IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/regstd/v40y2006i4p385-399.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Learning from conceptual flow in regional studies: Framing present debates, unbracketing past debates

Author

Listed:
  • Arnoud Lagendijk

Abstract

Lagendijk A. (2006) Learning from conceptual flow in regional studies: framing present debates, unbracketing past debates, Regional Studies 40, 385-399. The field of regional studies is characterized by an intense flow of ideas and concepts, accompanying what can be described as a restless shifting of perspectives and approaches. Most of the inspiration for this dynamics is drawn from other disciplinary fields. Yet, the importation and translation of 'external' ideas is often criticized for resulting in rather haphazard and fuzzy conceptualizations. Moreover, rather than carefully assessing new ideas and insights in the context of ongoing debates on regional development, there is a tendency to sidetrack existing lines of debate and call for new 'turns' and 'perspectives'. Without playing down the importance of conceptual innovation, the paper calls for a stronger appreciation of our conceptual inheritance. Taking the genealogy of a dominant line of thinking in the field, the 'Territorial Innovation Models', as a starting point, the paper discusses how one can advance the debate by using both 'old' and 'new' (internal and external) ideas regarding three core analytical levels in regional studies: micro, meso and macro. Recent ideas on relationality, in particular, are considered helpful in reassessing as well as refining the value of 'older' structuralist-institutionalist macro-approaches, and in situating the contribution from more recent debates on the (micro) role of cognition and knowledge. Finally, a call is made for a careful absorption of sociological work to take into account the broader (meso) institutional economic environment in which regions operate. Lagendijk A. (2006) Ce que l'on peut tirer des flux conceptuels dans le domaine des etudes regionales: articuler les debats actuels, demystifier les debats anterieurs, Regional Studies 40, 385-399. Le domaine des etudes regionales se caracterise par un flux rapide d'idees et de notions, conjointement avec un deplacement continuel de perspectives et d'approches. Dans une large mesure, cette dynamique s'inspire des autres disciplines. Toujours est-il que l'importation et la traduction des idees 'externes' se voient souvent critiquees parce qu'il en resulte des conceptualisations plutot incoherentes et floues. Qui plus est, au lieu d'evaluer avec prudence des idees et des apercus nouveaux dans le cadre des debats en cours sur l'amenagement du territoire, on a tendance a detourner le sens des debats en cours et de demander des 'tournures' et des 'perspectives' nouvelles. Sans releguer l'importance de l'innovation conceptuelle au second plan, cet article cherche a reclamer une meilleure comprehension du patrimoine conceptuel. Prenant comme point de depart la genealogie d'une ligne de pensee dominante dans ce domaine, les 'Territorial Innovation Models' (modeles de l'innovation territoriale), cet article cherche a discuter comment on pourrait avancer le debat en employant a la fois les 'nouvelles' et les 'anciennes' idees (internes et externes) a l'egard de trois niveaux analytiques de base dans le domaine des etudes regionales: a savoir, micro, meso et macro. On considere que les idees recentes sur la notion de relationalite en particulier aident non seulement a evaluer mais aussi a peaufiner la valeur des approches macro-structuralo-institutionalistes plus anciennes, et a positionner la contribution des debats plus recents a propos du role (micro) de la cognition et de la connaissance. Pour conclure, on reclame l'integration prudente du travail sociologique afin de tenir compte du milieu economique institutionnel plus large (meso) ou fonctionnent les regions. Etudes regionales Geographie economique Approche de controle Approches institutionnelles Approches cognitives Lagendijk A. (2006) Lehren von der Begriffsentwicklung in Regional Studies: gegenwartiger Debatten, Klarung fruherer Debatten, Regional Studies 40, 385-399. Das Terrain der Zeitschrift 'Regional Studies' ist von einem kraftigen Strom von Begriffen und Ideen gekennzeichnet, der von einer als unaufhorlich zu bezeichnend Verschiebung der Perspektiven und Ansichten begleitet wird. Die meisten Inspirationen fu¨r diese Dynamik kommen von anderen Disziplinen. Doch die Einfuhrung und Ubertragung 'von aussen kommender' Ideen wird oft kritisiert, dass sie zu zusatzlichen willkurlichen und verschwommenen Begriffsbildungen fuhrt. Ausserdem lasst sich statt sorgfaltiger Beurteilung neuer Ideen und Einsichten im Zusammenhang mit noch nicht abgeschlossenen Debatten uber regionale Entwicklung eine Tendenz beobachten, von vorhandenen, bereits debattierten Debattenketten abzulenken, und neue 'Wendungen'und Perspektiven zu verlangen. Ohne die Bedeutung begrifflicher Innovation herunterspielen zu wollen, tritt dieser Aufsatz dafur ein, unser begriffliches Erbe starker zu berucksichtigen. Vom Ausgangspunkt der Genealogie des 'territorialen Innovationsmodells', einer vorherrschenden Betrachtungsweise auf diesem Gebiet, wird in diesem Aufsatz diskutiert, wie man die Debatte unter Anwendung 'alter' und 'neuer' (interner und externer) Ideen in Regional Studies in Hinsicht auf drei analytische Hauptebenen: micro, meso und macro fordern konnte. Kurzlich geausserte Ideen, insbesondere solche uber Relationalitat, werden als nutzlich angesehen, sowohl bei Neuberechnung wie auch bei Verfeinerung der Werte 'alterer' strukturalist-institutionalistischer Makroansatze, und fur die Ansiedlung der Beitrage jungerer Debatten uber die (Mikro)rolle von Erkenntnis und Kenntnissen. Abschliessend wurde zur vorsichtigen Absorption soziologischer Arbeiten aufgerufen, um die umfassendere (meso)institutionelle Wirtschaftsumwelt, in der Regionen funktionieren, zu berucksichtigen. Regionalstudien Verordnungsansatz institutionelle Ansatze Wirtschaftsgeographie kognitive Ansatze Lagendijk A. (2006) Aprender del flujo conceptual en estudios regionales: Formulando debates presentes y descatalogando debates pasados, Regional Studies 40, 385-399. El campo de los estudios regionales se caracteriza por un intenso flujo de ideas y conceptos que acompanan a lo que se puede describir como un agitado cambio de perspectivas y planteamientos. La principal inspiracion para esta dinamica viene de otros campos disciplinarios. No obstante, muchas veces se critica la importacion y traduccion de ideas 'externas' porque desembocan en conceptualizaciones bastante incoherentes y confusas. Ademas, en lugar de evaluar detenidamente nuevas ideas y perspectivas en el contexto de debates continuos sobre el desarrollo regional, hay una tendencia a desviar las lineas actuales de debate y requerir nuevos 'giros' y 'perspectivas'. Sin minimizar la importancia de la innovacion conceptual, aqui buscamos una apreciacion mas solida de nuestra herencia conceptual. Si tomamos como punto de arranque la genealogia de una linea dominante de pensamiento en este campo, los 'Modelos de Innovacion Territorial', en este articulo analizamos como podriamos avanzar en el debate al usar ideas 'antiguas' y 'nuevas' (internas y externas) con respecto a los tres niveles analiticos principales en estudios regionales: micro, meso y macro. Se cree que las recientes ideas, particularmente sobre relacionalidad, son muy utiles a la hora de volver a valorar y definir el valor de los mas 'antiguos' enfoques macro estructuralistas e institucionalistas, y de situar la contribucion de debates mas recientes sobre el rol (micro) de cognicion y conocimiento. Finalmente, creemos que es necesaria una cuidadosa absorcion del trabajo sociologico para tener en cuenta el ambiente economico institucional mas extenso (meso) en el que funcionan las regiones. Estudios regionales Geografia economica Enfoque regulatorio Enfoques institucionales Enfoques cognitivos

Suggested Citation

  • Arnoud Lagendijk, 2006. "Learning from conceptual flow in regional studies: Framing present debates, unbracketing past debates," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(4), pages 385-399.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:40:y:2006:i:4:p:385-399
    DOI: 10.1080/00343400600725202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00343400600725202
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00343400600725202?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olivier Kramsch & Frans Boekema, 2002. "Breaking out of the ‘Isolated State’: Views on the Status and Future of Regional Science from a European Border Region," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 34(8), pages 1373-1393, August.
    2. Gordon MacLeod, 2001. "Beyond Soft Institutionalism: Accumulation, Regulation, and Their Geographical Fixes," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 33(7), pages 1145-1167, July.
    3. Meric S. Gertler, 2003. "Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or The undefinable tacitness of being (there)," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 3(1), pages 75-99, January.
    4. Michael Keating, 1998. "The New Regionalism in Western Europe," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 1193.
    5. Arnoud Lagendijk, 2003. "Towards Conceptual Quality in Regional Studies: The Need for Subtle Critique - A Response to Markusen," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(6-7), pages 719-727.
    6. Harald Bathelt & Andersand Malmberg & Peter Maskell, 2002. "Clusters and Knowledge Local Buzz, Global Pipelines and the Process of Knowledge Creation," DRUID Working Papers 02-12, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    7. Fabio Corno & Patrick Reinmoeller & Ikujiro Nonaka, 1999. "Knowledge Creation within Industrial Systems," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 3(4), pages 379-394, December.
    8. Ian R. Gordon & Philip McCann, 2000. "Industrial Clusters: Complexes, Agglomeration and/or Social Networks?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(3), pages 513-532, March.
    9. Andre Torre & Alain Rallet, 2005. "Proximity and Localization," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 47-59.
    10. Jamie Peck, 2005. "Economic Sociologies in Space," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 81(2), pages 129-175, April.
    11. Scott, Allen J, 2000. "Economic Geography: The Great Half-Century," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 24(4), pages 483-504, July.
    12. Frank Moulaert & Farid Sekia, 2003. "Territorial Innovation Models: A Critical Survey," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 289-302.
    13. Kevin Morgan, 2004. "The exaggerated death of geography: learning, proximity and territorial innovation systems," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 4(1), pages 3-21, January.
    14. Roberta Capello, 1999. "Spatial Transfer of Knowledge in High Technology Milieux: Learning Versus Collective Learning Processes," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 353-365.
    15. Kevin Morgan, 1997. "The Learning Region: Institutions, Innovation and Regional Renewal," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(5), pages 491-503.
    16. Lissoni, Francesco, 2001. "Knowledge codification and the geography of innovation: the case of Brescia mechanical cluster," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(9), pages 1479-1500, December.
    17. Arnoud Lagendijk, 2004. "Global ‘Lifeworlds’ Versus Local ‘Systemworlds’: How Flying Winemakers Produce Global Wines In Interconnected Locales," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 95(5), pages 511-526, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andy Pike, 2007. "Editorial: Whither Regional Studies?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(9), pages 1143-1148.
    2. Hansen , Teis & Coenen , Lars, 2013. "The Geography of Sustainability Transitions: A Literature Review," Papers in Innovation Studies 2013/39, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    3. Hugues Jeannerat, 2013. "Staging experience, valuing authenticity: Towards a market perspective on territorial development," GRET Publications and Working Papers 05-13, GRET Group of Research in Territorial Economy, University of Neuchâtel.
    4. Olivier Crevoisier & Hugues Jeannerat, 2009. "Territorial Knowledge Dynamics: From the Proximity Paradigm to Multi-location Milieus," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(8), pages 1223-1241, August.
    5. Hugues Jeannerat & Olivier Crevoisier, 2016. "Editorial: From 'Territorial Innovation Models' to 'Territorial Knowledge Dynamics': On the Learning Value of a New Concept in Regional Studies," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(2), pages 185-188, February.
    6. Olivier Crevoisier, 2014. "Beyond Territorial Innovation Models: The Pertinence of the Territorial Approach," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(3), pages 551-561, March.
    7. Maria Nowicka-Skowron & Piotr Pachura, 2010. "Theory Of Innovation In Spatial Perspective," Polish Journal of Management Studies, Czestochowa Technical University, Department of Management, vol. 1(1), pages 111-118, May.
    8. Coenen, Lars & Benneworth, Paul & Truffer, Bernhard, 2012. "Toward a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 968-979.
    9. Cassandra C Wang & George C S Lin & Guicai Li, 2010. "Industrial Clustering and Technological Innovation in China: New Evidence from the ICT Industry in Shenzhen," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(8), pages 1987-2010, August.
    10. Hugues Jeannerat & Leila Kebir, 2012. "Mobility of Knowledge. Knowledge resources and markets: What territorial economic systems ?," GRET Publications and Working Papers 02-12, GRET Group of Research in Territorial Economy, University of Neuchâtel.
    11. Kebir Leïla & Jeannerat Hugues, 2013. "Creativity, plasticity, quality: on the emergence of a new food offering in Paris," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 57(1-2), pages 27-38, October.
    12. Henry Wai‐Chung Yeung, 2009. "Transnational Corporations, Global Production Networks, and Urban and Regional Development: A Geographer's Perspective on Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 197-226, June.
    13. Hugo Pinto & Jorge André Guerreiro & Manuel Fernández-Esquinas, 2023. "Sources of knowledge in the firm: a review on influential, internal and contextual factors in innovation dynamics," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 1-32, February.
    14. Christian Livi & Hugues Jeannerat & Olivier Crevoisier, 2013. "Mobility of Knowledge. The Photovoltaic Industry in Western Switzerland : The Emergence of a Multi-Local Valuation Milieu," GRET Publications and Working Papers 04-13, GRET Group of Research in Territorial Economy, University of Neuchâtel.
    15. Delphine Guex, Olivier Crevoisier, 2017. "Post-industrial globalization and local milieus: A typology," Diskussionsschriften credresearchpaper15, Universitaet Bern, Departement Volkswirtschaft - CRED.
    16. Jun Zhang, 2011. "Related Variety, Global Connectivity and Institutional Embeddedness: Internet Development in Beijing and Shanghai Compared," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1110, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jun 2011.
    17. Olivier Crevoisier, 2016. "The Economic Value of Knowledge: Embodied in Goods or Embedded in Cultures?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(2), pages 189-201, February.
    18. Borsi, Balázs & Bajmócy, Zoltán, 2009. "Kvantitatív leszakadás, kvalitatív felzárkózás?. A hazai regionális innovációpolitika kihívásai [Quantitative lag, qualitative catch-up?. The challenges for this countrys regional innovation policy," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(10), pages 933-954.
    19. Olivier Crevoisier, 2011. "Territorial Knowledge dynamics and anchoring milieus in Europe," GRET Publications and Working Papers 08-11, GRET Group of Research in Territorial Economy, University of Neuchâtel.
    20. Yixi Xue & Jianxin You & Xingkun Liang & Hu-Chen Liu, 2016. "Adopting Strategic Niche Management to Evaluate EV Demonstration Projects in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-20, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christophe CARRINCAZEAUX (E3I-IFReDE-GRES) & Frédéric GASCHET (IERSO-IFReDE-GRES), 2006. "Knowledge and the diversity of innovation systems: a comparative analysis of European regions," Cahiers du GRES (2002-2009) 2006-29, Groupement de Recherches Economiques et Sociales.
    2. Allen Scott, 2006. "Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Industrial Development: Geography and the Creative Field Revisited," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 1-24, February.
    3. Fiorenza Belussi & Silvia R. Sedita, 2012. "Industrial Districts as Open Learning Systems: Combining Emergent and Deliberate Knowledge Structures," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(2), pages 165-184, April.
    4. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Riccardo Crescenzi, 2008. "Mountains in a flat world: why proximity still matters for the location of economic activity," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 1(3), pages 371-388.
    5. Max-Peter Menzel, 2008. "Dynamic Proximities – Changing Relations by Creating and Bridging Distances," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 0816, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Oct 2008.
    6. Macneill Stewart & Hugues Jeannerat, 2013. "Mobility of Knowledge. Territorial Knowledge Dynamics in luxury car industry. Beyond standard and production markets," GRET Publications and Working Papers 01-13, GRET Group of Research in Territorial Economy, University of Neuchâtel.
    7. Sara C. Santos Cruz & Aurora A.C. Teixeira, 2007. "A new look into the evolution of clusters literature. A bibliometric exercise," FEP Working Papers 257, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    8. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Fabrice Comptour, 2010. "Do clusters generate greater innovation and growth? An analysis of European regions," Working Papers 2010-15, Instituto Madrileño de Estudios Avanzados (IMDEA) Ciencias Sociales.
    9. Martin M�ller & Allison Stewart, 2016. "Does Temporary Geographical Proximity Predict Learning? Knowledge Dynamics in the Olympic Games," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(3), pages 377-390, March.
    10. Hugues Jeannerat & Leila Kebir, 2012. "Mobility of Knowledge. Knowledge resources and markets: What territorial economic systems ?," GRET Publications and Working Papers 02-12, GRET Group of Research in Territorial Economy, University of Neuchâtel.
    11. Al James, 2005. "Demystifying the role of culture in innovative regional economies," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(9), pages 1197-1216.
    12. Robert J. Stimson, 2014. "Proximity and endogenous regional development," Chapters, in: André Torre & Frédéric Wallet (ed.), Regional Development and Proximity Relations, chapter 1, pages 47-93, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Iammarino, Simona & McCann, Philip, 2006. "The structure and evolution of industrial clusters: Transactions, technology and knowledge spillovers," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 1018-1036, September.
    14. Fitjar, Rune Dahl & Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés, 2013. "Firm collaboration and modes of innovation in Norway," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 128-138.
    15. Evert-Jan Visser & Oedzge Atzema, 2007. "Beyond clusters: Fostering innovation through a differentiated and combined network approach," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 0705, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jun 2007.
    16. Roman Martin, 2012. "Measuring Knowledge Bases in Swedish Regions," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(9), pages 1569-1582, September.
    17. Roman Martin & Jan Ole Rypestøl, 2018. "Linking content and technology: on the geography of innovation networks in the Bergen media cluster," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(10), pages 966-989, November.
    18. Charlie Karlsson & Gunther Maier & Michaela Trippl & Iulia Siedschlag & Robert Owen & Gavin Murphy, 2008. "ICT Diffusion, Innovation Systems, Globalisation and Regional Economic Dynamics: Theory and Empirical Evidence," Papers WP233, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    19. Hugo Pinto & Jorge André Guerreiro & Manuel Fernández-Esquinas, 2023. "Sources of knowledge in the firm: a review on influential, internal and contextual factors in innovation dynamics," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 1-32, February.
    20. Rune Dahl Fitjar & Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, 2017. "Nothing is in the Air," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1), pages 22-39, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:40:y:2006:i:4:p:385-399. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.