Extreme risk measures for REITs: a comparison among alternative methods
Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), traditionally known as an asset of low volatility, have been undergoing a period of unprecedentedly high volatility due to the current financial crisis. This has increased the need to search for appropriate methods to cope with extreme risks. This study aims to meet this need by comparing the performances of several commonly used methods in predicting the conditional Value at Risk (VaR) and Expected Shortfall (ES) for REITs. Our competing methods cover all three broad categories (i.e. nonparametric, parametric and semiparametric) classified by Manganelli and Engle (2004) and display a varying degree of complexity. Overall, our results show that the trio of EGARCH skewed t (EGARCH, Exponential Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedacity), GARCH t , and GARCH EVT (EVT, Extreme Value Theory) provide the most reliable forecasts among all methods considered. Their good performance, with only a few exceptions, holds up for a variety of quantiles and is robust to the size of the moving window used to make the forecasts. We also find that GARCH normal and RiskMetrics of J.P. Morgan are the worst performers. Filtered Historical Simulation (FHS) models fall somewhere in between.
Volume (Year): 22 (2012)
Issue (Month): 2 (January)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAFE20|
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RAFE20|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apfiec:v:22:y:2012:i:2:p:113-126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.