IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eujhet/v7y2000i4p485-506.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tozer on machinery

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Gehrke

Abstract

This paper examines John Edward Tozer's mathematical treatment of the classical approach to the machinery problem and his discussion of some arithmetical examples that had been presented by Barton, Sismondi, McCulloch and Ricardo. It is shown that Tozer (1) made a genuine contribution to the contemporary debates on the machinery issue, (2) anticipated modern formulations of the problem of the choice of technique, and (3) revealed a puzzling inconsistency in Ricardo's argument in the famous chapter 'On Machinery'.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Gehrke, 2000. "Tozer on machinery," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(4), pages 485-506.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:eujhet:v:7:y:2000:i:4:p:485-506
    DOI: 10.1080/09672560050210089
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09672560050210089
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09672560050210089?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Henderson, James P, 1985. "The Whewell Group of Mathematical Economists," The Manchester School of Economic & Social Studies, University of Manchester, vol. 53(4), pages 404-431, December.
    2. Rashid, Salim, 1977. "William Whewell and Early Mathematical Economics," The Manchester School of Economic & Social Studies, University of Manchester, vol. 45(4), pages 381-391, December.
    3. Heinz D. Kurz & Neri Salvadori (ed.), 1998. "The Elgar Companion to Classical Economics," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, volume 0, number 851.
    4. Kurz,Heinz D. & Salvadori,Neri, 1997. "Theory of Production," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521588676, June.
    5. Campanelli, Giuliana, 1982. "W. Whewell's Contribution to Economic Analysis: The First Mathematical Formulation of Fixed Capital in Ricardo's System," The Manchester School of Economic & Social Studies, University of Manchester, vol. 50(3), pages 248-265, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giovanni Scarano, 2013. "Capital accumulation and technical conditions along sustainable growth paths," Departmental Working Papers of Economics - University 'Roma Tre' 0182, Department of Economics - University Roma Tre.
    2. Witt, Ulrich, 2005. "'Production' in nature and production in the economy--second thoughts about some basic economic concepts," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 165-179, June.
    3. Neri Salvadori & Rodolfo Signorino, 2014. "Adam Smith on Monopoly Theory. Making good a lacuna," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 61(2), pages 178-195, May.
    4. Mariolis, Theodore, 2018. "Μεσότητα Και «Τρίτος Άνθρωπος» Στην Αριστοτελίζουσα Θεωρία Των Ανταλλακτικών Αξιών [Mean and “Third Man Argument” in the Aristotelian Theory of Exchange Values]," MPRA Paper 86521, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Heinz Kurz & Neri Salvadori, 2000. "'Classical' Roots of Input-Output Analysis: A Short Account of its Long Prehistory," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 153-179.
    6. Akhabbar, Amanar & Lallement, Jérôme, 2010. "Wassily Leontief and Léon Walras: the Production as a Circular Flow," MPRA Paper 30207, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Vivian Walsh, 2000. "Smith After Sen," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 5-25.
    8. Heinz D. Kurz & Neri Salvadori, 2011. "In Favor of Rigor and Relevance: A Reply to Mark Blaug," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 43(3), pages 607-616, Fall.
    9. Signorino, Rodolfo, 2011. "David Ricardo on natural and market prices," MPRA Paper 39212, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Kenji Mori, 2010. "Charasoff and Dmitriev: An Analytical Characterisation of Origins of Linear Economics," TERG Discussion Papers 249, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Tohoku University.
    11. Geoff C. Harcourt & Peter Kriesler, 2014. "On Ricardo and Cambridge," Discussion Papers 2014-04, School of Economics, The University of New South Wales.
    12. Mariolis, Theodore, 2006. "A Critique of the ‘New Approach’ to the Transformation Problem and a Proposal," MPRA Paper 24019, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Fabio Ravagnani, 1999. "On a current characterization of the classical theory of value," Working Papers in Public Economics 39, Department of Economics and Law, Sapienza University of Roma.
    14. Alberto Quadrio Curzio, 2011. "Resources and Economic Dynamics, Technology and Rents," CRANEC - Working Papers del Centro di Ricerche in Analisi economica e sviluppo economico internazionale crn1102, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Centro di Ricerche in Analisi economica e sviluppo economico internazionale (CRANEC).
    15. David Laibman, 2001. "Non-constant Returns, Pareto Optimality and Competitive Equilibrium," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 471-481.
    16. Kazuhiro Kurose, 2022. "A two-class economy from the multi-sectoral perspective: the controversy between Pasinetti and Meade–Hahn–Samuelson–Modigliani revisited," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 239-270, April.
    17. Massimo Cingolani, 2015. "Sylos Labini su Marx: implicazioni per la politica economica (Sylos Labini on Marx: economic policy implications)," Moneta e Credito, Economia civile, vol. 68(269), pages 81-147.
    18. Keiran Sharpe, 2006. "Effective demand in a stylised Keynesian model of growth," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 173-191.
    19. Rodolfo Signorino, 2003. "Book Reviews," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 339-370.
    20. Giorgio Giorgi, 2022. "Nonsingular M-matrices: a Tour in the Various Characterizations and in Some Related Classes," DEM Working Papers Series 206, University of Pavia, Department of Economics and Management.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eujhet:v:7:y:2000:i:4:p:485-506. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REJH20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.