet article montre que l'economie japonaise se caracterise par une divergence accrue des niveaux de productivite pendant la periode de croissance forte de la productivite, tandis que la periode de croissance faible depuis le debut des annees 1990 fait preuve d'une convergence des niveaux de productivite regionaux. Japon Industrie Productivite Convergence regionale Analyse par chaine de Markov Analyse repartition-redistribution de variance Essletzbichler J. und Kadokawa K. Die Entwicklung der regionalen Produktivitat von Arbeitskraften im japanischen Produktionswesen, 1968-2004. Regional Studies. Der Erfolg der japanischen Wirtschaft in der Nachkriegszeit grundete darauf, dass das Land hinsichtlich der Produktivitat seines produzierenden Sektors gegenuber den westlichen Wirtschaften rasch aufholte. Allerdings fiel die Produktivitat in den verschiedenen japanischen Regionen stark unterschiedlich aus. In diesem Beitrag untersuchen wir die Entwicklung der Produktivitat von Arbeitskraften in den japanischen Prafekturen im Zeitraum von 1968 bis 2004. Anhand einer Markow-Ketten-Analyse, Varianz-Shift-Share-Analyse und Varianz-Analyse weisen wir nach, dass sich die japanische Wirtschaft in der Periode des raschen Produktivitatswachstums durch eine zunehmende Polarisierung der Produktivitatsniveaus auszeichnete, wahrend die Periode des langsamen Wachstums seit Beginn der neunziger Jahre zu einer Konvergenz der regionalen Produktivitatsniveaus fuhrte. Japan Produktion Produktivitat Regionale Konvergenz Markow-Ketten-Analyse Varianz-Shift-Share-Analyse Essletzbichler J. y Kadokawa K. La evolucion de las productividades laborales a nivel regional en el sector manufacturero de Japon, 1968-2004. Regional Studies. El exito de la economia japonesa en el periodo de posguerra se baso en el rapido aumento de productividad de su sector de manufactura hacia los niveles de las economias occidentales, aunque la productividad variaba mucho entre las diferentes regiones japonesas. En este articulo examinamos la evolucion de la productividad laboral en las prefecturas japonesas durante el periodo 1968-2004. Con ayuda de una analisis de cadenas de Markov, analisis de varianza shift-share y analisis de varianza, en este ensayo demostramos que durante el periodo de rapido crecimiento de la productividad, la economia japonesa se caracterizo por un aumento de la polarizacion de los niveles de productividad, mientras que el periodo de crecimiento lento desde principios de los noventa produjo una convergencia en los niveles de productividad regionales. Japon Industria manufacturera Productividad Convergencia regional Analisis de cadenas de Markov Analisis de varianza shift-share

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00343400903365060
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Regional Studies.

    Volume (Year): 44 (2010)
    Issue (Month): 9 ()
    Pages: 1189-1205

    as
    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:44:y:2010:i:9:p:1189-1205
    Contact details of provider: Web page: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRES20

    Order Information: Web: http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/CRES20

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    as in new window
    1. Sala-i-Martin, Xavier, 1995. "The Classical Approach to Convergence Analysis," CEPR Discussion Papers 1254, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    2. Togo, Ken, 2002. "Productivity convergence in Japan's manufacturing industries," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 61-67, March.
    3. Quah, Danny, 1993. "Empirical cross-section dynamics in economic growth," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 37(2-3), pages 426-434, April.
    4. Tan, Baris & Yilmaz, Kamil, 2002. "Markov chain test for time dependence and homogeneity: An analytical and empirical evaluation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(3), pages 524-543, March.
    5. Kang Park, 2003. "Patterns and strategies of Foreign Direct Investment: the case of Japanese firms," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(16), pages 1739-1746.
    6. Roberto Ezcurra & Pedro Pascual & Manuel Rapún, 2007. "Spatial Inequality in Productivity in the European Union: Sectoral and Regional Factors," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 30(4), pages 384-407, October.
    7. Danny Quah, 1996. "Twin peaks : growth and convergence in models of distribution dynamics," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 2278, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Barro, Robert T. & Sala-I-Martin, Xavier, 1992. "Regional growth and migration: A Japan-United States comparison," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 6(4), pages 312-346, December.
    9. Kazuhiko Kakamu & Mototsugu Fukushige, 2006. "Productivity convergence of manufacturing industries in Japanese MEA," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(10), pages 649-653.
    10. Farrell, Roger & Gaston, Noel & Sturm, Jan-Egbert, 2004. "Determinants of Japan's foreign direct investment: An industry and country panel study, 1984-1998," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 161-182, June.
    11. Quah, Danny T, 1996. "Twin Peaks: Growth and Convergence in Models of Distribution Dynamics," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 106(437), pages 1045-55, July.
    12. Shawn Banasick & Robert Hanham, 2008. "Regional Decline of Manufacturing Employment in Japan during an Era of Prolonged Stagnation," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(4), pages 489-503.
    13. Eiichi Tomiura, 2001. "The Impact of Import Competition on Japanese Manufacturing Employment," Discussion Paper Series 120, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.
    14. Fujita, Masahisa & Tabuchi, Takatoshi, 1997. "Regional growth in postwar Japan," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 643-670, November.
    15. Quah, Danny, 1993. " Galton's Fallacy and Tests of the Convergence Hypothesis," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(4), pages 427-43, December.
    16. Kazuyoshi Matsuura & Michael Pollitt & Ryoji Takada & Satoru Tanaka, 1999. "Institutional Restructuring in the Japanese Economy 1985-1996," ESRC Centre for Business Research - Working Papers wp115, ESRC Centre for Business Research.
    17. Michael Storper & Yun-chung Chen, 2002. "Trade and the location of industries in the OECD and European Union," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 2(1), pages 73-107, January.
    18. Nobuo Kobayashi, 2004. "Industrial Structure and Manufacturing Growth During Japan's Bubble and Post-Bubble Economies," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(4), pages 429-444.
    19. Eiichi Tomiura, 2003. "Changing Economic Geography and Vertical Linkages in Japan," NBER Working Papers 9899, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Danny Quah, 1996. "Twin Peaks: Growth and Convergence in Models of Distribution Dynamics," CEP Discussion Papers dp0280, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    21. David L. Rigby & J¸rgen Essletzbichler, 2002. "Agglomeration economies and productivity differences in US cities," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 2(4), pages 407-432, October.
    22. Robert Q. Hanham, 2000. "Shift-Share Analysis and Changes in Japanese Manufacturing Employment," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 108-123.
    23. Quah, Danny T., 1996. "Empirics for economic growth and convergence," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 1353-1375, June.
    24. Esteban, J., 2000. "Regional convergence in Europe and the industry mix: a shift-share analysis," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 353-364, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:44:y:2010:i:9:p:1189-1205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.