IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jdevef/v7y2015i4p453-461.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Closing the evaluation cycle

Author

Listed:
  • Miguel Szekely

Abstract

This paper argues that the incentives faced by different actors, and the way in which the evaluation function is organised in governments, can inhibit evaluation use. Three types of institutional arrangements for evaluation are identified in Latin America, and the advantages and challenges of the different models are discussed. Some examples of how countries have started to close the results-based management cycle under different arrangements are presented for Peru and Mexico.

Suggested Citation

  • Miguel Szekely, 2015. "Closing the evaluation cycle," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(4), pages 453-461, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jdevef:v:7:y:2015:i:4:p:453-461
    DOI: 10.1080/19439342.2015.1098718
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/19439342.2015.1098718
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/19439342.2015.1098718?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philip Davies, 2015. "Getting evidence into policy and practice," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(4), pages 393-401, December.
    2. Howard White & Hugh Waddington, 2012. "Why do we care about evidence synthesis? An introduction to the special issue on systematic reviews," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(3), pages 351-358, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Supriya Garikipati & Susan Johnson & Isabelle Guérin & Ariane Szafarz, 2017. "Microfinance and Gender: Issues, Challenges and The Road Ahead," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(5), pages 641-648, May.
    2. Anderson, Edward, 2020. "The impact of trade liberalisation on poverty and inequality: Evidence from CGE models," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 42(6), pages 1208-1227.
    3. Hansen, Henrik & Trifkovic, Neda, 2013. "Systematic Reviews: Questions, Methods and Usage," MPRA Paper 47993, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Simon Gwara & Edilegnaw Wale & Alfred Odindo & Chris Buckley, 2021. "Attitudes and Perceptions on the Agricultural Use of Human Excreta and Human Excreta Derived Materials: A Scoping Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-30, February.
    5. Saba Hinrichs-Krapels & Jocelyn Bailey & Harriet Boulding & Bobby Duffy & Rachel Hesketh & Emma Kinloch & Alexandra Pollitt & Sarah Rawlings & Armida Rij & Benedict Wilkinson & Ross Pow & Jonathan Gra, 2020. "Using Policy Labs as a process to bring evidence closer to public policymaking: a guide to one approach," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 1-9, December.
    6. Hoddinott, John, 2011. "Agriculture, health, and nutrition: Towards conceptualizing the linkages," 2020 conference papers 2, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    7. Graham McDowell & Eleanor Stephenson & James Ford, 2014. "Adaptation to climate change in glaciated mountain regions," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 126(1), pages 77-91, September.
    8. Zhaohui Su & Michael Mackert & Xiaoshan Li & Jiyoon (Karen) Han & Brittani Crook & Benjamin Wyeth, 2020. "“Study Natural” without Drugs: An Exploratory Study of Theory-Guided and Tailored Health Campaign Interventions to Prevent Nonmedical Use of Prescription Stimulants in College Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-15, June.
    9. Kiran M. Sarma & Sarah L. Carthy & Katie M. Cox, 2022. "PROTOCOL: Mental disorder, psychological problems and terrorist behaviour: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(2), June.
    10. Kiran M. Sarma & Sarah L. Carthy & Katie M. Cox, 2022. "Mental disorder, psychological problems and terrorist behaviour: A systematic review and meta‐analysis," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jdevef:v:7:y:2015:i:4:p:453-461. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJDE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.