IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/accted/v16y2007i3p225-240.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Publish or Perish: Is this Really a Viable Set of Options?

Author

Listed:
  • M. R. Mathews

Abstract

This paper examines publishing patterns amongst Australian accounting academics over the period 1999-2003. The number of potential publications is estimated by reference to the existing academic staff, their status and qualifications. An estimate of 400 potential publications per year was calculated. This was compared with the actual output of the best-known Australian based accounting journals over the period 1999-2003, calculated at about 60 articles per year. Clearly, a sudden increase in output to the level that ought to be taking place would place a strain on the system. One possible method of recognising publishable research output, regardless of space available for the work to be published, would be for an independent 'panel of referees' to award the status of 'worthy of publication in a learned journal' to research output in order to assist the academic staff in gaining appropriate recognition and reward, avoiding the simple dichotomy that currently faces many academics to publish or to perish, making an on-line publication after review by a national body of referees an alternative journal publication.

Suggested Citation

  • M. R. Mathews, 2007. "Publish or Perish: Is this Really a Viable Set of Options?," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 225-240.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:accted:v:16:y:2007:i:3:p:225-240
    DOI: 10.1080/09639280701430017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09639280701430017
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09639280701430017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Markus J. Milne, 2002. "The construction of journal quality: no engagement detected," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 72-86, March.
    2. Brown, L. D. & Gardner, J. C. & Vasarhelyi, M. A., 1987. "An analysis of the research contributions of accounting, organizations and society, 1976-1984," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 193-204, March.
    3. Alan Lowe & Joanne Locke, 2002. "Angst and hubris but no critique detected," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 87-95, March.
    4. Rob Gray & James Guthrie & Lee Parker, 2002. "Rites of passage and the self‐immolation of academic accounting labour: an essay exploring exclusivity versus mutuality in accounting scholarship," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 1-30, March.
    5. Lawrence D. Brown & Ronald J. Huefner, 1994. "The Familiarity with and Perceived Quality of Accounting Journals: Views of Senior Accounting Faculty in Leading U.S. MBA Programs," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(1), pages 223-250, June.
    6. Joanne Locke & Alan Lowe, 2002. "Problematising the construction of journal quality: an engagement with the mainstream," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 45-71, March.
    7. Cheryl L. Maranto & Carolyn A. Streuly, 1994. "The Determinants of Accounting Professors' Publishing Productivity—The Early Career," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(2), pages 387-407, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Russell J. Craig, 2007. "Towards an Ethos of Advancing Knowledge: A Commentary on 'Publish or Perish: Is this Really a Viable Set of Options?'," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 245-249.
    2. Richard A. Bernardi & Kimberly A. Zamojcin & Taylor L. Delande, 2016. "Ranking accounting authors and departments in accounting education: different methodologies – significantly different results," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(6), pages 568-597, November.
    3. Jayne Bisman & Weini Liao, 2009. "Making the mainstream," Asian Review of Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 17(3), pages 180-197, September.
    4. Lesley Stainbank, 2007. "A Commentary on 'Publish or Perish: Is this Really a Viable Set of Options?'," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 263-266.
    5. Dennis M. Bline, 2007. "A Commentary on 'Publish or Perish: Is this Really a Viable Set of Options?'," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 241-244.
    6. Apostolou, Barbara & Hassell, John M. & Rebele, James E. & Watson, Stephanie F., 2010. "Accounting education literature review (2006–2009)," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 145-197.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hussain, Simon, 2010. "Accounting journals and the ABS quality ratings," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 1-16.
    2. Catriona Paisey & Nicholas Paisey, 2005. "The research assessment exercise 2001—insights and implications for accounting education research in the UK," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 411-426.
    3. Lowe, Alan & Locke, Joanne, 2006. "Constructing an ‘efficient frontier’ of accounting journal quality," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 321-341.
    4. Lowe, Alan & Locke, Joanne, 2005. "Perceptions of journal quality and research paradigm: results of a web-based survey of British accounting academics," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 81-98, January.
    5. Geert Campenhout & Tom Caneghem & Steve Uytbergen, 2008. "A comparison of overall and sub-area journal influence: The case of the accounting literature," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 77(1), pages 61-90, October.
    6. Wade D. Cook & Tal Raviv & Alan J. Richardson, 2010. "Aggregating Incomplete Lists of Journal Rankings: An Application to Academic Accounting Journals," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(3), pages 217-235, September.
    7. Bonner, Sarah E. & Hesford, James W. & Van der Stede, Wim A. & Young, S. Mark, 2006. "The most influential journals in academic accounting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(7), pages 663-685, October.
    8. Williams, Paul F. & Jenkins, J. Gregory & Ingraham, Laura, 2006. "The winnowing away of behavioral accounting research in the US: The process for anointing academic elites," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 783-818, November.
    9. Claudio Romano & Janek Ratnatunga, 1996. "A Citation Analysis of the Impact of Journals on Contemporary Small Enterprise Research," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 20(3), pages 7-21, April.
    10. Ratnatunga, Janek & Romano, Claudio, 1997. "A "citation classics" analysis of articles in contemporary small enterprise research," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 197-212, May.
    11. S. Douglas Beets & Andrea S. Kelton & Bruce R. Lewis, 2015. "An assessment of accounting journal quality based on departmental lists," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(1), pages 315-332, January.
    12. Andrikopoulos, Andreas & Kostaris, Konstantinos, 2017. "Collaboration networks in accounting research," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 1-9.
    13. Vivien Beattie & Alan Goodacre, 2006. "A new method for ranking academic journals in accounting and finance," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(2), pages 65-91.
    14. Jones, M. J. & Brinn, T. & Pendlebury, M., 1996. "Judging the quality of research in business schools: A comment from accounting," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 24(5), pages 597-602, October.
    15. Carmona, Salvador & Gutiérrez, Isabel, 1998. "Vogues in management accounting research," DEE - Working Papers. Business Economics. WB 6545, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía de la Empresa.
    16. Christopher Humphrey, 2005. "'In the aftermath of crisis: Reflections on the principles, values and significance of academic inquiry in accounting': Introduction," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 341-351.
    17. Stewart Jones & Nurul Alam, 2019. "A machine learning analysis of citation impact among selected Pacific Basin journals," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 59(4), pages 2509-2552, December.
    18. repec:dau:papers:123456789/8741 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Chad Albrecht & Jeffery Thompson & Jeffrey Hoopes & Pablo Rodrigo, 2010. "Business Ethics Journal Rankings as Perceived by Business Ethics Scholars," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 95(2), pages 227-237, August.
    20. Meyer, Matthias & Waldkirch, Rüdiger W. & Duscher, Irina & Just, Alexander, 2018. "Drivers of citations: An analysis of publications in “top” accounting journals," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 24-46.
    21. Bernard Raffournier & Alain Schatt, 2010. "Is European Accounting Research Fairly Reflected in Academic Journals? An Investigation of Possible Non-mainstream and Language Barrier Biases," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 161-190.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:accted:v:16:y:2007:i:3:p:225-240. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAED20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.