IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Measuring results in development: the role of impact evaluation in agency-wide performance measurement systems

Listed author(s):
  • Richard Manning
  • Howard White

The need to demonstrate results has been growing over the last two decades. There is a growing recognition that outcome monitoring only tells us what happened, not why it happened, and so outcome monitoring cannot give useful information about the effectiveness of development interventions. Many agencies are turning to impact evaluations to assess the change in outcomes which may be attributed to their interventions. As more impact evaluations are produced, the question arises as to how these studies can be used to assess how the agency as a whole is performing. We discuss the 'triple A' principles for an Agency Wide Performance Measurement System (AWPMS) - alignment, attribution, and aggregation - as well as several other challenges faced in designing and implementing such systems: the balance between lesson learning and accountability, independence versus influence, modifying incentive structures for results, determining how many impact evaluations to conduct and of what, and ensuring the use of these studies. We conclude by urging greater cooperation between those charged with measuring results and those conducting impact evaluations in order to develop AWPMS which can meaningfully report on agency performance.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/19439342.2014.989673
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Journal of Development Effectiveness.

Volume (Year): 6 (2014)
Issue (Month): 4 (December)
Pages: 337-349

as
in new window

Handle: RePEc:taf:jdevef:v:6:y:2014:i:4:p:337-349
DOI: 10.1080/19439342.2014.989673
Contact details of provider: Web page: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJDE20

Order Information: Web: http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RJDE20

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jdevef:v:6:y:2014:i:4:p:337-349. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.