IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ssi/jouesi/v9y2021i2p134-151.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparative study of institutional factors influencing entrepreneurial activities: a case study of Egypt and Saudi Arabia

Author

Listed:
  • Lobna S. Sorour

    (Arab Academy for Science Technology & Maritime Transport, Egypt)

  • Mohamed A. Ragheb

    (Arab Academy for Science Technology & Maritime Transport, Egypt)

  • Nevien Khourshed

    (Arab Academy for Science Technology & Maritime Transport, Egypt)

Abstract

Researches on entrepreneurship and business enterprise concerning developing nations have normally explored the manners by which, culture, politics, or economic institutions disallow or empower entrepreneurial exercises utilizing macro-level surveys and deductive designs. Accordingly, this research aims to evaluate the extent of the contribution of institutional factors and governmental policies, as well as evaluate their impact on entrepreneurial activities, which in turn leads to the economic development of countries at all levels. Such a study is important to provide a measurement of the impact of Institutional Factors (Cognitive, Regulative, and Normative) on the Entrepreneurial Activities (Service Innovation, Corporate Venturing, and Strategic Renewal) in Egypt and Saudi Arabia (KSA) with measuring the moderation role of personal profile (gender, age, and education). The research approach adopted in this dissertation includes quantitative primary data from a questionnaire collected from 404 respondents from Egypt and 409 respondents from Saudi Arabia. Results showed that there is a significant relationship between Institutional Factors and entrepreneurial activities in both countries and.

Suggested Citation

  • Lobna S. Sorour & Mohamed A. Ragheb & Nevien Khourshed, 2021. "A comparative study of institutional factors influencing entrepreneurial activities: a case study of Egypt and Saudi Arabia," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 9(2), pages 134-151, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:9:y:2021:i:2:p:134-151
    DOI: 10.9770/jesi.2021.9.2(9)
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/uploads/articles/34/Sorour_A_comparative_study_of_institutional_factors_influencing_entrepreneurial_activities_a_case_study_of_Egypt_and_Saudi_Arabia.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/905
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.9770/jesi.2021.9.2(9)?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elisabet Ferri & David Urbano, 2010. "Environmental Factors and Social Entrepreneurship," Working Papers 1003, Departament Empresa, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, revised Sep 2010.
    2. Janna Alvedalen & Ron Boschma, 2017. "A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: towards a future research agenda," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(6), pages 887-903, June.
    3. Baker, Ted & Welter, Friederike, 2018. "Contextual Entrepreneurship: An Interdisciplinary Perspective," Foundations and Trends(R) in Entrepreneurship, now publishers, vol. 14(4), pages 357-426, July.
    4. Aparicio, Sebastian & Urbano, David & Audretsch, David, 2016. "Institutional factors, opportunity entrepreneurship and economic growth: Panel data evidence," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 45-61.
    5. Yana Borissenko & Ron Boschma, 2016. "A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems: towards a future research agenda," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1630, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Nov 2016.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bruno Fischer & Paola Rücker Schaeffer & Sérgio Queiroz, 2019. "High-growth entrepreneurship in a developing country: Regional systems or stochastic process?," Contaduría y Administración, Accounting and Management, vol. 64(1), pages 59-60, Enero-Mar.
    2. Anthony Sinyangwe & Bruce Mwiya & John Lungu, 2024. "Effects of Regulatory Environment on the Performance of Small-Scale Mining Enterprises: Evidence from Zambia," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(8), pages 3429-3446, August.
    3. Komlósi, Éva & Sebestyén, Tamás & Tóth-Pajor, Ákos & Bedő, Zsolt, 2022. "Do specific entrepreneurial ecosystems favor high-level networking while others not? Lessons from the Hungarian IT sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    4. Uwe Cantner & James A. Cunningham & Erik E. Lehmann & Matthias Menter, 2021. "Entrepreneurial ecosystems: a dynamic lifecycle model," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 407-423, June.
    5. Johannes Bloh & Tom Broekel & Burcu Özgun & Rolf Sternberg, 2020. "New(s) data for entrepreneurship research? An innovative approach to use Big Data on media coverage," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 673-694, October.
    6. Charis Vlados & Dimos Chatzinikolaou, 2019. "Business ecosystems policy in Stra.Tech.Man terms: The case of the Eastern Macedonia and Thrace region," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 15(3), pages 163-197.
    7. Francesco Ceresia & Claudio Mendola, 2019. "The Effects of Corruption in Entrepreneurial Ecosystems on Entrepreneurial Intentions," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-14, November.
    8. Inés Ruiz-Rosa & Desiderio Gutiérrez-Taño & Francisco J. García-Rodríguez, 2020. "Social Entrepreneurial Intention and the Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic: A Structural Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-17, August.
    9. Rolf Sternberg, 2022. "Entrepreneurship and geography—some thoughts about a complex relationship," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 69(3), pages 559-584, December.
    10. Guo-Hua Cao & Jing Zhang, 2021. "Is a sustainable loop of economy and entrepreneurial ecosystem possible? a structural perspective," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 7002-7040, May.
    11. Jana Schmutzler & Veneta Andonova & Jonathan Perez-Lopez, 2021. "The role of diaspora in opportunity-driven entrepreneurial ecosystems: A mixed-methods study of Balkan economies," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 693-729, June.
    12. Reypens, Lina & Bacq, Sophie & Milanov, Hana, 2021. "Beyond bricolage: Early-stage technology venture resource mobilization in resource-scarce contexts," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(4).
    13. Kuebart, Andreas & Ibert, Oliver, 2019. "Beyond territorial conceptions of entrepreneurial ecosystems: The dynamic spatiality of knowledge brokering in seed accelerators," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 63(2-4), pages 118-133.
    14. Attila Lajos Makai, 2021. "Startup Ecosystem Rankings," Papers 2112.11931, arXiv.org.
    15. Piñeiro-Chousa, Juan & López-Cabarcos, M. Ángeles & Romero-Castro, Noelia María & Pérez-Pico, Ada María, 2020. "Innovation, entrepreneurship and knowledge in the business scientific field: Mapping the research front," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 475-485.
    16. Wei, Yifan, 2022. "Reprint of: Regional governments and opportunity entrepreneurship in underdeveloped institutional environments: An entrepreneurial ecosystem perspective," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(9).
    17. Muhamadu Awal Kindzeka Wirajing & Tii N. Nchofoung & Roger Tsafack Nanfosso, 2024. "Inclusive education and labour productivity: The case of Sub‐Saharan African countries," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 92(4), pages 498-523, December.
    18. Abootorabi, Hooman & Wiklund, Johan & Johnson, Alan R. & Miller, Cameron D., 2021. "A holistic approach to the evolution of an entrepreneurial ecosystem: An exploratory study of academic spin-offs," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(5).
    19. James A. Cunningham & Matthias Menter & Katharine Wirsching, 2019. "Entrepreneurial ecosystem governance: a principal investigator-centered governance framework," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 545-562, February.
    20. Luca Farè & David B. Audretsch & Marcus Dejardin, 2023. "Does democracy foster entrepreneurship?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 61(4), pages 1461-1495, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    institutional factors; cognitive dimension; regulative dimension; normative dimension; entrepreneurial activities; service innovation; corporate venturing; strategic renewal;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
    • O35 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Social Innovation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:9:y:2021:i:2:p:134-151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Manuela Tvaronaviciene (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.