IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Global Taxation Governance after the 2002 UN Monterrey Conference

Listed author(s):
  • Dries Lesage
Registered author(s):

    Over the past 10 years, global tax issues, such as inter-state tax competition, tax havens and the case for “global taxes”, have been receiving more attention than ever. During the preparation for the 2002 United Nations (UN) conference in Monterrey on Financing for Development, the UN considered international and domestic taxation as a vital component. The conference itself, however, did not yield many results on this point. In this context, some circles have made a case for an “International Tax Organization” (ITO). Our discussion of global taxation governance will be centred upon the ITO proposal. The most important argument put forward to support such a proposal is that it gives the South a real seat at the table in global tax governance. After having outlined the current architecture of global tax governance, four questions will be addressed. First, wherein lies the possible value-added of an ITO? Second, how has the idea thus far been received internationally? Third, what are the prospects for an ITO? Fourth, does the South really need an ITO to advance its fiscal interests? The paper analyses the political obstacles to the idea of an ITO, but also points at politically feasible alternative forms of South-South and North-South co-operation.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Oxford Development Studies.

    Volume (Year): 36 (2008)
    Issue (Month): 3 ()
    Pages: 281-294

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:taf:oxdevs:v:36:y:2008:i:3:p:281-294
    DOI: 10.1080/13600810802264415
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Web:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oxdevs:v:36:y:2008:i:3:p:281-294. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.