IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ssi/jouesi/v7y2020i4p2818-2831.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The influence of corporate governance mechanism on the integrated financial reporting and investment risk of Thai listed companies

Author

Listed:
  • Sarapee Chanatup

    (Suratthani Rajabhat University, Thailand)

  • Somnuk Aujirapongpan

    (Walailak University, Thailand)

  • Supit Ritkaew

    (Walailak University, Thailand)

Abstract

This study was to examine relationships between corporate governance mechanism, integrated financial reporting, and investment risk on the stock exchange in Thailand. This study has investigated determinants and consequences of integrated financial reporting by analyzing Form 56-1 for year-end 2015 of the 240 Thai listed firms. To examine the relationship, an integrated financial reporting checklist was developed to identify the level of integrated reporting of listed firms on the Stock Exchange of Thailand. An index was based on seven dimensions of the International Integrated Reporting Framework. An integrated financial reporting is then analyzed using content analysis. An integrated financial reporting and corporate governance mechanism were collected from Form 56-1 for year-end 2015. Investment risk data was collected from SETSMART database. The analysis was conducted using structural equation modeling (SEM). The statistical results from factor analysis found that all seven dimensions are appropriate measurements of integrated financial reporting. The empirical result is that positive relationships were found for stakeholder-oriented corporate governance mechanism, shareholder-oriented corporate governance mechanism and integrated financial reporting; integrated financial reporting and investment risk. The model identified mediating relationship of integrated financial reporting between shareholder-oriented corporate governance mechanism and investment risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarapee Chanatup & Somnuk Aujirapongpan & Supit Ritkaew, 2020. "The influence of corporate governance mechanism on the integrated financial reporting and investment risk of Thai listed companies," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(4), pages 2818-2831, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:7:y:2020:i:4:p:2818-2831
    DOI: 10.9770/jesi.2020.7.4(16)
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/uploads/articles/28/Chanatup_The_influence_of_corporate_governance_mechanism_on_the_integrated_financial_reporting_and_investment_risk_of_Thai_listed_companies.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/555
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.9770/jesi.2020.7.4(16)?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fama, Eugene F, 1980. "Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 88(2), pages 288-307, April.
    2. Marco Allegrini & Giulio Greco, 2013. "Corporate boards, audit committees and voluntary disclosure: evidence from Italian Listed Companies," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 17(1), pages 187-216, February.
    3. Williamson, Oliver E, 1981. "The Modern Corporation: Origins, Evolution, Attributes," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 19(4), pages 1537-1568, December.
    4. Mohammad Jizi & Aly Salama & Robert Dixon & Rebecca Stratling, 2014. "Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Evidence from the US Banking Sector," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 125(4), pages 601-615, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sumaia Ayesh Qaderi & Belal Ali Abdulraheem Ghaleb & Abdulwahid Ahmed Hashed & Sitraselvi Chandren & Zaimah Abdullah, 2022. "Board Characteristics and Integrated Reporting Strategy: Does Sustainability Committee Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-24, May.
    2. Sunday Oseiweh Ogbeide & Henry Usunobun Ogiugo & Isaac Olufemi Adesuyi, 2021. "Corporate governance mechanisms and financial reporting quality of commercial banks in Nigeria," Post-Print hal-03583879, HAL.
    3. Sunday Oseiweh Ogbeide & Henry Usunobun Ogiugo & Isaac Olufemi Adesuyi, 2021. "Corporate governance mechanisms and financial reporting quality of commercial banks in Nigeria," Insights into Regional Development, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 3(1), pages 136-146, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Al-Najjar, Basil & Salama, Aly, 2022. "Mind the gap: Are female directors and executives more sensitive to the environment in high-tech us firms?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    2. Ahmed A. Elamer & Collins G. Ntim & Hussein A. Abdou & Alaa Mansour Zalata & Mohamed Elmagrhi, 2019. "The impact of multi-layer governance on bank risk disclosure in emerging markets: the case of Middle East and North Africa," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(2), pages 246-281, April.
    3. Melinda Cahyaning Ratri & Iman Harymawan & Khairul Anuar Kamarudin, 2021. "Busyness, Tenure, Meeting Frequency of the CEOs, and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-22, May.
    4. Kaouther Chebbi & Mohammed Abdullah Ammer, 2022. "Board Composition and ESG Disclosure in Saudi Arabia: The Moderating Role of Corporate Governance Reforms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, September.
    5. Sally Mohammed Farghaly Abdelaliem & Khalid M. Alharbi & Nadiah A. Baghdadi & Amer Malki, 2023. "Exploring the Impact of Private Companies’ Participation in Health-Related Programs through Corporate Sustainable Reporting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, March.
    6. Booth, James R. & Cornett, Marcia Millon & Tehranian, Hassan, 2002. "Boards of directors, ownership, and regulation," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(10), pages 1973-1996, October.
    7. Mohammad Jizi, 2017. "The Influence of Board Composition on Sustainable Development Disclosure," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(5), pages 640-655, July.
    8. Aladdin Dwekat & Elies Seguí‐Mas & Guillermina Tormo‐Carbó & Pedro Carmona, 2020. "Corporate Governance Configurations and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Audit Committee and Board characteristics," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 2879-2892, November.
    9. P.P.M.A.R. Heugens, 2004. "A Neo-Weberian Theory of the Firm," Working Papers 04-02, Utrecht School of Economics.
    10. Ali Meftah Gerged, 2021. "Factors affecting corporate environmental disclosure in emerging markets: The role of corporate governance structures," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 609-629, January.
    11. Nicola Cucari & Salvatore Esposito De Falco & Beatrice Orlando, 2018. "Diversity of Board of Directors and Environmental Social Governance: Evidence from Italian Listed Companies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(3), pages 250-266, May.
    12. Renata Konadu & Gabriel Sam Ahinful & Samuel Owusu-Agyei, 2021. "Corporate governance pillars and business sustainability: does stakeholder engagement matter?," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(3), pages 269-289, September.
    13. Caswell, Julie A. & Cotterill, Ronald W., 1988. "New Theoretical Approaches To Measuring Industry Performance," Working Papers 115806, Regional Research Project NE-165 Private Strategies, Public Policies, and Food System Performance.
    14. Junhui Wang & Jerry Sun, 2022. "The role of audit committees in social responsibility and environmental disclosures: evidence from Chinese energy sector," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(1), pages 113-128, March.
    15. Elmagrhi, Mohamed H. & Ntim, Collins G. & Wang, Yan & Elamer, Ahmed A. & Crossley, Richard, 2021. "The effect of vice-chancellor characteristics and internal governance mechanisms on voluntary disclosures in UK higher education institutions," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    16. Cole, Rebel, 2011. "How do firms choose legal form of organization?," MPRA Paper 32591, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Akbas Halil Emre, 2016. "The Relationship Between Board Characteristics and Environmental Disclosure: Evidence from Turkish Listed Companies," South East European Journal of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 11(2), pages 7-19, December.
    18. Mohammad Badrul Haider & Kimitaka Nishitani, 2022. "Ownership structure, corporate governance, and assurance in sustainability reporting: evidence from Japan," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(4), pages 374-388, December.
    19. Cheng Guping & Muhammad Safdar Sial & Peng Wan & Alina Badulescu & Daniel Badulescu & Talles Vianna Brugni, 2020. "Do Board Gender Diversity and Non-Executive Directors Affect CSR Reporting? Insight from Agency Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-25, October.
    20. Amin H. Amershi & Peter Cheng, 1989. "On the demand for historical events recording and maintenance of audit trails," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(1), pages 72-90, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    corporate governance; integrated reporting; integrated financial reporting; investment risk;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • E22 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Investment; Capital; Intangible Capital; Capacity
    • G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance
    • M40 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:7:y:2020:i:4:p:2818-2831. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Manuela Tvaronaviciene (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.