IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ssi/jouesi/v8y2020i2p682-697.html

Impact of R&D expenditures on the country's innovative potential: a case study

Author

Listed:
  • Ardak Nurpeisova

    (S. Seifullin Kazakh Agro Technical University, Kazakhstan)

  • Galiya Mauina

    (S. Seifullin Kazakh Agro Technical University, Kazakhstan)

  • Shakizada Niyazbekova

    (Moscow Witte University, Russian Federation)

  • Ainur Jumagaliyeva

    (S. Seifullin Kazakh Agro Technical University, Kazakhstan)

  • Aigul Zholmukhanova

    (S. Seifullin Kazakh Agro Technical University, Kazakhstan)

  • Yuliya Gabdrashitovna Tyurina

    (Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Russian Federation)

  • Svetlana Murtuzalieva

    (Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Russian Federation)

  • Leila A. Maisigova

    (Ingush State University, Russian Federation)

Abstract

Kazakhstan has all the prerequisites for the formation of innovative potential. However, to ensure the innovative economic development of Kazakhstan, it is necessary to create favorable conditions that promote the commercialization of innovations. Otherwise, all expenditures that are currently primarily of a state nature will not have the required economic indicators. The modern theory of sustainable economic growth is based on the concept of innovation. That is why the main indicators of overall economic development depend on innovative development. The article studies the variability of a data group formed from indicators of innovative development of the economy of Kazakhstan, using one of the methods of reducing dimension as a correlation analysis. The data of 2000–2018 are analyzed, that is, for 19 years. Discusses the correlation analysis of indicators characterizing the amount of research and development costs and gross domestic product. The obtained correlation coefficients demonstrate a strong linear relationship between the selected indicators. The statistical analysis showed: patterns of change in the GDP of the economy internal R&D costs are almost identical, correlation-regression model of the impact of GDP on domestic R&D expenditures. That is, the number of innovatively active enterprises and internal R&D costs are interdependent variables with a close correlation. High correlation coefficients between the registration of patent applications and the grant of patents in Kazakhstan and the number of employees performing R&D. A strong but negative relationship between the number of organizations performing research and development and the rest, perhaps some organizations exist only nominally and their economic activity is minimal.

Suggested Citation

  • Ardak Nurpeisova & Galiya Mauina & Shakizada Niyazbekova & Ainur Jumagaliyeva & Aigul Zholmukhanova & Yuliya Gabdrashitovna Tyurina & Svetlana Murtuzalieva & Leila A. Maisigova, 2020. "Impact of R&D expenditures on the country's innovative potential: a case study," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(2), pages 682-697, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:8:y:2020:i:2:p:682-697
    DOI: 10.9770/jesi.2020.8.2(41)
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/uploads/articles/30/Nurpeisova_Impact_of_RD_expenditures_on_the_countrys_innovative_potential_a_case_study.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/723
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.9770/jesi.2020.8.2(41)?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhanna Tsaurkubule & Zhaxat Kenzhin & Dana Bekniyazova & Gulmira Bayandina & Gulsara Dyussembekova, 2020. "Assessment of competitiveness of regions of the Republic of Kazakhstan," Post-Print hal-02569361, HAL.
    2. Jurijs Baltgailis, 2019. "The issues of increasing the effectiveness of teaching comparative economics," Insights into Regional Development, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 1(3), pages 190-199, September.
    3. Ulrich Witt & Christian Zellner, 2009. "How firm organizations adapt to secure a sustained knowledge transfer," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(7), pages 647-661.
    4. Cohen, Wesley M & Levinthal, Daniel A, 1989. "Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 99(397), pages 569-596, September.
    5. Zhanna Tsaurkubule & Zhaxat Kenzhin & Dana Bekniyazova & Gulmira Bayandina & Gulsara Dyussembekova, 2020. "Assessment of competitiveness of regions of the Republic of Kazakhstan," Insights into Regional Development, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 2(1), pages 469-479, March.
    6. Damanpour, Fariborz & Aravind, Deepa, 2012. "Managerial Innovation: Conceptions, Processes and Antecedents," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(2), pages 423-454, July.
    7. Jurijs Baltgailis, 2019. "The issues of increasing the effectiveness of teaching comparative economics," Post-Print hal-02188839, HAL.
    8. Fariborz Damanpour & Deepa Aravind, 2012. "Managerial Innovation: Conceptions, Processes, and Antecedents," Management and Organization Review, The International Association for Chinese Management Research, vol. 8(2), pages 423-454, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shakizada Niyazbekova & Zeinegul Yessymkhanova & Seyit Kerimkhulle & Natalya Brovkina & Nataliya Annenskaya & Alexander Semenov & Diana Burkaltseva & Ardak Nurpeisova & Leila Maisigova & Vasiliy Varzi, 2022. "Assessment of Regional and Sectoral Parameters of Energy Supply in the Context of Effective Implementation of Kazakhstan’s Energy Policy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-14, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dimakopoulou, A.G. & Gkypali, A. & Tsekouras, K., 2024. "Technological and non-technological innovation synergies under the lens of absorptive capacity efficiency," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    2. Apanasovich, Natalja & Alcalde Heras, Henar & Parrilli, Mario Davide, 2016. "The impact of business innovation modes on SME innovation performance in post-Soviet transition economies: The case of Belarus," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 57, pages 30-40.
    3. Dung Nguyen‐Van & Chia‐Hua Chang, 2021. "Internationalization and product innovation in ASEAN: The moderating role of organizational innovation," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(2), pages 437-462, March.
    4. Rachel Bocquet & Sandra Dubouloz, 2020. "Firm Openness and Managerial Innovation: Rebalancing Deliberate Actions and Institutional Pressures," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 43-74.
    5. Lai, Kee-hung & Feng, Yunting & Zhu, Qinghua, 2023. "Digital transformation for green supply chain innovation in manufacturing operations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    6. Sagyngali Seitzhanov & Nurlan Kurmanov & Mariana Petrova & Ulukbek Aliyev & Nazgul Aidargaliyeva, 2020. "Stimulation of entrepreneurs' innovative activity: evidence from Kazakhstan," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(4), pages 2615-2629, June.
    7. Andreas Kallmuenzer & Ursula Scholl-Grissemann, 2017. "Disentangling antecedents and performance effects of family SME innovation: A knowledge-based perspective," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 1117-1138, December.
    8. Roza Shokan & Ainur Karipova & Aizhan Khoich & Gulmira Kabdullina & Nuradin Kudaibergenov & Gaukhar Niyetalina, 2019. "Economic levers of regulation of entrepreneurship," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(2), pages 1567-1581, December.
    9. Azzeddine Allioui, 2025. "Exploring the Balanced Scorecard as an Innovation for Performance Optimization in Moroccan Family Businesses," RAIS Conference Proceedings 2022-2026 0564, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies.
    10. Naciba Haned & Caroline Mothe & Thuc Uyen Nguyen-Thi, 2014. "Firm persistence in technological innovation: the relevance of organizational innovation," Post-Print halshs-01496526, HAL.
    11. Zhanibek Zhartay & Zhibek Khussainova & Baurzhan Yessengeldin, 2020. "Development of the youth entrepreneurship: example of Kazakhstan," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(1), pages 1190-1208, September.
    12. Ravil Akhmadeev & Alexander Redkin & Nadezda Glubokova & Olga Bykanova & Liubov Malakhova & Anatoly Rogov, 2019. "Agro-industrial cluster: supporting the food security of the developing market economy," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(2), pages 1149-1170, December.
    13. Gianluca Misuraca & Clelia Colombo & Csaba Kucsera & Stephanie Carretero & Margherita Bacigalupo & Raluca Radescu, 2015. "ICT-enabled Social Innovation in support of the Implementation of the Social Investment Package (IESI) - Mapping and Analysis of ICT-enabled Social Innovation Initiatives promoting Social Investment through Integrated Approaches to the Provision of S," JRC Research Reports JRC97467, Joint Research Centre.
    14. Ganter, Alois & Hecker, Achim, 2014. "Configurational paths to organizational innovation: qualitative comparative analyses of antecedents and contingencies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(6), pages 1285-1292.
    15. Dimitrios Kafetzopoulos & Evangelos Psomas, 2016. "ORGANISATIONAL LEARNING, NON-TECHNICAL INNOVATION AND CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF SMEs," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(03), pages 1-28, April.
    16. Walker, Richard M. & Chen, Jiyao & Aravind, Deepa, 2015. "Management innovation and firm performance: An integration of research findings," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 407-422.
    17. Xu, Yong & Zhao, Xin & Wang, Jian & Xie, Peijun, 2023. "Clarifying the dispute of corporate social responsibility: Evidence from green technological innovation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    18. Yu, Chuanpeng & Wang, Yue & Li, Tianchen & Lin, Chunpei, 2022. "Do top management teams’ expectations and support drive management innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 88-99.
    19. Ludivine Calamel & Denis Chabault, 2020. "The Role of Proximities in the Construction of Managerial Innovation in a Collaborative Context," Post-Print hal-04446126, HAL.
    20. Nohayla Badrane & Zineb Bamousse, 2025. "Innovative Financing Solutions: A Transformative Driver for Financial Performance of Businesses in Morocco [Les Nouvelles Voies de Financement Novatrices: Vecteur de Changement Transformateur vers la Performance Financière des Entreprises au Maroc," Post-Print hal-04956625, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • O10 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - General
    • O20 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - General
    • O30 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:8:y:2020:i:2:p:682-697. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Manuela Tvaronaviciene (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.