IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/regstd/v43y2009i4p571-588.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Specialization, Centralization, and the Distribution of Patent Intermediaries in the USA and Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Tim Reiffenstein

Abstract

Reiffenstein T. Specialization, centralization, and the distribution of patent intermediaries in the USA and Japan, Regional Studies. The preparation, examination and litigation of patents requires a complex division of labour. The inventors and firms that generate patents have been well covered in the geographical literature, but the same cannot be said of the producer services whose job it is to shepherd patents through patent offices and the courts. This paper explores the spatial distribution of patent intermediaries (agents and attorneys) in the USA and Japan with a view to shedding light on how the institutional architecture of national patent systems shapes the geographies of patent practitioners. This comparison reveals important differences in their locational preferences at several scales of analysis. US patent intermediation is geographically decentralized and practised in conjunction with other facets of business law, while in Japan the situation is far more specialized and concentrated in Tokyo. [image omitted] Reiffenstein T. Specialisation, centralisation et repartition des intermediaires en brevets aux Etats-Unis et au Japon, Regional Studies. La preparation, l'examen et les litiges en matiere de brevets exigent une division complexe de travail. Les inventeurs et les entreprises qui deposent des brevets ont fait l'objet de nombreux articles dans la litterature geographique mais on ne peut pas en dire autant des services de production dont le travail est de guider les brevets a travers les bureaux de brevets et les tribunaux. Cet article analyse la repartition geographique des intermediaires en brevets (agents et avocats) aux Etats-Unis et au Japon afin de faire la lumiere et d'expliquer comment l'architecture institutionnelle des systemes nationaux de brevets dessine la carte de la repartition des praticiens en brevets. Cette comparaison fait apparaitre des differences importantes en ce qui concerne les preferences geographiques a plusieurs echelles de l'analyse. Aux Etats-Unis, les intermediaires en brevets sont decentralises sur le plan geographique et travaillent conjointement avec d'autres secteurs du droit des affaires alors qu'au Japon la situation est beaucoup plus specialisee et concentree a Tokyo. Intermediaires en brevets Systemes nationaux d'innovation Etats-Unis Japon Reiffenstein T. Spezialisierung, Zentralisierung und Verteilung von Patentdienstleistern in den USA und in Japan, Regional Studies. Fur die Vorbereitung, Prufung und Einklagung von Patenten ist eine komplexe Arbeitsteilung erforderlich. Die Erfinder und Unternehmen, die Patente entwickeln, wurden in der geografischen Literatur bereits ausfuhrlich behandelt. Dasselbe lasst sich hingegen nicht von den Dienstleistern sagen, die die Patente durch Patentamter und Gerichte leiten. In diesem Beitrag wird die raumliche Verteilung von Patentdienstleistern (Vertretern und Anwalten) in den USA und Japan untersucht, um festzustellen, wie sich die institutionelle Architektur der nationalen Patentsysteme auf die Geografien der Patentdienstleister auswirkt. Bei diesem Vergleich zeigen sich auf mehreren Analyseebenen wichtige Unterschiede hinsichtlich der Standortpraferenzen. In den USA sind Patentdienstleistungen geografisch dezentralisiert und werden gemeinsam mit anderen Facetten des Wirtschaftsrechts praktiziert. In Japan ist die Situation weitaus spezialisierter und auf Tokio konzentriert. Patentdienstleister Nationale Innovationssysteme USA Japan Reiffenstein T. Especializacion, centralizacion y distribucion de intermediarios de patentes en los Estados Unidos y Japon, Regional Studies. Para la preparacion, el examen y la litigacion de patentes es necesaria una compleja division del trabajo. Los inventores y las empresas que generan patentes han sido abarcados con profusion en la literatura geografica pero no se puede decir lo mismo de los servicios de los productores cuya tarea es dirigir las patentes a traves de las oficinas de patentes y los tribunales. En este articulo analizo la distribucion espacial de los intermediarios de patentes (agentes y abogados) en los Estados Unidos y Japon con el proposito de determinar como repercute la arquitectura institucional del sistema nacional de patentes en las geografias de los profesionales de patentes. Con esta comparacion se muestran unas diferencias importantes en cuanto a las preferencias de lugar en las diferentes escalas del analisis. La intermediacion de patentes en los Estados Unidos esta geograficamente descentralizada y se practica junto con otras facetas del derecho mercantil, mientras que en Japon la situacion esta mucho mas especializada y concentrada en Tokio. Intermediarios de patentes Sistemas de innovacion nacional Estados Unidos Japon

Suggested Citation

  • Tim Reiffenstein, 2009. "Specialization, Centralization, and the Distribution of Patent Intermediaries in the USA and Japan," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(4), pages 571-588.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:43:y:2009:i:4:p:571-588
    DOI: 10.1080/00343400701874255
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00343400701874255
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00343400701874255?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Keith E. Maskus, 2006. "Reforming U.S. Patent Policy: Getting the Incentives Right," Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, MIT Press, vol. 1(4), pages 127-153, October.
    2. Markusen, Ann & Hall, Peter & Campbell, Scott & Deitrick, Sabina, 1991. "The Rise of the Gunbelt: The Military Remapping of Industrial America," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195066487, Decembrie.
    3. Girouard, Robert J., 1996. "U.S. Trade Policy and the Japanese Patent System," UCAIS Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy, Working Paper Series qt3107d3jv, UCAIS Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy, UC Berkeley.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jörn Block & Christian Fisch & Kenta Ikeuchi & Masatoshi Kato, 2022. "Trademarks as an indicator of regional innovation: evidence from Japanese prefectures," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(2), pages 190-209, February.
    2. Krzysztof Klincewicz & Szymon Szumiał, 2022. "Successful patenting—not only how, but with whom: the importance of patent attorneys," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(9), pages 5111-5137, September.
    3. Heikkilä, Jussi T.S. & Peltoniemi, Mirva, 2023. "The changing work of IPR attorneys: 30 years of institutional transitions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    4. Gaétan De Rassenfosse & Paul H. Jensen & T'Mir Julius & Alfons Palangkaraya & Elizabeth Webster, 2023. "Is the Patent System an Even Playing Field? The Effect of Patent Attorney Firms," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(1), pages 124-142, March.
    5. Peter J. Taylor & Ben Derudder & James Faulconbridge & Michael Hoyler & Pengfei Ni, 2014. "Advanced Producer Service Firms as Strategic Networks, Global Cities as Strategic Places," Economic Geography, Clark University, vol. 90(3), pages 267-291, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. de Saint-Georges, Matthis & van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, Bruno, 2013. "A quality index for patent systems," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 704-719.
    2. Davide Luca, 2022. "National elections, sub-national growth: the politics of Turkey’s provincial economic dynamics under AKP rule [Shift-share designs: theory and inference]," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 22(4), pages 829-851.
    3. Susan Christopherson & Jennifer Clark, 2010. "Limits to ‘The Learning Region’: What University-centered Economic Development Can (and Cannot) do to Create Knowledge-based Regional Economies," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 25(2), pages 120-130, March.
    4. Yu Zhou, 2005. "The Making of an Innovative Region from a Centrally Planned Economy: Institutional Evolution in Zhongguancun Science Park in Beijing," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 37(6), pages 1113-1134, June.
    5. Michael Powe & Jonathan Mabry & Emily Talen & Dillon Mahmoudi, 2016. "Jane Jacobs and the Value of Older, Smaller Buildings," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 82(2), pages 167-180, April.
    6. G Hooks & V Getz, 1998. "Federal Investments and Economic Stimulus at the End of the Cold War: The Influence of Federal Installations on Employment Growth, 1970–1990," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 30(9), pages 1695-1704, September.
    7. Ahmed S. Rahman, 2020. "Officer retention and military spending: the rise of the military‐industrial complex during the Second World War," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 73(4), pages 1074-1096, November.
    8. Josselin Droff & Alfredo R. Paloyo, 2015. "Assessing The Regional Economic Impacts Of Defense Activities: A Survey Of Methods," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 375-402, April.
    9. Riccardo Crescenzi & Alexander Jaax, 2017. "Innovation in Russia: The Territorial Dimension," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 93(1), pages 66-88, January.
    10. Elsie Echeverri‐Carroll & Sofia G. Ayala, 2009. "Wage differentials and the spatial concentration of high‐technology industries," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 88(3), pages 623-641, August.
    11. Rolf Sternberg, 2010. "Neither Planned Nor by Chance: How Knowledge-Intensive Clusters Emerge," Chapters, in: Dirk Fornahl & Sebastian Henn & Max-Peter Menzel (ed.), Emerging Clusters, chapter 12, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Sanjoy Chakravorty, 2003. "Capital source and the location of industrial investment: a tale of divergence from post-reform India," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(3), pages 365-383.
    13. Jaworski, Taylor, 2017. "World War II and the Industrialization of the American South," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 77(4), pages 1048-1082, December.
    14. Ng, Adolf K.Y. & Jiang, Changmin & Li, Xiaoyu & O'Connor, Kevin & Lee, Paul Tae-Woo, 2018. "A conceptual overview on government initiatives and the transformation of transport and regional systems," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 199-203.
    15. Somik Vinay Lall & Sanjoy Chakravorty, 2005. "Industrial Location and Spatial Inequality: Theory and Evidence from India," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(1), pages 47-68, February.
    16. Sai Balakrishnan & Narendar Pani, 2021. "Real estate politicians in India," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(10), pages 2079-2094, August.
    17. Ross Gittell & Allen Kaufman & Marvin Karson & Ron McChesney, 2000. "The New Economic Geography of the States," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 14(2), pages 182-193, May.
    18. Paul W. Rhode, 2003. "After the War Boom: Reconversion on the U.S. Pacific Coast, 1943-49," NBER Working Papers 9854, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Al James & Mia Gray & Ron Martin, 2004. "(Expanding) the Role of Geography in Public Policy," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(11), pages 1901-1905, November.
    20. Gregory Hooks & Clayton Mosher & Thomas Rotolo & Linda Lobao, 2004. "The Prison Industry: Carceral Expansion and Employment in U.S. Counties, 1969–1994," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 85(1), pages 37-57, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:43:y:2009:i:4:p:571-588. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.